London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs University of Kent vs ONCAMPUS Global vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs University of Worcester

Side-by-side comparison from 468 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE: wins 2/7 categories
University of Kent: wins 0/7 categories
ONCAMPUS Global: wins 0/7 categories
EM Normandie - EM Normandie: wins 0/7 categories
University of Worcester: wins 5/7 categories
London Academy of Trading - LAT: wins 0/7 categories
Le Cordon Bleu Paris: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics
Canterbury, The United Kingdom
4.00
Read more reviews
89 reviews
×
Best programme: Architecture
London, The United Kingdom
4.80
Read more reviews
20 reviews
×
Best programme: Undergraduate Foundation Programme
Best programme: MSc International Logistics and Port Management
Worcester, The United Kingdom
4.80
Read more reviews
15 reviews
×
Best programme: Adult Nursing
London, The United Kingdom
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Culinary Arts
Category ratings
Facilities
4.05
4.15
4.44
4.13
4.77
Win
Not rated
4.40
Location
4.78
Win
4.16
4.74
3.75
4.73
Not rated
4.70
Professors
4.26
3.99
4.75
4.13
4.87
Win
Not rated
4.60
Internationality
4.80
Win
4.36
4.60
4.13
4.33
Not rated
4.60
Student life
3.64
3.91
4.56
3.63
4.72
Win
Not rated
3.90
Value
4.04
3.82
4.50
4.13
4.53
Win
Not rated
3.90
Accommodation
3.79
3.89
4.32
3.57
4.34
Win
Not rated
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Expert, approachable faculty and high-quality teaching
  • +Strong career preparation and marketable skills development
  • +Excellent facilities and a supportive learning environment
  • +Supportive and engaging teaching from experienced professors.
  • +Beautiful campus and excellent on-site facilities and resources.
  • +Valuable career support and unique course/degree opportunities.
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Excellent facilities and convenient location
  • +Strong academic and personal development support
  • +Practical, industry-relevant courses and inspiring professors
  • +Rich international environment and diverse student body
  • +Personal and professional development opportunities
  • +Supportive and friendly lecturers/tutors
  • +Welcoming and diverse student community
  • +Excellent support services

Nothing to show

  • +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
  • +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
  • +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
Cons
  • -Poor teaching quality and unclear learning expectations.
  • -Lack of structure and significant workload.
  • -Disappointing careers service and limited social life.
  • -Poor quality teaching and lack of lecturer expertise.
  • -Insufficient financial resources impacting the department.
  • -Limited student support and focus on student development.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep frustrate students.
  • -Lack of resources and inadequate support services are common complaints.
  • -Financial concerns and perceived low educational value.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are disappointing.
  • -Inconsistent and poor quality instruction diminishes the learning experience.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
  • -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates remarkable strengths in its **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving scores nearing 4.8. **Professors** also score highly at 4.26. Conversely, **Student Life** is the lowest-rated area, with a score of 3.64, followed by **Accomodation** at 3.79. Other aspects like Facilities and Value fall within a solid mid-range.

The university demonstrates notable strengths in its **Internationality**, receiving the highest rating. **Facilities** and **Location** also scored highly, indicating positive aspects in these areas. Conversely, **Value** presents as the weakest point, with the lowest score. **Student Life** and **Accomodation** are rated moderately, alongside **Professors**, suggesting room for improvement in these student experience components.

Overall, the university garners strong ratings across various aspects. Professors are exceptionally well-regarded, achieving the highest score. Location and Internationality also stand out with excellent marks. Student Life, Facilities, and Value also reflect positive sentiment. Accommodation, while still strong, receives the lowest rating among the surveyed categories.

This institution garners excellent marks in several key areas. Facilities, Professors, Internationality, and Value all received high scores of 4.125. Student Life and Accommodations are rated lower, at 3.625 and approximately 3.57 respectively, indicating these are areas with more room for improvement compared to its other strengths. The Location score sits at 3.75.

This institution receives excellent marks in key areas, with Professors scoring highest at 4.87 and Facilities closely following at 4.77. Student Life and Location also garnered strong scores above 4.7. While most aspects are highly rated, Accomodation and Internationality are comparatively lower, both around 4.34. Value for money is rated favorably at 4.53.

Nothing to show

This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nearly 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting a supportive environment, knowledgeable faculty, and excellent facilities. A small percentage (around 3.4%) mention issues like poor lecturing, inconsistent grading, and lack of social life.

With ~87% positive feedback, students highlight a lively, beautiful campus, kind professors, and engaging teaching. A small ~2.3% of reviews mention poor teaching quality and lack of student development focus.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~100% of 20 feedback entries rating 4–5 stars. Students praise friendly, supportive teachers, excellent facilities like the library, and effective student support services that build confidence.

Most reviews praise the inspiring professors, practical learning, and international environment, contributing to a ~74% positive sentiment. One review expressed dissatisfaction, calling it a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.

Students overwhelmingly praise the University of Worcester, with an average rating of 4.8/5. Recurring themes highlight supportive lecturers and excellent student support services. No negative feedback was recorded from the 15 reviews.

Nothing to show

Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.

Rating distribution
5★
34%
22%
75%
38%
80%
0%
60%
4★
44%
63%
25%
38%
20%
0%
40%
3★
18%
12%
0%
13%
0%
0%
0%
2★
2%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
1%
0%
13%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Great Experience

LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.

Covid ruined the vibe

I think Kent is a good university if you make use of the resources around you. The lecturers on my course were very enthusiastic and ready to help with assignments. My course being small I believe I got a lot of 1 to 1 support. Covid however did play a huge part during the duration of my course. It left a lot of students including me very confused with how to access learning material, marking etc. I do also believe there was a lack of support after graduating. I don’t think there was another focus on job applications, interviews and the ‘real world’. However, I do not regret coming to Kent, I had learnt a lot and made a lot of enjoyable memories.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Loved every minute of my time at Worcester!

I have recently completed my nursing degree at the University of Worcester and can honestly say I loved every minute of my time there. The uni itself is a bright and modern space with many facilities on campus, for example, a cafe, Starbucks, Costa, student union, a campus shop, lots of computers, student services, academic writing support etc. The main thing I liked the most about Worcester was the sheer amount of support I received over my three years of nurse training. I went through many tough times both academically and in my personal life and there was always someone there to give me help and support from my personal tutor to student services. The university also has a library on a separate campus not too far away (within walking distance) called the Hive which is a purpose-built university and public library. There are hundreds of computers to use and the variety of books on offer is huge. I always used to go here to do any work as there were quiet areas too. I can’t comment on the accommodation as I lived at home whilst studying, but I have heard good things about the accommodation. In terms of nursing, the university has a small building on the main campus site which is dedicated to nursing and other health courses as it has mannequins where skills can be practised safely in small groups. All the nursing lecturers were amazing, so knowledgeable and approachable. If I want to do a postgraduate course in the future, I will definitely be returning to Worcester. I’m so sad to leave as it has really been the time of my life!

Nothing to show

Student in 2013

I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close