Universidad Externado de Colombia - UEC vs Colegio de Estudios Superiores de Administración - CESA vs Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano - UTADEO vs Corporación de Educación Superior - ISES vs Fundación Universidad de América
Side-by-side comparison from 32 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High-quality, specialized programs
- +Excellent professors and diverse student body
- +Opportunities for international experience and professional growth
- +Prestigious reputation and quality education
- +Professors' real-world marketing experience
- +Enhanced career prospects and labor market opportunities
- +High-quality, experienced faculty
- +Strong, well-structured programs with practical application
- +Excellent academic training and professional growth opportunities
- +Relevant programs leading to career success
- +Contribution to economic growth
- +Supportive and high-quality teaching
- +Ample green campus spaces
- +High-quality academics and clinical programs with qualified instructors.
- +Focus on humanities, values, and leadership development for societal impact.
- +Supportive learning environment with approachable teachers and accessible facilities.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently criticized.
- -Lack of support and unclear communication contribute to student dissatisfaction.
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities are a common complaint.
- -Poor communication and unclear expectations cause frustration.
- -Disorganized and unhelpful administration.
- -Outdated or insufficient facilities and resources.
- -Lack of engaging or relevant curriculum.
- -Poor communication and administrative inefficiency.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and unengaging curriculum.
- -Outdated curriculum and lack of focus on professional development.
- -Poor administrative and management practices.
- -Limited international opportunities and low university ranking.
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are a common complaint.
- -The curriculum and teaching methods are often criticized.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates very strong performance, with its highest marks awarded to Professors (4.69) and its Facilities and Value (both 4.62). Location and Student Life also received excellent scores (4.54). The area with the lowest rating, though still respectable, is Internationality (4.31), followed closely by Accomodation (4.42).
Across the board, this institution achieves outstanding marks, with perfect scores in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. Consequently, there are no clear weakest areas to identify; every aspect surveyed received the highest possible rating, indicating a consistently strong performance. This suggests a well-rounded and highly desirable university experience.
Overall, this institution garners positive evaluations across numerous aspects. Student life and accommodation stand out as the strongest areas, achieving the highest scores. Conversely, internationality is rated slightly lower than other categories, representing the weakest performing metric. Facilities and value received comparable, solid ratings, while professor and location scores were also very strong.
This institution presents a uniform and notably low rating across all assessed aspects. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all received zero marks, indicating significant areas for improvement in every category. There are no standout strengths or discernible weaknesses as all areas are performing at the same low level.
This institution demonstrates exceptional performance across all surveyed categories, receiving a perfect score of 1 in every aspect. Consequently, there are no distinct strongest or weakest areas, as the university excels uniformly in its facilities, professor quality, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value. This indicates a remarkably consistent and high-achieving environment.
This institution receives outstanding marks for its facilities, location, student life, accommodation, and overall value, all scoring a perfect five. Professors are also highly regarded, with a strong 4.5 rating. The university's weakest area is internationality, which received a 3.5, indicating room for growth in that aspect.
Nothing to show
With a 4.61 average rating, students praise its quality programs, excellent facilities, and international opportunities for professional growth. No negative feedback was recorded among the 18 reviews.
With a single review, the university received a perfect 5/5 rating, indicating ~100% positive sentiment. The positive feedback highlighted prestigious education and experienced marketing professors.
All seven reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.86/5. Students praise high-quality faculty, excellent curriculum, state-of-the-art facilities, and strong professional training.
With one review, this institution has a perfect 5/5 average rating. The single review is highly positive, recommending the institution for its academic programs and their contribution to economic growth.
With a 2.5/5 average rating, reviews are split evenly, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative feedback. Positive comments highlight green spaces and satisfactory teaching quality. Negative reviews criticize obsolete curriculum, focus on money, and lack of international agreements or research promotion.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%) with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise academic excellence, qualified teachers, and facilities, along with a focus on humanities and values.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Do not study here, there are other better universities. The pensum are obsolete. The university is only interested in money. There are no international agreements, they do not have a good ranking, they do not promote research or culture of professional development
Nothing to show
Nothing to show