Egerton University vs Staffordshire Business School vs University of Southern Philippines Foundation - USPF vs Stella Maris Polytechnic University - SMPU vs Free University of Great Lake - FUGL

Side-by-side comparison from 66 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: University of Southern Philippines Foundation - USPF (5.00)
Egerton University: wins 0/4 categories
Staffordshire Business School: wins 1/4 categories
University of Southern Philippines Foundation - USPF: wins 3/4 categories
Stella Maris Polytechnic University - SMPU: wins 0/4 categories
Free University of Great Lake - FUGL: wins 0/4 categories
University of Social Sciences - SAN: wins 0/4 categories
Faculty of Higher Studies Iztacala - FESI: wins 0/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Bachelor of Commerce in Accounting
Stoke-on-Trent, The United Kingdom
4.60
Read more reviews
5 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Bachelor of Tourism Management
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Best programme: Ecology
Category ratings
Facilities
4.13
4.60
Win
4.00
3.00
Not rated
3.50
4.00
Location
4.19
4.20
5.00
3.00
Not rated
5.00
2.00
Professors
4.48
4.40
5.00
Win
3.00
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Internationality
3.98
4.40
5.00
Win
2.00
Not rated
3.00
2.00
Student life
4.37
4.60
5.00
3.00
Not rated
2.50
5.00
Value
4.27
4.00
5.00
5.00
Not rated
4.50
5.00
Accommodation
4.00
4.00
5.00
Win
2.00
Not rated
4.00
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong academic programs and supportive, knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Conducive environment for growth and vibrant campus community
  • +Practical learning, research opportunities, and post-graduation opportunities
  • +Excellent student support and friendly staff
  • +Convenient location and good facilities
  • +Engaging and practical learning experiences
  • +Confidence building and positive environment
  • +Inclusive and accepting atmosphere

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Flexible learning options
  • +Relevant curriculum
  • +Professional and capable professors
  • +Improved curriculum and student development focus
  • +Adequate facilities
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support are common complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities are a significant drawback.
  • -The curriculum lacks relevance and practical application.
  • -Ineffective communication and disorganized administrative processes cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world applications.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently mentioned.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and a lack of clear communication cause frustration.
  • -Limited resources and inadequate support for student needs are recurring complaints.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and poor management are frequently cited.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
  • -The curriculum is often described as rigid, uninspiring, and not relevant to current needs.
Rating summary
What students say

This university garners strong marks, with Professors and Student Life standing out as particularly well-regarded areas, achieving scores of 4.48 and 4.37 respectively. Facilities and Location also score well above average. Value for money is also highly rated. The weakest area identified is Internationality, with a score just below 4.

This institution garners excellent marks for its facilities and student life, both scoring a high 4.6. Professors and internationality also receive positive ratings at 4.4. Location is rated at 4.2, while accommodation and overall value stand at 4. The university's weakest areas appear to be accommodation and value, though they still maintain a respectable rating.

Across a comprehensive review, the institution demonstrates exceptional strengths, with perfect scores awarded for Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value. The sole area not receiving a top score is Facilities, which is rated a strong 4 out of 5. This indicates a generally outstanding university experience with only minor room for enhancement in its physical infrastructure.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution excels in several key areas, with location receiving a perfect score and value and professors also garnering strong marks. Accommodations are also well-regarded. Conversely, student life presents the most significant area for improvement, alongside facilities which received a moderate rating. Internationality scores fall within the average range.

This institution excels in student life and perceived value, both receiving perfect scores. Conversely, its location and internationality are noted as weaker aspects, earning just two out of five points. Facilities and professors are rated positively at a solid four, while accommodation falls in the middle with a three.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Over 93% of 56 reviews are positive, praising quality education, strong lecturer-student relationships, and a conducive growth environment with well-structured curriculum and facilities. No negative reviews were provided.

Students highly recommend this university, citing great support, good location near the train station, and excellent facilities like the sports center and student union. The learning environment and teaching methods are also frequently praised. No negative feedback was recorded.

This university has a perfect rating of 5/5, with 100% of feedback being positive. Students appreciate how the school brings out their best, boosts confidence, and promotes gender equality.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4/5, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students appreciate the flexibility of remote lectures and lab work, allowing for better work-study balance.

With one review, the university received a 4/5 average rating. The feedback was ~100% positive, highlighting professional professors and an improved curriculum. Facilities were adequate, though some material shortages were noted.

Rating distribution
5★
48%
60%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
43%
40%
0%
0%
0%
100%
100%
3★
9%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Quality

I like the university offers quality holistics world class training that meets the 21st needs. The programmes offered are competitve embedding the technologies, research, innovation and industrial linkages/collaborations

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close