Banking University Lviv Institute - Libs Ubs vs Egerton University vs Erskine College vs Tanauan Institute, Inc. - TI vs Free University of Great Lake - FUGL

Side-by-side comparison from 59 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Autonomous University of Mexico - UACM (5.00)
Banking University Lviv Institute - Libs Ubs: wins 0/7 categories
Egerton University: wins 4/7 categories
Erskine College: wins 0/7 categories
Tanauan Institute, Inc. - TI: wins 0/7 categories
Free University of Great Lake - FUGL: wins 0/7 categories
Autonomous University of Mexico - UACM: wins 3/7 categories
Universidad Modelo: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Bachelor of Commerce in Accounting
Due West, South Carolina, United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Tanauan City, Philippines
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Electronics and Communication Engineering
Mérida, Mexico
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
4.13
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Location
Not rated
4.19
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Professors
Not rated
4.48
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Internationality
Not rated
3.98
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.50
Not rated
Student life
Not rated
4.37
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.50
Win
Not rated
Value
Not rated
4.27
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Accommodation
Not rated
4.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
2.50
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent facilities and practical learning opportunities.
  • +Engaging and knowledgeable professors.
  • +Positive overall study experience.
  • +Strong academic programs and supportive, knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Conducive environment for growth and vibrant campus community
  • +Practical learning, research opportunities, and post-graduation opportunities

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Tuition-free education and career-focused programs
  • +Supportive faculty and diverse student community
  • +Flexible scheduling and affordable campus amenities

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities are a frequent complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues create significant frustration.
  • -A lack of necessary resources and support hinders learning.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support are common complaints.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources frustrate students.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to dissatisfaction.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

With consistently average ratings across all surveyed categories, this institution presents a uniform experience. No specific area stands out as a particular strength or weakness. The institution appears to offer a neutral environment in terms of facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value.

This university garners strong marks, with Professors and Student Life standing out as particularly well-regarded areas, achieving scores of 4.48 and 4.37 respectively. Facilities and Location also score well above average. Value for money is also highly rated. The weakest area identified is Internationality, with a score just below 4.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Overall, the university demonstrates significant strengths, notably in its professors and value for money, both receiving perfect scores. Student life also stands out with a high rating. Conversely, accommodation presents a clear weakness, scoring the lowest. Facilities and location are moderately rated, while internationality falls somewhere in the middle, indicating areas for potential improvement alongside its strong points.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With one review, the university is rated 4/5 stars. This feedback is approximately 100% positive, highlighting good facilities, practical classes, and exchange program opportunities. Some professors were noted as less effective, but many were praised.

Over 93% of 56 reviews are positive, praising quality education, strong lecturer-student relationships, and a conducive growth environment with well-structured curriculum and facilities. No negative reviews were provided.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With 100% positive feedback and an average rating of 5/5, students highlight highly qualified professors, excellent curricula, and outstanding faculty support. They also appreciate tuition-free education, flexible scheduling, and available amenities.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
48%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
4★
100%
43%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
9%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Quality

I like the university offers quality holistics world class training that meets the 21st needs. The programmes offered are competitve embedding the technologies, research, innovation and industrial linkages/collaborations

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close