EASD Escuela de Arte y Superior de Diseño Antonio Faílde vs Egerton University vs Kent State University - KSU vs Zamboanga Peninsula Polytechnic State University - ZPPSU vs Universiti Sains Malaysia
Side-by-side comparison from 67 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
Nothing to show
- +Strong academic programs and supportive, knowledgeable lecturers
- +Conducive environment for growth and vibrant campus community
- +Practical learning, research opportunities, and post-graduation opportunities
- +High-quality, expert faculty dedicated to student success
- +Strong academic programs with emphasis on experiential learning and research
- +Vibrant and diverse campus community with good facilities
- +Practical, real-world application and specialization
- +Supportive faculty and exceptional academic programs
- +Pleasant and well-equipped campus environment
- +Strong global and regional reputation
- +Strong integration of religious teachings with contemporary education
- +Conducive atmosphere for learning with state-of-the-art facilities
- +Academic excellence and intellectual enlightenment
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support are common complaints.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a persistent concern.
- -Administrative and management issues frequently cause frustration and inefficiency.
- -Limited career support and unclear future prospects leave students feeling unsupported.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly implemented.
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is prevalent.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of adequate resources and support negatively impacts learning.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This university garners strong marks, with Professors and Student Life standing out as particularly well-regarded areas, achieving scores of 4.48 and 4.37 respectively. Facilities and Location also score well above average. Value for money is also highly rated. The weakest area identified is Internationality, with a score just below 4.
The university demonstrates a consistently strong performance across most assessed areas. Location, Internationality, and Value are standout categories, all receiving a near-perfect score of 4.5. While Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Accomodation also score highly at 4.25, these areas represent the only slight deviations from the peak ratings.
Across several key metrics, this institution demonstrates outstanding strengths. Facilities, professors, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value all received perfect scores. The sole area of concern is the location, which was rated at zero, indicating it is a significant drawback compared to its otherwise excellent offerings.
Across various metrics, this institution demonstrates impressive strengths, particularly in the quality of its professors, earning a perfect score. Facilities also stand out with a rating of 4.75. While most areas are well-regarded, student life scores the lowest at 4.0, suggesting room for enhancement in this particular aspect. Overall, the university presents a compelling offering with strong academic and infrastructural foundations.
This institution garners strong marks in key areas like facilities, professors, student life, and accommodation, all receiving a solid 4. Value for money also stands out with an equally positive rating. However, its internationality presents a significant weakness, scoring a low 1. The location also received a less favorable rating of 2.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Over 93% of 56 reviews are positive, praising quality education, strong lecturer-student relationships, and a conducive growth environment with well-structured curriculum and facilities. No negative reviews were provided.
With an average rating of 4.25/5 and ~100% positive feedback, reviewers highlight the university's strong faculty, diverse programs, and valuable learning opportunities. No negative feedback was reported.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university program is highly praised. Students highlight its strong focus on efficient water use, sustainability, and practical fieldwork, preparing them for real-world challenges.
All five reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.8/5. Students praise supportive supervisors, a comfortable research environment, strong global reputation, and top-tier academics with well-equipped facilities.
The single review is highly positive, with a 4/5 average rating. Feedback highlights academic excellence, integration of religious teachings, and a conducive learning atmosphere with well-equipped facilities. No negative feedback was reported.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I like the university offers quality holistics world class training that meets the 21st needs. The programmes offered are competitve embedding the technologies, research, innovation and industrial linkages/collaborations
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show