Universidad Latina de Panamá - ULAT vs Newcastle University vs University of Eastern Piedmont - Upo vs Central Bedfordshire College vs Tel Aviv University - TAU

Side-by-side comparison from 147 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Holy Name University (5.00)
Universidad Latina de Panamá - ULAT: wins 0/7 categories
Newcastle University: wins 3/7 categories
University of Eastern Piedmont - Upo: wins 0/7 categories
Central Bedfordshire College: wins 0/7 categories
Tel Aviv University - TAU: wins 0/7 categories
Holy Name University: wins 4/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Business Administration and International Relations
Newcastle, The United Kingdom
4.40
Read more reviews
133 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Science
Best programme: Administrative and Accounting Systems
Bedfordshire, The United Kingdom
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Administrative and Accounting Systems
bohol, Philippines
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Business Finance
Category ratings
Facilities
2.00
4.52
Win
3.83
Not rated
4.00
4.50
Location
4.50
4.75
Win
4.17
Not rated
3.33
4.50
Professors
3.00
4.20
4.33
Not rated
3.67
5.00
Win
Internationality
3.00
4.29
3.83
Not rated
3.67
5.00
Win
Student life
2.00
4.68
Win
3.67
Not rated
2.67
4.50
Value
3.00
4.11
4.17
Not rated
3.67
5.00
Win
Accommodation
1.00
4.21
3.83
Not rated
2.00
4.50
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality professors
  • +Collaborative learning environment
  • +Challenging administrative processes
  • +Strong academic programs with practical application
  • +Supportive professors and learning environment
  • +Excellent career services and preparation for the workforce
  • +Excellent lecturers and professors
  • +High-quality facilities and hands-on experience
  • +Supportive learning environment and student-focused approach

Nothing to show

  • +Encouraging professors and critical thinking
  • +Strong academic and career opportunities
  • +Flexible double-degree programs
  • +Vibrant campus life and engaging student organizations
  • +High-quality education with personalized professor attention
  • +Supportive systems and guidance to achieve academic dreams
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant problems.
  • -Lack of professor engagement and support hinders learning.
  • -Scheduling conflicts and unreliable information are frequent frustrations.
  • -Lack of academic and personal support, especially at the master's level, feels like a money grab.
  • -Minimal resources and effort from academic support teams are disappointing.
  • -Outdated and poorly organized facilities.
  • -Unwelcoming and insular university environment.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and student support is a problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources detract from learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are prevalent complaints.
Rating summary
What students say

Among the surveyed categories, the university particularly excels in its **Location**, receiving a high score of 4.5. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as a significant weakness, with a rating of just 1. Ratings for Professors, Internationality, and Value are moderate at 3. Facilities and Student Life both received lower marks of 2.

Analyzing university ratings reveals strengths in location, student life, and facilities. These areas received the highest scores, indicating a well-rounded student experience. Conversely, value for money emerged as the weakest point, though still at a respectable level. Other factors like professors, accommodation, and internationality also scored well, contributing to an overall positive assessment.

This institution receives particularly high marks for its **Professors**, achieving a 4.33 rating. **Location** and **Value** also stand out with scores of 4.17. The university's **Student Life** is the lowest-rated aspect at 3.67. Ratings for **Facilities**, **Accomodation**, and **Internationality** are all solid, hovering around 3.83.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in its facilities, earning a solid 4 out of 5. Internationality and value are also well-regarded, both receiving 3.67. Professors also scored well at 3.67. However, areas such as student life and accommodation received lower marks, with student life at 2.67 and accommodation at a disappointing 2. Location also presents a moderate score of 3.33.

This institution demonstrates outstanding performance, achieving perfect scores in the critical areas of Professors and Internationality. Its strengths also extend to Facilities, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, and Value, all receiving a high rating of 4.5. The university appears to excel broadly, with no significantly weak areas identified in this assessment.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 3.33/5, ~67% of reviews are positive, praising professors and learning potential. ~33% of feedback expresses dissatisfaction with administrative processes, lack of automation, and unhelpful staff.

With a 4.38/5 average from 133 reviews, ~92% of feedback is positive, highlighting academic quality, supportive professors, and a good campus environment. A single negative review mentioned poor masters-level support.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~83%), praising excellent lecturers, well-equipped facilities, and a supportive learning atmosphere. A small amount of feedback (~17%) notes disorganization and dated facilities in certain areas.

Nothing to show

University reviews are highly positive (~100% of feedback), with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students highlight world-class education, particularly in research and tech, and flexible programs. Some mention challenges like high living costs and administrative hurdles.

Both reviews are overwhelmingly positive, giving a perfect 5/5 average rating. Students praise vibrant campus life, quality education, and professor guidance. There are no negative reviews in the sample.

Rating distribution
5★
33%
47%
17%
0%
33%
100%
4★
33%
45%
67%
0%
67%
0%
3★
0%
8%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
1%
17%
0%
0%
0%
1★
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Quite a good university with a bit messed up Computer Science course

The facilities of the school of computing are great - very modern building, newest equipment, campus located in the city centre (most likely you don’t need to commute there by metro or a bus). One major thing however that is lacking is the organisation. Being a third-year student I still have the same feeling - the program is written very chaotically. In 2019 there was that revolution of the programme (to keep learning the newest technology) to which lectures and demonstrators still feel a bit unadapted. I hope this will get better in the next year or two years. However, after that time, the taught technology may change again (which is good) and it will take another couple of years for the lecturers to be fluent in what they teaching (which is not good).

Excellent Teaching and Environment

I first thought it wasn't going to be great because the university isn't that popular in Italy but when I got here and started lectures, I was amazed. The university gives an awesome atmosphere for learning and brings in lecturers and experts who are doing great in their careers to teach us. The only thing I had to adjust to was the long hours of lecture. I'll gladly recommend.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close