Universidad Autónoma de Nayarit - UAN vs University of Bayreuth vs Polytechnic Institute of Setúbal vs Tel Aviv University - TAU vs Hogeschool Gent - HoGent
Side-by-side comparison from 14 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
Nothing to show
- +excellent support for international students
- +outstanding campus services
- +welcoming atmosphere
- +Helpful and kind teachers
- +Good quality teaching and course materials
- +Large space with diverse schools
- +Encouraging professors and critical thinking
- +Strong academic and career opportunities
- +Flexible double-degree programs
- +Practical field exposure & industry professionals as instructors
- +Supportive and friendly staff
- +Convenient local study options
- +Good campus facilities
- +Strong technical programmes and practical learning opportunities
- +Dedicated, qualified, and supportive lecturers
- +Modern facilities and a vibrant campus environment
Nothing to show
- -Students face significant administrative hurdles and harassment from foreign office bureaucracy.
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and poor technology are frequent complaints.
- -Lack of practical application and relevance in coursework is a significant concern.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and student support is a problem.
- -Lack of qualified teachers and poor communication regarding substitutes.
- -Unsupportive and unaccommodating staff, particularly in internship support.
- -Inconsistent quality of teaching and lack of objectivity in some classes.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are major drawbacks.
- -The curriculum and teaching methods are often seen as uninspiring or irrelevant.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a consistent problem.
- -Poor communication and a lack of transparency create uncertainty and dissatisfaction.
Nothing to show
The university garners strong ratings in its academic and campus offerings, with particularly high marks for professors and student life. Facilities and location also receive positive scores, indicating a well-rounded environment. However, areas like accommodation and internationality are rated more moderately, suggesting potential for improvement. Value for money is also rated at a similar level, indicating a balanced but not outstanding offering.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its teaching staff, with professors receiving a high rating of 4.5. Accommodation also scores well at 4. Conversely, facilities represent the weakest area, rated at 3. Other aspects like location, student life, internationality, and value fall within a moderate to good range, generally between 3.5 and 4.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in its facilities, earning a solid 4 out of 5. Internationality and value are also well-regarded, both receiving 3.67. Professors also scored well at 3.67. However, areas such as student life and accommodation received lower marks, with student life at 2.67 and accommodation at a disappointing 2. Location also presents a moderate score of 3.33.
The university scores highly in location, earning a notable 4.5. Accommodation also receives a positive rating of 4. Areas of solid performance include professors, student life, and internationality, all with scores of 3.5. The university's weakest area is facilities, rated at 3.
This institution demonstrates outstanding strengths, earning perfect scores for its facilities, professors, location, and perceived value. Student life and internationality are also well-regarded, receiving solid 4-star ratings. However, the accommodation aspect is notably weaker, standing at just 2 stars, which could be an area for development.
Across various metrics, this institution receives commendations, particularly for its exceptional professors and prime location, both scoring highly. Student life and internationality are areas for potential improvement, indicated by lower ratings. Facilities also present a moderately good but not outstanding aspect. Accommodation and value for money are rated quite favorably, suggesting a positive overall experience in these regards.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 3/5, student feedback is split, with positive mentions of campus services and international student support, while negative reviews highlight significant difficulties with the foreign office.
With an average rating of 4/5 based on two reviews, student feedback is ~100% positive. Students highlight helpful teachers and good course materials. Minor areas for improvement include facilities and HVAC maintenance.
University reviews are highly positive (~100% of feedback), with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students highlight world-class education, particularly in research and tech, and flexible programs. Some mention challenges like high living costs and administrative hurdles.
With an average rating of 3/5, reviews are split evenly. Positive feedback highlights engaging guest lectures and real-world practice, while negative comments cite issues with consistent teaching staff, biased instructors, and unsupportive administrative interactions.
With one review, the average rating is 5/5. This student praised friendly and helpful staff, campus facilities, and a wide variety of courses. No negative feedback was provided.
The university is highly praised for its academic excellence, practical learning opportunities, and career preparation. All feedback is positive, reflecting strong satisfaction with quality instruction and facilities.
Nothing to show
the university is located in a city where the foreign office makes the life so difficult for people that a visit to the auslandersamt is all they think about, almost all my classmates left the university after the harassment by the auslandersamt(foreign office) however race has nothing to do it as a few of my white American friends also had to drop out of their studies due to the harassment. Irrespective of how good the studies are or how beautiful the city is, it doesn't matter when the foreign office destroys your career. A good scenery won't bring back years you wasted.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
We didn't have a biology teacher for a full year. 4 different substitute teachers that weren't informed well by HoGent. The arts class is very educational, but the teacher is not objectieve at all. Was talking to the internship supporter, she doesn't let jou talk. Can't get a word in between. Very annoying. I don't feel like she cared to listen. She doesn't give a fuck. It's not okey! Don't expect support. There are some really sweet teachers. But overall no great support or organization.
Nothing to show
My experience a NUST was a time to remember. I was in the engineering department. Lecturers were always on time for lecturers, and work and assignments were given and marked. I am the engineer I am owing to the dedication by the chemical engineering lecturers. Quality notes and lecturers are given as well as projects supervision and guidance. Even years after I have graduated, they are still available to give letters of recommendation as per request. My degree is recognized everywhere l have been and l recently got accredited as a professional engineer with ECSA based on my experience and academic background. Campus life as an engineering student is quite dull to be honest, best indulge in sports. During my time I took part in Basketball and athletics. They had transport from campus to the practice courts as the university didn't have an onsite basketball court. As for the ZUSA games where we meet with other universities to compete, I give that 1 star as we had to sleep in the bus over a two-day trip. I don't know if that has improved as resources were truly limited
