Budapest Business University - BBU vs University of Debrecen vs ESSCA School of Management vs Corvinus Business School vs Wekerle International University
Side-by-side comparison from 136 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical knowledge and real-world application
- +Knowledgeable and supportive professors
- +Strong student support and well-structured courses
- +Approachable and invested lecturers
- +Well-structured, engaging programmes with practical application
- +International environment and community building
- +Practical, real-world teaching and international exposure
- +Supportive staff and engaging learning environment
- +High-quality programs and diverse student body
- +Challenging and skill-enriching academic environment
- +Positive overall experience despite external factors
- +Supportive scholarship opportunities
- +Friendly, international learning environment
- +Supportive professors, practical business concepts
- +Organized classes, useful study materials
- +Practical, up-to-date curriculum with real-world focus
- +Affordable, international study environment
- +Welcoming city with good social opportunities
- +Engaging instructors and inspiring teaching
- +Relevant and practical curriculum
- +Excellent career support and opportunities
- -Poor communication and administrative issues.
- -Unprofessional teaching staff and language barriers.
- -Disorganized structure and struggles with course registration.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant stress.
- -Lack of teacher support and career counseling hinders student progress.
- -Study quality is often poor, especially in non-medical fields.
- -Irrelevant course content and unqualified instructors.
- -High tuition fees for perceived poor value.
- -Lack of student motivation and academic focus.
- -Administrative and management issues are a constant source of frustration.
- -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Course content and teaching methods are frequently seen as unengaging and irrelevant.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors is a common complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant and poorly delivered.
- -Administrative and management issues are prevalent.
- -Poor English proficiency of some professors hinders learning.
- -Lack of student support and care is a significant concern.
This university garners a strong overall rating, with Location emerging as its most celebrated aspect. Professors and Value are also highly regarded. Conversely, Accomodation received the lowest score. Student Life and Facilities are mid-range, while Internationality is also a notable strength. The university presents a generally positive picture, with distinct areas of excellence and areas for potential improvement.
Overall, this university garners strong ratings across most aspects. Internationality stands out as a particularly high-scoring area, reflecting a well-developed global presence. Conversely, accommodation received the lowest rating among the surveyed categories. Other areas like facilities, student life, and professors also received favorable scores, indicating a generally positive university experience.
This institution shows excellent strengths in its **Location** and **Student Life**, both receiving high scores of 4.15. **Professors** also garnered a perfect 4. **Facilities**, with a score of 3.54, and **Value** at 3.77, are respectable. The **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, scoring 3.31. **Internationality** is also a strong point, rated at 3.92.
This institution garners exceptional marks for its **location, student life, internationality, and overall value**, all receiving perfect scores. The quality of its **professors** is also highly praised. However, areas for improvement are evident in **facilities and accommodation**, which received lower, albeit still adequate, ratings.
Overall, this institution demonstrates a solid performance across multiple facets of student experience. Its location receives the highest mark, a testament to its desirable setting. Conversely, accommodation stands out as the weakest area, suggesting potential room for improvement in this regard. Other aspects like facilities, professors, student life, internationality, and value are all rated positively, indicating a well-rounded educational environment.
This university garners high marks in several key areas, with Internationality and Location being particularly strong at 4.64 and 4.57 respectively. Facilities, Professors, and Value also receive excellent scores, all above 4.35. Accommodations are rated well at 4.21. Student Life, however, is the weakest area with a rating of 3.8.
This institution excels in its accommodation facilities, receiving a high rating of 4. Conversely, areas requiring significant improvement include facilities, location, and value for money, all scoring a low 1. Professors, student life, and internationality received moderate ratings of 2, indicating these aspects are neither a strong suit nor a major weakness.
~57% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical knowledge and professional, up-to-date teachers. ~9.5% of feedback indicates issues with communication and organization.
~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting beautiful buildings, friendly lecturers, and a diverse international community. A small percentage (~4%) express concerns about academic support and specific program quality.
Most reviews (around 70%) highlight practical teaching, an international environment, and good quality staff/students. A small percentage (about 7.7%) express dissatisfaction with course relevance and teacher quality.
This university receives very positive feedback, with ~100% of reviews being 4-5 stars. Students highlight the nourishing of skills and a competitive yet positive environment. Accommodation costs are noted as high.
With one review available, the university has a 4/5 average rating. The feedback highlights a friendly, international environment and supportive professors. No negative feedback was received.
~93% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical, up-to-date curricula and hands-on learning. Negative feedback, representing ~0%, was not provided.
This university has received one review, which is negative. The student rated it 1 out of 5 stars, citing unprofessionalism, poor program management, and English language difficulties among some professors.
The environment is good and it’s multicultural The compound is really nice but a bit far(depending on the faculty) They should have a sports team because of the facilities that they have They should really consider the sports career of the university
The university offers a strong academic foundation with well-structured courses and a wide range of modules to choose from. I appreciated the flexibility of the programme, which allowed me to explore my interests while still gaining core knowledge in my field. Lecturers were approachable and genuinely invested in students’ growth, and the academic support available was excellent. However, I found that some courses were a bit too theoretical and would have benefited from more hands-on or industry-relevant components. Despite that, the overall environment encouraged self-discipline, curiosity, and collaboration. I would recommend this university to students who are self-motivated and eager to take ownership of their learning journey.
ESSCA School of Management is known for its international approach and diverse programs. In my opinion, many students appreciate its emphasis on experiential learning and the opportunities for international exposure through exchange programs and internships. However, some may find the workload demanding and challenging but that's the way it operates. Whether I recommend it would depend on your specific academic and career goals, as well as your preferences for learning style and environment. Likes/ Dislikes: *Essca provides enormous opportunities to improve and enhance your skill. *Diversified culture *Provides webinars and seminars across all the campuses. *Workload Management could be seen as an disadvantage. As sometimes, you may find it very challenging.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
My experience with the Business Development Master’s program has been really great overall. It offers high-quality education with practical knowledge. The courses are well-structured. The program has been renewed and designed to match current business trends, not just old-school textbook knowledge. We worked on a bunch of case studies, group projects, and presentations. We also experienced real business scenarios in every semester from subjects like Project Management, Tutorial: Startup Lab, Marketing Analysis and Planning, ESG, etc. Another important factor is affordability. Compared to many other master’s programs in Europe, this one gives really good value for money. You’re getting a strong education, experienced lecturers, and a modern curriculum, without the crazy tuition fees you’d expect elsewhere. The programme also feels fresh and up-to-date. Topics like innovation, strategy, and business development are approached in a way that reflects what’s actually happening in the business world today. The atmosphere is great. The community is diverse, and working with people from different backgrounds adds a lot to the experience. Plus you can meet different cultures and get new friends from all around the World. Also the study department is a huge help for every student. I used to be a Student Representative and working with the staff was easy, because they supported and informed us constantly. Overall, I’d say the Business Development Master’s at PTE KTK is a great choice if you’re looking for something modern, practical, and affordable, without sacrificing quality.
Nothing to show
