Eötvös Loránd University - ELTE vs University of Debrecen vs ESSCA School of Management vs Budapest Metropolitan University vs University of Miskolc
Side-by-side comparison from 161 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent professors and clear explanations
- +Rigorous and well-structured programs
- +Broad and interesting academic opportunities
- +Approachable and invested lecturers
- +Internationally diverse and friendly student community
- +Strong, well-structured programs with practical application
- +Strong international focus and diverse programs
- +Excellent networking opportunities and alumni network
- +Engaging learning environment and helpful professors
- +Unique, broad, and exploratory learning approach
- +Modern, open-minded environment
- +Innovative learning environment and supportive community
- +Internationalization and cultural diversity
- +Accomplished faculty and top-notch facilities
Nothing to show
- +Practical, up-to-date curriculum with real-world focus
- +Affordable, international study environment
- +Welcoming city with good social opportunities
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning and comfort.
- -Lack of clear communication and student support creates confusion and dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant stress.
- -Lack of teacher support and career/job assistance is a major problem.
- -The quality of studies is perceived as poor in many programs.
- -Irrelevant courses and unqualified instructors are a common complaint.
- -The high cost of tuition for subpar offerings is a significant detractor.
- -Lack of practical skills and real-world application in the curriculum.
- -Administrative and management issues create significant problems.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of adequate support and communication leaves students feeling unsupported.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant and poorly delivered.
This university garners high marks in several key areas, with **Location** standing out as its strongest attribute at 4.63. **Internationality** and **Value** also received very favorable scores, reflecting strengths in global appeal and perceived worth. Conversely, **Accommodations** present the weakest area, scoring notably lower than other categories. **Professors** and **Student Life** are rated positively, indicating solid performance in teaching and campus experience.
This institution garners exceptional praise for its **Internationality**, achieving a near-perfect score. **Facilities** also stand out with a high rating. Conversely, **Accomodation** received the lowest score among the surveyed aspects. The university demonstrates solid performance in **Professors**, **Student Life**, and **Value**, with **Location** also being well-regarded.
This university's strengths lie significantly in its **Internationality**, rated at 4.29, and **Student Life** and **Professors**, both scoring a high 4.14. However, **Accomodation** emerges as the weakest area, with a considerably lower rating of 2.86. Other aspects like Facilities (3.57), Location (3.71), and Value (4) fall within a moderate to good range.
This university presents a generally positive but mixed picture. Its strongest areas include Internationality, scoring a solid 4. Professors also received a commendable rating of 3.67. Conversely, Student Life and Accommodation are its weakest points, both averaging a 3. Facilities, Location, and Value are all rated moderately at 3.33.
This institution garners strong marks across several aspects. Location stands out as the highest-rated area, followed closely by accommodation. Professors and student life also received commendable scores. While facilities and internationality performed well, the value proposition emerged as the lowest-rated category. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded profile with a particular strength in its physical setting and living arrangements.
Nothing to show
This university garners high marks in several key areas, with Internationality and Location being particularly strong at 4.64 and 4.57 respectively. Facilities, Professors, and Value also receive excellent scores, all above 4.35. Accommodations are rated well at 4.21. Student Life, however, is the weakest area with a rating of 3.8.
Most university student feedback (approximately 74%) is positive, highlighting rigorous programs, knowledgeable professors, and a good community. Some students noted minor administrative disorganization and issues with professors' English proficiency.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting approachable lecturers and a beautiful campus. Negative feedback, about 4.3%, points to a lack of structured support and occasional issues with specific departments or programs.
~86% of reviews are positive, highlighting international exposure, networking, and good professors. Some negative feedback (~14%) mentioned irrelevant courses and teachers.
With an average rating of 3/5, student feedback is mixed. Approximately 33% of reviews are negative, citing a lack of technical skills and real-world experience. Positive comments highlight the university's unique, modern, and open-minded approach.
The University of Miskolc receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~91% of reviews being highly favorable. Students praise cutting-edge labs, approachable professors, a supportive community, and internationalization. No negative feedback was noted.
Nothing to show
~93% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical, up-to-date curricula and hands-on learning. Negative feedback, representing ~0%, was not provided.
There is a big variety of departments to choose from, including ones that are the only available ones within the country. Unfortunately on the other hand, the organization and communication of the institution was not on the level of quality that one would expect from one of the top universities in the country. Regarding the quality of education, I had very mixed experiences as there are big differences within the departments and among the professors.
The university offers a strong academic foundation with well-structured courses and a wide range of modules to choose from. I appreciated the flexibility of the programme, which allowed me to explore my interests while still gaining core knowledge in my field. Lecturers were approachable and genuinely invested in students’ growth, and the academic support available was excellent. However, I found that some courses were a bit too theoretical and would have benefited from more hands-on or industry-relevant components. Despite that, the overall environment encouraged self-discipline, curiosity, and collaboration. I would recommend this university to students who are self-motivated and eager to take ownership of their learning journey.
ESSCA School of Management is known for its international approach and diverse programs. In my opinion, many students appreciate its emphasis on experiential learning and the opportunities for international exposure through exchange programs and internships. However, some may find the workload demanding and challenging but that's the way it operates. Whether I recommend it would depend on your specific academic and career goals, as well as your preferences for learning style and environment. Likes/ Dislikes: *Essca provides enormous opportunities to improve and enhance your skill. *Diversified culture *Provides webinars and seminars across all the campuses. *Workload Management could be seen as an disadvantage. As sometimes, you may find it very challenging.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
My experience with the Business Development Master’s program has been really great overall. It offers high-quality education with practical knowledge. The courses are well-structured. The program has been renewed and designed to match current business trends, not just old-school textbook knowledge. We worked on a bunch of case studies, group projects, and presentations. We also experienced real business scenarios in every semester from subjects like Project Management, Tutorial: Startup Lab, Marketing Analysis and Planning, ESG, etc. Another important factor is affordability. Compared to many other master’s programs in Europe, this one gives really good value for money. You’re getting a strong education, experienced lecturers, and a modern curriculum, without the crazy tuition fees you’d expect elsewhere. The programme also feels fresh and up-to-date. Topics like innovation, strategy, and business development are approached in a way that reflects what’s actually happening in the business world today. The atmosphere is great. The community is diverse, and working with people from different backgrounds adds a lot to the experience. Plus you can meet different cultures and get new friends from all around the World. Also the study department is a huge help for every student. I used to be a Student Representative and working with the staff was easy, because they supported and informed us constantly. Overall, I’d say the Business Development Master’s at PTE KTK is a great choice if you’re looking for something modern, practical, and affordable, without sacrificing quality.
