University of Debrecen vs University of Szeged vs ESSCA School of Management vs Corvinus Business School vs University of Miskolc
Side-by-side comparison from 139 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Approachable and invested lecturers
- +Internationally diverse and friendly student community
- +Strong, well-structured programs with practical application
- +Excellent and supportive faculty and staff
- +Diverse and well-structured academic programs
- +Welcoming and advantageous environment for students
- +Practical teaching, real-life cases, and experiential learning
- +International environment and diverse programs with exchange opportunities
- +Supportive staff and high-quality teaching and content
- +Challenging and skill-enriching academic environment
- +Positive overall experience despite external factors
- +Supportive scholarship opportunities
- +Innovative learning environment and supportive community
- +Internationalization and cultural diversity
- +Accomplished faculty and top-notch facilities
Nothing to show
- +Practical, up-to-date curriculum with real-world focus
- +Affordable, international study environment
- +Welcoming city with good social opportunities
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant stress.
- -Lack of teacher support and career/job assistance is a major problem.
- -The quality of studies is perceived as poor in many programs.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources hinder learning.
- -Limited opportunities for practical experience and insufficient career support are major drawbacks.
- -Irrelevant courses and unqualified teachers lead to dissatisfaction.
- -High cost is not justified by the quality of education offered.
- -Administrative and management issues are a constant source of frustration.
- -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Course content and teaching methods are frequently seen as unengaging and irrelevant.
- -Administrative and management issues create significant problems.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of adequate support and communication leaves students feeling unsupported.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant and poorly delivered.
This institution garners exceptional praise for its **Internationality**, achieving a near-perfect score. **Facilities** also stand out with a high rating. Conversely, **Accomodation** received the lowest score among the surveyed aspects. The university demonstrates solid performance in **Professors**, **Student Life**, and **Value**, with **Location** also being well-regarded.
This institution demonstrates a strong performance across multiple aspects, with student life and professors receiving particularly high marks. While facilities and accommodation are rated well, they represent the areas with room for improvement compared to other categories. The university also scores favorably in location, internationality, and value.
This institution performs best in Student Life, receiving a strong rating of 4.18. Professors, Location, and Internationality also received excellent marks around 4.09. The weakest area for the university is Accomodation, scoring 3.27. Facilities and Value are rated moderately well, with scores of 3.64 and 3.82 respectively.
This institution garners exceptional marks for its **location, student life, internationality, and overall value**, all receiving perfect scores. The quality of its **professors** is also highly praised. However, areas for improvement are evident in **facilities and accommodation**, which received lower, albeit still adequate, ratings.
This institution garners strong marks across several aspects. Location stands out as the highest-rated area, followed closely by accommodation. Professors and student life also received commendable scores. While facilities and internationality performed well, the value proposition emerged as the lowest-rated category. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded profile with a particular strength in its physical setting and living arrangements.
Nothing to show
This university garners high marks in several key areas, with Internationality and Location being particularly strong at 4.64 and 4.57 respectively. Facilities, Professors, and Value also receive excellent scores, all above 4.35. Accommodations are rated well at 4.21. Student Life, however, is the weakest area with a rating of 3.8.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting approachable lecturers and a beautiful campus. Negative feedback, about 4.3%, points to a lack of structured support and occasional issues with specific departments or programs.
University of Szeged receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~83% of reviews being highly positive (4-5 stars). Students appreciate the wide range of faculties, great library, and scholarship opportunities. Teaching methodologies and supportive professors are frequently praised.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical teaching, international focus, and supportive staff. One review (around 9%) criticizes course relevance and instructor quality.
This university receives very positive feedback, with ~100% of reviews being 4-5 stars. Students highlight the nourishing of skills and a competitive yet positive environment. Accommodation costs are noted as high.
The University of Miskolc receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~91% of reviews being highly favorable. Students praise cutting-edge labs, approachable professors, a supportive community, and internationalization. No negative feedback was noted.
Nothing to show
~93% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical, up-to-date curricula and hands-on learning. Negative feedback, representing ~0%, was not provided.
The university offers a strong academic foundation with well-structured courses and a wide range of modules to choose from. I appreciated the flexibility of the programme, which allowed me to explore my interests while still gaining core knowledge in my field. Lecturers were approachable and genuinely invested in students’ growth, and the academic support available was excellent. However, I found that some courses were a bit too theoretical and would have benefited from more hands-on or industry-relevant components. Despite that, the overall environment encouraged self-discipline, curiosity, and collaboration. I would recommend this university to students who are self-motivated and eager to take ownership of their learning journey.
Nothing to show
ESSCA School of Management is known for its international approach and diverse programs. In my opinion, many students appreciate its emphasis on experiential learning and the opportunities for international exposure through exchange programs and internships. However, some may find the workload demanding and challenging but that's the way it operates. Whether I recommend it would depend on your specific academic and career goals, as well as your preferences for learning style and environment. Likes/ Dislikes: *Essca provides enormous opportunities to improve and enhance your skill. *Diversified culture *Provides webinars and seminars across all the campuses. *Workload Management could be seen as an disadvantage. As sometimes, you may find it very challenging.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
My experience with the Business Development Master’s program has been really great overall. It offers high-quality education with practical knowledge. The courses are well-structured. The program has been renewed and designed to match current business trends, not just old-school textbook knowledge. We worked on a bunch of case studies, group projects, and presentations. We also experienced real business scenarios in every semester from subjects like Project Management, Tutorial: Startup Lab, Marketing Analysis and Planning, ESG, etc. Another important factor is affordability. Compared to many other master’s programs in Europe, this one gives really good value for money. You’re getting a strong education, experienced lecturers, and a modern curriculum, without the crazy tuition fees you’d expect elsewhere. The programme also feels fresh and up-to-date. Topics like innovation, strategy, and business development are approached in a way that reflects what’s actually happening in the business world today. The atmosphere is great. The community is diverse, and working with people from different backgrounds adds a lot to the experience. Plus you can meet different cultures and get new friends from all around the World. Also the study department is a huge help for every student. I used to be a Student Representative and working with the staff was easy, because they supported and informed us constantly. Overall, I’d say the Business Development Master’s at PTE KTK is a great choice if you’re looking for something modern, practical, and affordable, without sacrificing quality.
