Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México - UNAM vs Universidad del valle de México - UVM vs Universidad Iberoamericana - IBERO vs Universidad Anáhuac vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris
Side-by-side comparison from 156 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Academic excellence and diverse, relevant programs
- +Supportive environment and helpful professors
- +Modern facilities, scholarships, and campus safety
- +Accessible education via scholarships
- +Engaging professors and diverse academic offerings
- +Extracurricular activities and community involvement
- +Expert professors and high academic rigor
- +Strong practical and hands-on learning experiences
- +Positive student environment and well-planned programs
- +Leadership and values development
- +Academic excellence and practical application
- +Supportive community and modern facilities
- +Exceptional chef instructors and curriculum quality.
- +Strong emphasis on skill development and practical experience.
- +Valuable international reputation and alumni network.
Nothing to show
- +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
- +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
- +Engaging hybrid learning format
- -Limited student support and resources outside of the library.
- -Overcrowded classes hinder teacher attention and individual assistance.
- -Perceived lack of evolution and adaptability within the academic environment.
- -Persistent, intrusive recruitment calls.
- -Ineffective and overwhelming communication channels.
- -Outdated study programs and inadequate coordinator training.
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is evident.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Poor communication and administrative support.
- -Lack of practical application and relevance in coursework.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Perceived lack of value for money.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its faculty, student life, and overall value, with ratings of 4.32, 4.29, and 4.4 respectively. Its facilities and internationality are also well-regarded, scoring above 4.0. The weakest area identified is accommodation, receiving a rating of 3.32, which suggests room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience.
Academic strengths emerge clearly, with Professors and Student Life receiving the highest marks. Facilities and Location also score well. Areas for potential improvement include Accomodation and Internationality, which received the lowest ratings. Value for money falls in the middle of the spectrum.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its vibrant **Student Life** and highly regarded **Professors**, both scoring an impressive 4.5. **Location** also receives a high mark. Conversely, **Internationality** stands out as a weaker area, with a considerably lower rating. Other aspects like Facilities, Value, and Accomodation fall within a solid mid-range.
This institution garners excellent scores, with accommodation standing out as its strongest area at 4.65625. Student life and value also received high marks. Professors represent the area with the lowest rating at 4.40625, though it remains a very positive score. Overall, the university demonstrates considerable strengths in most aspects evaluated.
Performance varies across key aspects of university life. Outstanding ratings were awarded for Location (4.75) and Professors (4.625), alongside strong marks for Internationality (4.625) and Facilities (4.5). Student Life (3.875) and Value (4.125) received good scores. Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.
Nothing to show
With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.
Most reviews are positive (~96%), highlighting academic richness, diverse programs, and a vibrant campus. A small number of negative comments (~4%) mention overcrowded classes.
Around 54% of reviews are positive, highlighting good resources and engaging professors. The average rating is 3.71/5, with minimal negative feedback.
The vast majority of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent academic programs, expert professors, and practical learning experiences. A small portion of feedback suggests improvements to program currency and coordinator training.
With ~97% positive feedback and an average of 4.58/5, students praise academic excellence, leadership development, and integral personal growth programs. No negative reviews were recorded.
All eight student reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.63/5. Students highly praise the knowledgeable instructors, quality curriculum, and enriching learning experience.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.
Nothing to show
The International Business Administration degree at Universidad del Valle de México is an academic journey that will strenghten the skills that you have while traching you diverse ways to apply them to the business world. Accounting, negotiation, finance, marketing, international trade, are just some of the main topics to mention that this degree allows you to deep dive into. Upon graduating, every student will have the required tools and skills to follwo their own professional path.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
