Universidad Sergio Arboleda vs Pontificia Universidad Javeriana - PUJ vs Colegio de Estudios Superiores de Administración - CESA vs Universidad Manuela Beltrán - UMB vs Corporación de Educación Superior - ISES
Side-by-side comparison from 45 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Passionate professors and vibrant learning environment
- +Modern facilities and academic opportunities
- +Strong career support and personal development
- +strong academic programs and well-qualified teachers
- +holistic development through extracurriculars and soft skills
- +supportive campus atmosphere and international community
- +Prestigious reputation and quality education
- +Professors' real-world marketing experience
- +Enhanced career prospects and labor market opportunities
- +High-quality, accredited programs with well-equipped facilities and practical application of knowledge.
- +Emphasis on creativity, research, and instilling strong values for responsible and ethical professionals.
- +Opportunities for diverse practical experiences and national/international student exchange programs.
- +Relevant programs leading to career success
- +Contribution to economic growth
- +High-quality academics and clinical programs with qualified instructors.
- +Focus on humanities, values, and leadership development for societal impact.
- +Supportive learning environment with approachable teachers and accessible facilities.
Nothing to show
- -Lack of academic rigor and unchallenging coursework.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a problem.
- -Poor communication and unsupportive staff are significant drawbacks.
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities are a common complaint.
- -Poor communication and unclear expectations cause frustration.
- -Inconsistent and unclear communication from administration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Lack of career services and job placement support.
- -Poor communication and administrative inefficiency.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and unengaging curriculum.
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are a common complaint.
- -The curriculum and teaching methods are often criticized.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **location**, receiving a high rating of 4.56, and in its **student life**, scoring 4.44. **Facilities** also fare well with a rating of 4.11. Conversely, the **accommodation** category shows the lowest score at 3.89, indicating it as a potential area for improvement. Ratings for professors, internationality, and value fall within a solid mid-range.
Overall, this university garners strong ratings across multiple aspects. Facilities stand out as a significant strength, alongside excellent scores for professors and student life. While accommodations received the lowest rating, areas such as location, internationality, and value also present a positive picture, indicating a well-rounded experience.
Across the board, this institution achieves outstanding marks, with perfect scores in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. Consequently, there are no clear weakest areas to identify; every aspect surveyed received the highest possible rating, indicating a consistently strong performance. This suggests a well-rounded and highly desirable university experience.
This institution boasts impressive strengths in several key areas. Student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value all received excellent ratings of 4. Professors also garnered positive feedback with a score of 4. However, facilities represent a weaker point, scoring a 3, while the location received no rating.
This institution presents a uniform and notably low rating across all assessed aspects. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all received zero marks, indicating significant areas for improvement in every category. There are no standout strengths or discernible weaknesses as all areas are performing at the same low level.
This institution receives outstanding marks for its facilities, location, student life, accommodation, and overall value, all scoring a perfect five. Professors are also highly regarded, with a strong 4.5 rating. The university's weakest area is internationality, which received a 3.5, indicating room for growth in that aspect.
Nothing to show
About 56% of reviews are positive, highlighting academic opportunities, professors, and growth. A small portion (11.1%) of negative feedback mentions a lack of academic challenge and lazy professors.
With 27 reviews, ~93% are positive, highlighting strong extracurriculars, helpful teachers, and a pleasant atmosphere. Few negative comments exist, representing ~0% of feedback.
With a single review, the university received a perfect 5/5 rating, indicating ~100% positive sentiment. The positive feedback highlighted prestigious education and experienced marketing professors.
With an average rating of 4.25/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight the high quality physiotherapy program, creative curriculum, and emphasis on developing responsible, dedicated professionals. Facilities and learning tools are also noted as beneficial.
With one review, this institution has a perfect 5/5 average rating. The single review is highly positive, recommending the institution for its academic programs and their contribution to economic growth.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%) with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise academic excellence, qualified teachers, and facilities, along with a focus on humanities and values.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show