Universidad Externado de Colombia - UEC vs Pontificia Universidad Javeriana - PUJ vs Universidad Autónoma de Colombia - FUAC vs Fundación Universitaria Konrad Lorenz - KonradLorenz vs Fundación Universitaria San Martín - SANMARTIN

Side-by-side comparison from 49 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad Piloto de Colombia - UNIPILOTO (5.00)
Universidad Externado de Colombia - UEC: wins 0/7 categories
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana - PUJ: wins 2/7 categories
Universidad Autónoma de Colombia - FUAC: wins 0/7 categories
Fundación Universitaria Konrad Lorenz - KonradLorenz: wins 3/7 categories
Fundación Universitaria San Martín - SANMARTIN: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Piloto de Colombia - UNIPILOTO: wins 2/7 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Government and International Relations
Best programme: Civil Engineering
Best programme: Psychology
Best programme: Architecture
Category ratings
Facilities
4.62
4.74
Win
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Location
4.54
4.56
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Professors
4.69
4.68
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Internationality
4.31
4.42
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Student life
4.54
4.63
Win
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Value
4.62
4.47
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Accommodation
4.42
4.37
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality, specialized programs
  • +Excellent professors and diverse student body
  • +Opportunities for international experience and professional growth
  • +strong academic programs and well-qualified teachers
  • +holistic development through extracurriculars and soft skills
  • +supportive campus atmosphere and international community

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, relevant assignments and knowledgeable professors.
  • +Strong psychology program.

Nothing to show

  • +Emphasis on fostering individual creative development.
  • +High-quality education and professional training across diverse fields.
  • +Focus on personal growth and becoming better individuals.

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently criticized.
  • -Lack of support and unclear communication contribute to student dissatisfaction.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a problem.
  • -Poor communication and unsupportive staff are significant drawbacks.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative & management issues frustrate students.
  • -Outdated facilities hinder learning and comfort.
  • -Lack of transparency and communication causes dissatisfaction.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep are frequently cited.
  • -Inconsistent and unhelpful administrative support causes frustration.
  • -Overcrowded classes and lack of individual attention are common complaints.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates very strong performance, with its highest marks awarded to Professors (4.69) and its Facilities and Value (both 4.62). Location and Student Life also received excellent scores (4.54). The area with the lowest rating, though still respectable, is Internationality (4.31), followed closely by Accomodation (4.42).

Overall, this university garners strong ratings across multiple aspects. Facilities stand out as a significant strength, alongside excellent scores for professors and student life. While accommodations received the lowest rating, areas such as location, internationality, and value also present a positive picture, indicating a well-rounded experience.

Nothing to show

With excellent scores in accommodation and location, this institution shines. Its facilities, professors, and student life also received positive marks. However, its internationality received a more moderate rating, representing the weakest area. Overall, the university offers strong value.

Nothing to show

An impressive showing across several key areas, this institution excels particularly in its **professors and internationality**, both receiving perfect scores. Facilities, location, student life, and accommodation are all rated highly at a strong 4 out of 5. The university also scores well for **value**, indicating a positive return for students.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.61 average rating, students praise its quality programs, excellent facilities, and international opportunities for professional growth. No negative feedback was recorded among the 18 reviews.

With 27 reviews, ~93% are positive, highlighting strong extracurriculars, helpful teachers, and a pleasant atmosphere. Few negative comments exist, representing ~0% of feedback.

Nothing to show

With one review averaging 4/5 stars, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight great professors and practical assignments, though infrastructure issues were noted.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 5/5 stars, the 2 reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students appreciate the freedom to explore creative processes and the university's reputation for high-quality education across various fields.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
61%
85%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
4★
39%
7%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
7%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close