Kyiv International University - KyIU vs National Pedagogical Dragomanov University vs Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University vs Institute of Ecology, Economics and Law vs National Technical University of Ukraine Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute - NTUU KPI

Side-by-side comparison from 12 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Kyiv International University - KyIU: wins 1/5 categories
National Pedagogical Dragomanov University: wins 0/5 categories
Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University: wins 0/5 categories
Institute of Ecology, Economics and Law: wins 0/5 categories
National Technical University of Ukraine Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute - NTUU KPI: wins 0/5 categories
MIM Kyiv Business School - MIM: wins 3/5 categories
Kyiv Medical University - KMU: wins 1/5 categories
Category ratings
Facilities
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
5.00
4.50
Location
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.50
4.50
5.00
Professors
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
2.00
4.33
4.00
Internationality
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
2.50
4.67
Win
4.50
Student life
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
4.67
Win
4.50
Value
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
2.50
4.67
Win
4.50
Accommodation
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
2.50
4.67
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent and supportive teachers
  • +High-level organization and clear information
  • +Interesting and well-structured classes
  • +Positive atmosphere and friendly teachers
  • +Beautiful and quiet campus
  • +Supportive and manageable academic environment

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Strong technical foundation and useful experience
  • +Cool community and interesting social life
  • +Intense but manageable workload
  • +Comprehensive business understanding and accessible teaching
  • +Experiential learning, mentorship, and community events
  • +Real-world application and career preparation
  • +Affordable quality education
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Practical, well-structured curriculum
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations create confusion.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
  • -Course content is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management indifference to student well-being.
  • -Outdated facilities and ongoing maintenance problems.
  • -Poor administrative support and unclear communication are frequent complaints.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are significant drawbacks.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or lacking practical application.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a persistent problem.
  • -Inconsistent and unhelpful administrative support creates frustration.
  • -Lack of clear communication regarding policies and opportunities is common.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution excels in several key areas, achieving perfect scores for its facilities, professors, and location. Student life and internationality are also strong, both receiving a solid 4 out of 5. However, the university's accommodation offerings present a significant weakness, with a rating of 0. Overall, the value is rated positively at 4, indicating a generally well-regarded experience despite the accommodation issue.

This university exhibits a uniformly unimpressive profile, with zero ratings across all evaluated aspects. Consequently, no specific areas stand out as either strong or weak. The institution scores equally low in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value, suggesting a pervasive need for improvement in all these domains.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Analysis of this university's ratings reveals strengths in its **Location (4.5)**, standing out significantly. Conversely, the weakest areas appear to be **Professors (2)** and **Accomodation (2.5)**, both receiving considerably lower scores. Facilities and Student Life are rated moderately at 3, while Internationality and Value fall within the lower-average range.

This institution receives high marks across most categories, with Facilities standing out as its strongest area at a perfect 5. Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value are also exceptionally strong, each scoring 4.67. Professors represent the weakest area, though still solid at 4.33, with Location also performing well at 4.5.

This institution garners exceptional ratings across most categories, with perfect scores awarded for both **Location** and **Accomodation**. **Facilities**, **Student Life**, **Internationality**, and **Value** also received outstanding marks. The **Professors** area, while still strong, is the relatively weakest point at a solid 4 out of 5.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With 100% positive feedback and an average rating of 5/5, student reviews highlight excellent teachers and high-level organization. Positive comments also mention clear information and a supportive learning environment. No negative feedback was received.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating from one review, the university is described as beautiful, quiet, and having a fine atmosphere. Students found exams easy, teachers lighthearted, and facilities bright.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3.33/5, approximately 67% of reviews are positive, highlighting a cool community, useful experience, and strong technical foundation. Some negative feedback (33.3%) mentions areas for improvement such as building repairs and heating issues.

Students highly praise the comprehensive curriculum and excellent teaching staff, finding instruction accessible and engaging. Experiential learning opportunities and supportive faculty are frequently highlighted. No negative feedback was provided.

With an average rating of 4.5/5, all feedback is positive. Reviews highlight affordable education and a solid curriculum with a good balance of theory and practical experience. Faculty are described as knowledgeable and supportive.

Rating distribution
5★
100%
100%
0%
0%
33%
67%
50%
4★
0%
0%
0%
0%
33%
33%
50%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
33%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Strong Foundation for Future Healthcare Careers

Kyiv Medical University offers a solid educational foundation for aspiring healthcare professionals. The faculty is knowledgeable and supportive, providing valuable insights and guidance throughout the program. The curriculum is well-structured, combining theoretical knowledge with practical experience, which is essential for our future careers. Opinion: Overall, my experience at Kyiv Medical University has been positive. I appreciate the emphasis on hands-on training and the opportunities to interact with patients early in our studies. The campus environment is vibrant and fosters a sense of community among students. However, I feel that there could be improvements in certain administrative processes, which can sometimes be slow and cumbersome. Recommendation: I would recommend Kyiv Medical University to those looking to pursue a medical career, as it equips students with the necessary skills and knowledge. The supportive atmosphere and strong academic foundation make it a worthwhile choice for anyone passionate about healthcare.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close