Alliance Manchester Business School vs Birla Institute of Technology vs BI Norwegian Business School - BI vs Universidad Autónoma de Centro América - UACA vs NHH Norwegian School of Economics

Side-by-side comparison from 35 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Alliance Manchester Business School: wins 0/1 categories
Birla Institute of Technology: wins 0/1 categories
BI Norwegian Business School - BI: wins 0/1 categories
Universidad Autónoma de Centro América - UACA: wins 1/1 categories
NHH Norwegian School of Economics: wins 0/1 categories
Østfold University College: wins 0/1 categories
First Capital University of Bangladesh: wins 0/1 categories
Comparing
Manchester, The United Kingdom
4.10
Read more reviews
21 reviews
×
Best programme: International Management
Best programme: DBA Doctor Of Business Administration
Best programme: B.Sc. in International Business Administration
Best programme: Engineering Management
Best programme: Economics and Finance
Best programme: Electrical and Control Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
4.52
5.00
4.50
5.00
4.71
4.00
Not rated
Location
4.60
5.00
4.50
5.00
4.14
4.00
Not rated
Professors
3.90
5.00
4.50
5.00
4.43
3.00
Not rated
Internationality
4.76
4.00
4.00
5.00
Win
4.43
4.00
Not rated
Student life
4.32
5.00
4.00
5.00
4.29
5.00
Not rated
Value
4.10
5.00
3.00
5.00
4.14
4.00
Not rated
Accommodation
3.86
5.00
3.00
5.00
4.71
5.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Expert, passionate instructors and well-structured, relevant courses.
  • +Real-world experience through consulting projects.
  • +Strong student support and career preparation resources.
  • +excellent teaching & supportive faculty
  • +strong academic programs & campus facilities
  • +good placement opportunities
  • +Knowledgeable lecturers and strong academic environment
  • +Practical approach and industry connections
  • +Good location and food variety
  • +Excellent English language programs and practical skill acquisition.
  • +Opportunities for international experience and career advancement.
  • +Free tuition and diverse program options
  • +High quality education and international exchange opportunities
  • +Supportive environment and welcoming community
  • +Practical, real-world applications and project-based learning
  • +Balanced theory and lab work focus
  • +Strong curriculum in core engineering areas

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Outdated curriculum and irrelevant course content
  • -Inadequate facilities and poor infrastructure
  • -Insufficient teaching time due to project focus
  • -Poor administrative and management support is a recurring theme.
  • -Students frequently complain about outdated or inadequate facilities and resources.
  • -Communication gaps and a lack of transparency from the institution are significant concerns.
  • -Students dislike the lack of proper support and communication from staff.
  • -They often complain about outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources.
  • -Students express frustration with the curriculum and teaching methods being unengaging or irrelevant.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a significant concern for many students.
  • -Poor communication and lack of responsiveness from staff negatively impact the student experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring concern.
  • -Poor teaching quality and curriculum relevance are often criticized.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of student support and engagement from staff is a consistent complaint.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

The university garners exceptional ratings for its Internationality (4.76) and Location (4.59), indicating strengths in these aspects. Facilities also received a high score (4.50). Conversely, Accomodation (3.83) and Professors (3.93) received the lowest scores, suggesting these are areas for potential improvement. Student Life (4.34) and Value (4.08) fall in the middle range.

Across a comprehensive evaluation, this institution shines with perfect scores in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, and overall value. Its strongest areas are clearly these foundational aspects, offering an excellent experience for students. The only point for slight improvement is in internationality, which received a strong but not perfect rating of 4.

This institution demonstrates remarkable strengths, with exceptional ratings for its Facilities, Professors, and Location, all scoring an impressive 4.5. Student Life and Internationality also receive solid marks at 4. However, Accommodations and Value emerge as areas needing development, each receiving a lower score of 3.

Remarkably, this institution garnered perfect scores across all assessed areas. Its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all rated a flawless 5 out of 5. This indicates exceptional strength in every facet of the university experience, with no particular areas identified as weaker than others.

This institution receives exceptionally high marks for its facilities and accommodation, both scoring an outstanding 4.7. Professors and internationality are also strong points, with ratings of 4.4. Student life and value for money are rated at 4.3 and 4.1 respectively. The university's location is its weakest area, though still a respectable 4.1.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in student life and accommodation, both receiving perfect scores. Facilities and internationality are also highly regarded. While the location garners a strong rating, the professorial quality is the weakest area, scoring a 3. Overall, the university offers a commendable experience with particularly excellent offerings in its social and living environments.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting knowledgeable instructors, relevant coursework, and career support. A small portion of feedback points to issues with program structure and facilities.

All three reviews are positive, averaging 5/5 stars. Students praise the good education system, available teachers, and organized events. Some mention a need for improvement in placement opportunities and training.

With an average rating of 4/5, student feedback is highly positive. Reviewers consistently praise the great location, knowledgeable lecturers, and strong academic environment. Industry connections and a practical approach to education were also highlighted.

With one review, the average rating is 5/5. The feedback was entirely positive (~100%), highlighting strong satisfaction with the university. No negative comments were received.

Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~0% negative feedback. Students praise the free tuition and wide range of masters specializations, highlighting a conducive academic and diverse environment.

With a single review, the average rating is 4/5. This feedback highlights a solid and practical MSc in Electrical Engineering, emphasizing real-world applications, balanced theory and lab work, and project-based learning.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
52%
100%
0%
100%
29%
0%
0%
4★
24%
0%
100%
0%
57%
100%
0%
3★
14%
0%
0%
0%
14%
0%
0%
2★
5%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
5%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close