BI Norwegian Business School - BI vs University of Detroit Mercy vs University of Bari Aldo Moro - UniBa vs NHH Norwegian School of Economics vs National School Of Commerce And Management - ENCG
Side-by-side comparison from 16 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong industry connections and practical business education
- +International environment and balanced daily life
- +Excellent and varied food options
Nothing to show
- +Good overall quality of education
- +Recommends the institute
- +Free tuition and diverse program options
- +High quality education and international exchange opportunities
- +Supportive environment and welcoming community
- +High-quality academic programs and teaching
- +Excellent facilities and learning environment
- +Positive overall school experience
- +Supportive and approachable faculty
- +Well-designed and engaging curriculum
- +Positive and meaningful overall experience
- +Practical, real-world applications and project-based learning
- +Balanced theory and lab work focus
- +Strong curriculum in core engineering areas
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of student support are common complaints.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance
- -Lack of practical application and relevant coursework
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring concern.
- -Poor teaching quality and curriculum relevance are often criticized.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and student support frustrates learners.
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly implemented.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of student support and engagement from staff is a consistent complaint.
Impressive scores characterize this institution, particularly in its **facilities**, **location**, and **internationality**, all receiving perfect marks. Student experience is further bolstered by a commendable **student life** and a strong **professor** evaluation. However, **accommodation** presents a notable weakness with a score of 2, and the **value** proposition sits in the middle with a rating of 3.
Nothing to show
Performance in several key areas is quite strong, with Professors receiving the highest mark at 3.75. Facilities, Location, and Student Life are all rated a solid 3.5. Areas that could see improvement include Accomodation and Internationality, both scoring a 3. Value is rated at 3.25.
This institution receives exceptionally high marks for its facilities and accommodation, both scoring an outstanding 4.7. Professors and internationality are also strong points, with ratings of 4.4. Student life and value for money are rated at 4.3 and 4.1 respectively. The university's location is its weakest area, though still a respectable 4.1.
Overall, the university presents a solid academic experience. It shines in its **location**, which received a high rating. Areas like **facilities**, **professors**, **student life**, and **internationality** are rated moderately well, suggesting a good but not exceptional experience in these aspects. The weakest area appears to be **accommodation**, scoring significantly lower than other categories. **Value** is rated averagely.
This institution garners exceptional marks, particularly in the areas of **Professors** and **Location**, both achieving a perfect score of 5. Areas such as **Facilities**, **Student Life**, **Accommodation**, and **Internationality** are all rated solidly at 4, indicating a consistently positive experience. The university's **Value** also receives a respectable score of 4, rounding out its generally strong performance.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in student life and accommodation, both receiving perfect scores. Facilities and internationality are also highly regarded. While the location garners a strong rating, the professorial quality is the weakest area, scoring a 3. Overall, the university offers a commendable experience with particularly excellent offerings in its social and living environments.
This university receives a strong average rating of 4/5, with approximately 100% of feedback being positive. Students highlight excellent industry connections, an international environment, and practical business education. The campus offers a balanced daily experience and diverse dining options.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 3.25/5 from four reviews, positive sentiment dominates (~75%). One review highlights common timing issues but still recommends the institute. No negative feedback was provided.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~0% negative feedback. Students praise the free tuition and wide range of masters specializations, highlighting a conducive academic and diverse environment.
With an average rating of 4/5, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Reviews highlight the good teachers, administration, learning environment, and well-equipped facilities. No negative feedback was recorded.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, the sole review highlights a positive and meaningful experience. This feedback emphasizes a well-planned program and experienced, supportive faculty.
With a single review, the average rating is 4/5. This feedback highlights a solid and practical MSc in Electrical Engineering, emphasizing real-world applications, balanced theory and lab work, and project-based learning.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show