Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman vs Institute of Ecology, Economics and Law vs National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy vs MIM Kyiv Business School - MIM vs Bogomolets National Medical University - NMU
Side-by-side comparison from 13 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong academic programs and supportive faculty.
- +Positive student atmosphere and community.
- +Opportunities for practical experience and international exchange.
Nothing to show
- +High academic standards and international focus
- +Opportunities for practical learning and creativity
- +Strong reputation and European standards
- +Comprehensive business understanding and accessible teaching
- +Experiential learning, mentorship, and community events
- +Real-world application and career preparation
- +Expert instructors and engaging teaching methods.
- +Relevant and practical curriculum with up-to-date content.
- +Supportive learning environment and strong career services.
Nothing to show
- +Strong campus atmosphere and good friendships
- +Nice and approachable teachers
- -Pervasive corruption and a focus on extracting money.
- -Inadequate and unengaging teaching from unmotivated lecturers.
- -Wasted time with little real value gained.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are major concerns.
- -Unresponsive and unhelpful support staff are a recurring complaint.
- -Poor administrative support and unclear communication are frequent complaints.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are significant drawbacks.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or lacking practical application.
- -Excessive workload and focus on written assignments over practical skills.
- -Ineffective and demanding remote learning practices.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are consistently frustrating.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of communication and support from staff is a major concern.
This institution demonstrates particular strengths in **Student Life**, receiving a high rating of 4.5. **Location** and **Professors** are also well-regarded, both scoring 4. **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 2.5. **Facilities**, **Internationality**, and **Value** fall within the mid-range of scores.
Nothing to show
This institution excels particularly in areas like Student Life (4.6), Location (4.5), and Facilities (4.3), indicating a vibrant and well-situated campus environment. Conversely, Accomodation and Internationality received the lowest scores, both at 3. Despite these areas, Value stands out with a perfect 5, suggesting a strong return on investment. Professor ratings are a moderate 3.7.
This institution receives high marks across most categories, with Facilities standing out as its strongest area at a perfect 5. Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value are also exceptionally strong, each scoring 4.67. Professors represent the weakest area, though still solid at 4.33, with Location also performing well at 4.5.
This institution demonstrates a strong showing in its location, which received the highest rating. Conversely, its facilities are the weakest point, scoring significantly lower than other aspects. Student life and value also received favorable marks, while professors, accommodation, and internationality fall in the middle range.
Nothing to show
Consistently scoring a perfect 5 across all metrics, this institution demonstrates exceptional strength in every surveyed area. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value are all rated outstandingly. There are no discernible weak areas, as the university achieves top marks uniformly. This indicates a uniformly excellent and well-rounded educational experience.
With an average rating of 3.25/5, feedback is split evenly between positive and negative. Students praised good staff and interesting programs, while others cited corruption and unengaging teaching.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.5/5, 100% of feedback is positive. Students praise educational quality, practical lessons, encouraged critical thinking, and opportunities for creativity.
Students highly praise the comprehensive curriculum and excellent teaching staff, finding instruction accessible and engaging. Experiential learning opportunities and supportive faculty are frequently highlighted. No negative feedback was provided.
With an average rating of 2/5, two out of three reviews are negative (~67%). Students report excessive assignments and a focus on online tasks over practical learning.
Nothing to show
The single review is highly positive, rating the university 5/5. The student enjoyed the atmosphere and appreciated the nice teachers, strongly recommending it.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
A certain hierarchy reigns in the university in which professors and the dean’s office are considered gods, and students and laboratory assistants are secondary characters. Despite this, there are people that ready to teach and help you I consider the opportunity to become more independent as a plus in NMU. Many faculties and campuses can also be attributed to the merits of university. The complexity of learning unites students so that you can turn a blind eye to shortcomings…
Nothing to show
Nothing to show