emlyon business school vs Manipal Academy of Higher Education - MAHE - MU vs L'École de Design Nantes Atlantique vs Rajasthan Technical University - RTU vs London School of Commerce - LSC

Side-by-side comparison from 189 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Rajasthan Technical University - RTU (4.60)
emlyon business school: wins 3/7 categories
Manipal Academy of Higher Education - MAHE - MU: wins 1/7 categories
L'École de Design Nantes Atlantique: wins 0/7 categories
Rajasthan Technical University - RTU: wins 2/7 categories
London School of Commerce - LSC: wins 1/7 categories
upGrad: wins 0/7 categories
Ecole Intuit Lab: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
Best programme: Dental Surgery
Best programme: Art and Design
Best programme: Bachelor of Software Engineering
London, The United Kingdom
3.80
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Administration
London, The United Kingdom
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Marseille, France
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.22
Win
4.12
4.00
4.00
3.25
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.66
3.91
3.00
4.00
4.75
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.12
4.13
Win
4.00
4.00
3.25
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
4.63
Win
3.17
4.00
3.33
3.50
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.30
4.30
3.00
4.33
Win
3.75
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.49
Win
3.96
4.00
3.67
2.75
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
4.00
3.68
4.00
4.33
Win
2.00
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical, international focus and diverse student body.
  • +Strong career support and professional experience opportunities.
  • +Diverse program options and personal project development.
  • +Diverse student body and global community
  • +Strong academic programs and industry-relevant knowledge
  • +Supportive faculty and excellent placement support
  • +Supportive environment & welcoming community
  • +Prestigious European university for design
  • +Focus on practical application over theory
  • +Strong educational programs and supportive faculty.
  • +Good facilities for learning and extracurricular activities.
  • +Decent placement opportunities.
  • +Accessible resources and supportive faculty
  • +Engaging learning environment and quality instruction
  • +Opportunities for exposure and growth

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to dissatisfaction.
  • -High tuition fees and poor job placement rates are a major concern.
  • -Limited and often damaged recreational facilities detract from the student experience.
  • -The university offers a poor value for money regarding services provided.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Ineffective teaching and curriculum create learning difficulties.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are common concerns.
  • -Poor communication and a lack of student support are recurring problems.
  • -Administrative and communication issues cause stress.
  • -Lack of support is a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates a generally positive standing, with its strongest areas being **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.6. **Student Life** and **Value** also received high marks, around 4.3 and 4.49 respectively. The **Facilities** and **Professors** are rated well, in the low 4s. **Accomodation** appears to be the relatively weakest area, with a score of 4.

This university demonstrates notable strengths in **Student Life**, boasting a high rating. Areas such as **Facilities** and **Professors** also receive favorable scores. Conversely, **Internationality** and **Accomodation** are identified as areas with lower ratings, suggesting potential for improvement in these aspects. The university presents a mixed but generally positive outlook across its evaluated components.

Offering a well-rounded experience, this institution excels in its facilities, professor quality, accommodation, and internationality, all receiving a strong rating of 4. While student life and location are rated a respectable 3, these areas represent opportunities for improvement compared to its more robust aspects. Overall, the university presents a very positive offering.

This institution achieves strong performance in several key areas, with student life and accommodation particularly well-regarded. Facilities and professors also receive consistently good scores. However, internationality is a notable weaker point, along with value for money, which is rated moderately. Overall, the university presents a solid offering, with opportunities for improvement in its global reach and perceived economic benefit.

This institution shines brightest in its location, receiving a near-perfect score. Student life and internationality are also areas of moderate strength. Conversely, accommodation stands out as a significant weakness, along with the perceived value of the education. Ratings for facilities and professors are average.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~90% 4-5 stars) with an average rating of 4.53/5. Students praise the academic rigor, practical and international focus, and diverse student body.

With a 4.11/5 average rating from 128 reviews, ~83% praise the university for its diverse student body, supportive environment, and robust academic programs. A small minority (~0.8%) found it expensive with limited recreational facilities and placements.

The university receives strong positive feedback, with 100% of reviews being positive. Students highlight a welcoming environment for international students and supportive teachers. Some desire more challenging main projects and theoretical lectures.

All five reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.6/5 stars. Students praise academics, supportive faculty, and good library/sports facilities. A recurring theme suggests a need for improved practical exposure and industry connections.

The university receives predominantly positive feedback (~75%) with students praising supportive instructors and good facilities. A smaller portion of reviews (~25%) notes administrative delays and communication issues.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
63%
29%
0%
60%
50%
0%
0%
4★
27%
54%
100%
40%
25%
0%
0%
3★
10%
16%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
25%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close