American University of Beirut vs Lebanese American University - LAU vs American University of Science and Technology - AUST vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris vs Lebanese International University - LIU
Side-by-side comparison from 78 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High-quality faculty and rigorous academic programs
- +Supportive student services and strong community atmosphere
- +Vibrant campus life and diverse extracurricular activities
- +Supportive and accessible faculty
- +Diverse student community and collaborative environment
- +Strong academic foundation and practical learning opportunities
- +Supportive and caring faculty
- +Comprehensive and diverse course offerings
- +Positive and friendly learning environment
- +Exceptional chef instructors and curriculum quality.
- +Strong emphasis on skill development and practical experience.
- +Valuable international reputation and alumni network.
- +Excellent, knowledgeable, and approachable instructors.
- +Affordable education and diverse programs.
- +Supportive and family-like university environment.
- +Diverse course offerings and professional faculty
- +Well-maintained campus facilities and vibrant academic atmosphere
- +Positive post-graduation reputation
- +Excellent academic programs and faculty support
- +Supportive and accessible campus environment
- +Career preparation and guidance
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and unresponsive faculty create a negative experience.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently mentioned.
- -Lack of resources and support are significant concerns.
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a recurring complaint.
- -Negative feedback points to unsupportive or ineffective teaching.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Poor communication and administrative support.
- -Lack of practical application and relevance in coursework.
- -Financial prioritization over education and weak global recognition of certificates.
- -Unpleasant study environment and lack of freedom to express opinions.
- -Poor teaching quality and irrelevant curriculum.
- -Negative learning environment and lack of practical application.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of maintenance.
- -Ineffective teaching and curriculum.
- -Poor administrative support and communication.
This university performs exceptionally well in its location, earning a high rating of 4.56. Student life and professors also receive strong scores, indicating positive experiences in these areas. Accommodation stands out as the weakest point, with a rating of 3.86, while other aspects like facilities, internationality, and value fall within a solid range.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in student life, receiving a high rating of 4.58. Location and facilities also scored well, both above 4.3. Conversely, internationality and accommodation appear to be areas for potential improvement, with scores of 3.5 and 3.92 respectively. The university's value for money and professor quality are rated moderately.
This institution excels notably in its teaching quality, boasting a perfect score for professors, and also earns high marks for its vibrant student life, international presence, and desirable location. The value proposition is also exceptionally strong. Conversely, accommodation and facilities represent the areas with the lowest ratings, indicating room for improvement in these aspects of the university experience.
Performance varies across key aspects of university life. Outstanding ratings were awarded for Location (4.75) and Professors (4.625), alongside strong marks for Internationality (4.625) and Facilities (4.5). Student Life (3.875) and Value (4.125) received good scores. Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its location, which received the highest rating. Facilities and accommodation also scored highly, reflecting positive student experiences in these areas. Conversely, internationality emerged as the weakest point, suggesting room for improvement in global engagement or diversity. Student life and value for money present a mixed, but generally favorable, picture.
An assessment of the university reveals a generally positive picture, with notable strengths in its academic staff. Professors received the highest rating at 3.83. Areas such as facilities, location, and student life are rated at a solid 3.5. Conversely, accommodation and internationality present as areas for potential improvement, both scoring 3.17. The overall value of the education is also well-regarded at 3.67.
This institution demonstrates a well-rounded profile, with student life receiving the highest possible score of 5.0. Facilities and accommodation also stand out with excellent ratings of 4.75. Conversely, internationality is the weakest area, scoring 4.25, though still a strong performance. Professors, location, and value all achieve a solid 4.5.
With ~85% of feedback being positive, students praise the high-quality education and supportive professors. They also appreciate the engaging campus life and comprehensive curriculum. There is virtually no negative feedback.
Approximately 83% of reviews are positive, highlighting engaging courses, supportive faculty, and academic excellence. Some mention slow bureaucracy and chaotic registration as minor issues.
All four reviews are highly positive, averaging 4.75/5 stars. Recurring themes highlight a dynamic, supportive learning environment, excellent and caring faculty, and a unique, friendly student life. No negative feedback was provided.
All eight student reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.63/5. Students highly praise the knowledgeable instructors, quality curriculum, and enriching learning experience.
~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting knowledgeable and supportive instructors, as well as a positive learning environment. A small portion (~6%) of negative feedback mentions concerns about finances and the value of certificates.
With an average rating of 3.17/5 from 6 reviews, roughly 67% of feedback is positive, praising professional faculty and diverse course offerings. About 17% of reviews are negative, citing poor lecture quality and a lack of practical application.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students praise academic excellence, helpful faculty, and a supportive learning environment. There are no reported negative reviews.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
