Buryat State University - BSU vs Admiral Makarov National University of Shipbuilding - NUOS vs MIM Kyiv Business School - MIM vs Universidad Iberoamericana - UNIBE - UNIBE vs State University of Malang - UM

Side-by-side comparison from 10 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Admiral Makarov National University of Shipbuilding - NUOS (5.00)
Buryat State University - BSU: wins 0/6 categories
Admiral Makarov National University of Shipbuilding - NUOS: wins 0/6 categories
MIM Kyiv Business School - MIM: wins 4/6 categories
Universidad Iberoamericana - UNIBE - UNIBE: wins 0/6 categories
State University of Malang - UM: wins 2/6 categories
Petro Mohyla Black Sea National University - PMBSNU: wins 0/6 categories
Nong Lam University: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: MBA
Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: English Language Teaching
Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.17
Not rated
Not rated
Location
Not rated
Not rated
4.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
Not rated
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
4.67
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
Not rated
Not rated
4.67
Win
Not rated
3.83
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
Not rated
Not rated
4.67
Win
Not rated
4.60
Not rated
Not rated
Value
Not rated
Not rated
4.67
Not rated
4.67
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
Not rated
Not rated
4.67
Win
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros

Nothing to show

  • +Impressive, research-engaged professors and high-level theoretical preparation.
  • +Good programs and supportive class teachers.
  • +Comprehensive business understanding and accessible teaching
  • +Experiential learning, mentorship, and community events
  • +Real-world application and career preparation

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive and inspiring faculty
  • +Affordable cost of living and study
  • +Positive and student-friendly city environment

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Ineffective teaching and unengaging curriculum lead to dissatisfaction.
  • -Poor administrative support and unclear communication are frequent complaints.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are significant drawbacks.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or lacking practical application.

Nothing to show

  • -Inadequate and poorly maintained facilities, especially restrooms.
  • -Insufficient parking availability.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Nothing to show

This institution presents a uniform set of ratings, with no particular area standing out as exceptionally strong or weak. All surveyed aspects, including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, have received identical scores. This suggests a consistent, though unexceptional, performance across the board, offering no clear strengths or weaknesses to highlight based on the provided data.

This institution receives high marks across most categories, with Facilities standing out as its strongest area at a perfect 5. Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value are also exceptionally strong, each scoring 4.67. Professors represent the weakest area, though still solid at 4.33, with Location also performing well at 4.5.

Nothing to show

This institution receives very strong marks in several key areas, notably Professors and Value, both scoring an impressive 4.67. Student Life also garners significant praise at 4.6. Location stands out as a perfect 5. Facilities and Accomodation are rated well, around 4.17 and 4.33 respectively. The area with the lowest rating is Internationality, at 3.83.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nothing to show

With a single review, this university receives a perfect 5/5 average rating. The feedback highlights impressive professorial staff and high-level theoretical preparation, though it notes inadequate practical training.

Students highly praise the comprehensive curriculum and excellent teaching staff, finding instruction accessible and engaging. Experiential learning opportunities and supportive faculty are frequently highlighted. No negative feedback was provided.

Nothing to show

~83% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable and supportive lecturers, and a nurturing learning environment. Some students also highlight affordable living costs and a green, well-maintained campus. A small portion (~17%) of negative feedback points to inadequate facilities, including poor-quality toilets and a lack of parking.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
100%
67%
0%
83%
0%
0%
4★
0%
0%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
17%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close