Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam Technical University - UPTU vs Integral University vs Isabella Thoburn College vs University Of Lucknow vs Glocal University - UP

Side-by-side comparison from 16 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Integral University (4.70)
Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam Technical University - UPTU: wins 0/7 categories
Integral University: wins 1/7 categories
Isabella Thoburn College: wins 0/7 categories
University Of Lucknow: wins 1/7 categories
Glocal University - UP: wins 5/7 categories
King George's Medical University - AVA: wins 0/7 categories
Babu Banarasi Das University - BBDU: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Global MBA
Lucknow, India
4.70
Top
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Science and Engineering
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Management and Communication
Best programme: Commerce
Category ratings
Facilities
3.63
4.33
Win
Not rated
3.50
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Location
3.92
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Win
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
3.50
4.67
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
3.06
4.33
Not rated
2.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
3.79
4.67
Not rated
3.50
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Value
3.51
4.67
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.63
4.67
Not rated
2.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical, industry-focused curriculum and hands-on project building
  • +Strong faculty guidance and support for learning
  • +Positive campus environment, good culture, and excellent placement opportunities
  • +Supportive faculty and conducive learning environment
  • +Adequate facilities and opportunities for practical exploration
  • +Equal treatment and focus on academic and professional growth

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive and inclusive community
  • +Opportunities for growth and personal development
  • +Supportive faculty and individual attention
  • +Diverse and engaging student body

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor campus conditions are frequently mentioned.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support for students is a recurring concern.
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology are a common complaint.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or lacking practical application.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues create frequent problems.
  • -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Communication from the institution is inconsistent and unclear.
  • -Poor course structure and confusing administration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of necessary resources.
  • -Limited career support and unclear future prospects.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This university's ratings showcase a generally positive student experience. Location stands out as the strongest area, while Internationality received the lowest score. Facilities, Student Life, and Accommodation were all rated well, falling within a similar range. Professors and Value also received solid, mid-range scores, indicating areas for potential improvement alongside existing strengths.

With impressive scores in several key areas, this institution excels, particularly in the quality of its professors, student life, accommodation, and overall value, all receiving a high rating. Facilities and internationality are also strong points. However, the location received a rating of zero, indicating a significant weakness in this aspect.

Nothing to show

Overall, this university presents a mixed bag of strengths and weaknesses. Its strongest points lie with its **Professors** and **Location**, both receiving solid ratings of 4. Students also appear satisfied with **Facilities** and **Student Life**, scoring 3.5 in these areas. However, significant room for improvement exists in **Accomodation** and **Internationality**, with both rated at a low 2. The **Value** is perceived as moderate, earning a 3.

This institution receives exceptionally high marks in several key areas, notably Professors, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value, all scoring a perfect 5. Facilities are rated well at 4. The weakest area, according to these ratings, is Location, with a score of 3. Overall, the university presents a very strong offering with minimal drawbacks.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

~90% of reviews are positive, highlighting rewarding experiences, practical curricula, and supportive faculty. ~10% of reviews express dissatisfaction, with one mentioning issues like mark sheet errors.

Students report a positive experience, highlighting supportive faculty, creative peers, and adequate facilities like laboratories. The university is praised for its conducive learning environment and equitable treatment of students, with a few minor areas for improvement noted.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3.5/5, student feedback is largely positive (~50%). One review noted feeling overwhelmed initially but later found confidence and belonging through involvement in clubs and competitions. No negative reviews were recorded.

With an average rating of 4/5, positive feedback (~100%) highlights supportive faculty and a diverse student body. There is no negative feedback.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
50%
67%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
40%
33%
0%
50%
100%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
10%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close