emlyon business school vs Manipal Academy of Higher Education - MAHE - MU vs Chandigarh Group of Colleges - GCG vs Chitkara University vs Guru Nanak Dev University - GNDU

Side-by-side comparison from 215 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
emlyon business school: wins 0/3 categories
Manipal Academy of Higher Education - MAHE - MU: wins 0/3 categories
Chandigarh Group of Colleges - GCG: wins 0/3 categories
Chitkara University: wins 0/3 categories
Guru Nanak Dev University - GNDU: wins 0/3 categories
Ramgarhia Institute of Engineering and Technology: wins 0/3 categories
TETR College of Business: wins 3/3 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
Best programme: Dental Surgery
Best programme: Computer Application
Best programme: Clinical Research
Best programme: Journalism and Mass Communication
Best programme: Engineering Technologies
New York City, United States
5.00
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Management & Technology
Category ratings
Facilities
4.22
4.12
4.00
4.23
4.00
3.00
4.50
Win
Location
4.66
3.91
5.00
3.95
4.55
5.00
4.50
Professors
4.12
4.13
3.00
3.95
4.18
3.00
5.00
Win
Internationality
4.63
3.17
5.00
3.90
3.36
1.00
5.00
Student life
4.30
4.30
3.00
4.45
4.36
5.00
5.00
Value
4.49
3.96
3.00
3.78
4.18
5.00
5.00
Accommodation
4.00
3.68
2.00
3.58
3.73
3.00
4.50
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical, international focus and diverse student body.
  • +Strong career support and professional experience opportunities.
  • +Diverse program options and personal project development.
  • +Diverse student body and global community
  • +Strong academic programs and industry-relevant knowledge
  • +Supportive faculty and excellent placement support
  • +Strong faculty & diverse courses
  • +Positive campus environment & student involvement
  • +Good placement records & cost-effectiveness
  • +Excellent academic quality and diverse programs.
  • +Supportive staff and conducive learning environment.
  • +Strong infrastructure, facilities, and extracurricular opportunities.
  • +Supportive faculty and excellent academic programs
  • +Modern infrastructure and well-equipped facilities
  • +Opportunities for cultural activities and career placement
  • +Affordable tuition and accessible programs
  • +Diverse and multicultural student body
  • +Supportive and approachable faculty
  • +Experiential learning and entrepreneurship opportunities
  • +Direct access to industry leaders (CXOs, CEOs)
  • +Valuable networking and lifelong friendships
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to dissatisfaction.
  • -High tuition fees and poor job placement rates are a major concern.
  • -Limited and often damaged recreational facilities detract from the student experience.
  • -The university offers a poor value for money regarding services provided.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources impact the learning environment.
  • -Lack of clear communication and student support is a recurring problem.
  • -Subpar education quality and uninterested professors.
  • -Outdated teaching methods and disengagement.
  • -Limited resources and theoretical learning.
  • -Lack of practical, real-life experiences.
  • -Language barriers and poor induction for foreign students.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Facilities are consistently described as outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Course content and teaching quality often fall short of expectations.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a major frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are common complaints.
  • -Poor communication and lack of transparency from the institution are frequently mentioned.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates a generally positive standing, with its strongest areas being **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.6. **Student Life** and **Value** also received high marks, around 4.3 and 4.49 respectively. The **Facilities** and **Professors** are rated well, in the low 4s. **Accomodation** appears to be the relatively weakest area, with a score of 4.

This university demonstrates notable strengths in **Student Life**, boasting a high rating. Areas such as **Facilities** and **Professors** also receive favorable scores. Conversely, **Internationality** and **Accomodation** are identified as areas with lower ratings, suggesting potential for improvement in these aspects. The university presents a mixed but generally positive outlook across its evaluated components.

With excellent marks in both Location and Internationality, this institution truly shines in these areas. However, Accommodation is identified as a significant weakness, receiving the lowest rating. Other aspects like Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Value received moderate scores, indicating room for improvement across these categories.

This university garners high marks for student life, with a rating of 4.45, and facilities also score well at 4.23. Conversely, accommodation presents the lowest score at 3.58. Other aspects like professors, location, internationality, and value fall within a respectable mid-range, indicating areas for potential improvement alongside commendable strengths.

This institution performs exceptionally well in several key areas. Its strongest ratings are for **Location** (4.55) and **Student Life** (4.36), indicating positive experiences in these domains. **Facilities** and **Value** also received solid scores of 4.18. The areas that scored lower, suggesting room for improvement, are **Internationality** (3.36) and **Accomodation** (3.73).

This institution excels in areas such as **Location** and **Student Life**, both receiving perfect scores. The **Value** offered also stands out, earning a top rating. Conversely, its **Internationality** is a significant weakness, scoring only a single point. Ratings for **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Accomodation** are moderate, all receiving a score of three.

Across a range of metrics, the university demonstrates exceptional strengths, particularly in its Professors, Student Life, Internationality, and overall Value, all receiving perfect scores. Location, Facilities, and Accommodations also stand out with high ratings. While no specific area received a low score, the consistency across the board suggests a well-rounded institution with particularly strong offerings in teaching quality and student experience.

Reviews summary
Highlights

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~90% 4-5 stars) with an average rating of 4.53/5. Students praise the academic rigor, practical and international focus, and diverse student body.

With a 4.11/5 average rating from 128 reviews, ~83% praise the university for its diverse student body, supportive environment, and robust academic programs. A small minority (~0.8%) found it expensive with limited recreational facilities and placements.

With a 4.25/5 average, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Recurring themes include good teachers, culture, placements, and a cost-effective environment, though some suggest a greater practical approach.

With a 4.24/5 average, ~94% of reviews are positive, praising quality education, good infrastructure, and facilities. A small ~6% express dissatisfaction with education quality and teaching methods.

Over 90% of reviews praise a supportive learning environment, well-organized academics, and good facilities. A small amount of feedback notes limited practical experience and potential language barriers for foreign students.

The single review is highly positive, rating the university 5/5. It praises affordable prices and access to sought-after programs like Civil Engineering. Positive aspects also include a multicultural environment, approachable professors, and convenient city-center location.

All three reviews are highly positive, averaging 5/5 stars. Students highlight real-world business experience, including product development and profit generation, and valuable learning from industry leaders. They also praise opportunities for international collaboration and lifelong friendships.

Rating distribution
5★
63%
29%
25%
41%
55%
100%
100%
4★
27%
54%
75%
53%
36%
0%
0%
3★
10%
16%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
1%
0%
0%
9%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
6%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

A good placement tracker

its a good college , great culture , great teachers , great placement record , cost effective . but needs practical approach instead of theory , needs good experience corporate for better learning . environment is great with good facalities . rest is great to learn and study.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Loving it here!

Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close