University of Tuzla - UNTZ vs European University Kallos Tuzla - EU Kallos Tuzla vs International Business Information Academy - IPIA vs University of Texas at Dallas - UTD vs The College of Theology and Social Sciences - CTSS
Side-by-side comparison from 139 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High-quality, professional, and helpful professors
- +Good educational programs fulfilling expectations
- +Supportive environment and career prospects
- +Friendly and accessible professors
- +Good learning opportunities
- +Modern facilities and location
- +Quality education with supportive staff and professors
- +Modern and well-equipped facilities and classrooms
- +Strong academic programs and expert faculty
- +Vibrant campus life and student community
- +Career development support and industry connections
Nothing to show
- +Professional and supportive lecturers
- +Clean and secure campus environment
- +Opportunities for learning and student interaction
- +engaging & supportive instructors
- +comprehensive and relevant curriculum
- +career-focused opportunities
- -Administrative and organizational issues are pervasive.
- -Lack of practical application and outdated facilities are significant problems.
- -Some professors exhibit poor teaching methods and rudeness.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited as a major source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff leave students feeling neglected.
- -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources hinder learning.
- -The curriculum feels irrelevant, lacking practical application and depth.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently criticized.
- -Communication breakdowns and lack of transparency cause dissatisfaction.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a common complaint.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is frequently mentioned.
- -Elitist and distant faculty.
- -Management and administrative problems.
Regarding university performance, professors and location stand out as the strongest aspects, both receiving ratings around 4.0. Student life and value are also well-regarded, scoring above 3.5. Areas for potential improvement include facilities, accommodation, and internationality, which are rated in the low 3s. Overall, the university demonstrates a solid but varied performance across these key metrics.
This academic institution received consistently low ratings across all surveyed categories. Areas like facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all scored zero. Consequently, there are no standout strengths or weaknesses to highlight, as the university appears to perform poorly across the board according to this assessment.
This institution demonstrates outstanding performance, achieving a perfect score in Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value. Its strongest areas are clearly these aspects, reflecting a highly positive student experience and excellent offerings. The Facilities rating, while still very good at 4, represents the only slight area for potential improvement within an otherwise exceptional overall assessment.
This university garners strong marks, particularly excelling in its **Location**, which received the highest rating. **Facilities** and **Value** also received impressive scores. **Student Life** stands out as the area with the lowest, though still solid, rating. Other categories like **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Internationality** all performed very well.
Nothing to show
This institution receives commendations for its professors and value, with both scoring above 4.0. Conversely, facilities and accommodation ratings are the lowest among the surveyed aspects. Student life, internationality, and location also fall within a similar moderate range.
This institution demonstrates a commendable balance in its evaluation, with its **location** standing out as a significant strength, earning a perfect score. Areas like **internationality** and **value** also perform well, receiving solid ratings. Conversely, **facilities**, **professors**, **student life**, and **accommodation** are areas where the university received moderate scores, indicating potential for improvement.
Around 46% of reviews are positive, praising high-quality staff and curriculum, with some noting occasional subjective grading. About 17% are negative, citing poor organization and lack of practical application. The average rating is 3.49/5.
With an average rating of 4.33/5 based on 3 reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students praise the modern design, great location, and the kindness and professionalism of professors and staff. Some suggest improvements for certain faculties regarding curriculum and practical experience.
The sole review is highly positive, awarding 5 out of 5 stars. Students praise the quality education, supportive professors, and modern, well-equipped facilities. No negative feedback was recorded.
With 8 out of 9 reviews being positive, students highlight UTD's strong research, expert faculty, and vibrant campus life. The university is praised for its career development opportunities and diverse, inclusive community.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.38/5 from 24 reviews, approximately 100% of feedback is positive. Recurring themes highlight clean campuses, professional teachers, and abundant learning courses.
The single review provided is negative, rating the university 2 out of 5 stars. It highlights an elitist faculty with distant professors, despite mentioning some attentive ones. The reviewer also noted the university's high status, great location, and a welcoming city.
The price for the master's is insanely expensive considering what it has to offer. I got an MA in translation and interpreting, but sadly, my colleagues and I barely had any practical exercises in these subjects. Most of the professors were alright though. Bearing in mind where they work, most of them try to do their best. The university is politicized, since the politicians play with it like with ping-pong balls. The only aim is to employ their own people, no matter how incompetent they are, instead of the people who are actually able to do proper work. Anyone in their right mind (since I was not one of those people) will opt to study abroad and obtain the MA degree somewhere else. I paid 2500 KM so I can have a degree from an XY rated university, instead of studying in, say, Germany or Austria, where the prices are identical, or even lower, and where students can also get real scholarships if they're good enough. Once again, a waste of money. If only they (politicians) invested all that money in infrastructure and better equipment, the university would be a much nicer place and the main Uni building would not have 40 YO doors and windows.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show