Ecole Nationale Polytechnique de Constantine - ENPC vs University of Tuzla - UNTZ vs European University Kallos Tuzla - EU Kallos Tuzla vs International Business Information Academy - IPIA vs ESSCA School of Management
Side-by-side comparison from 138 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
Nothing to show
- +High-quality, professional, and helpful professors
- +Good educational programs fulfilling expectations
- +Supportive environment and career prospects
- +Friendly and accessible professors
- +Good learning opportunities
- +Modern facilities and location
- +Quality education with supportive staff and professors
- +Modern and well-equipped facilities and classrooms
- +Strong academic programs with international focus and practical experience.
- +Approachable and supportive teachers fostering a positive learning environment.
- +Vibrant campus life and opportunities for personal and professional growth.
Nothing to show
- +Engaging and effective teaching methods
- +Supportive and accessible instructors
- +Excellent career development support
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and organizational issues are pervasive.
- -Lack of practical application and outdated facilities are significant problems.
- -Some professors exhibit poor teaching methods and rudeness.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited as a major source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff leave students feeling neglected.
- -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources hinder learning.
- -The curriculum feels irrelevant, lacking practical application and depth.
- -Ineffective and unprepared professors with poor language skills.
- -Poor organization and irrelevant, expensive courses.
- -Lack of student engagement and focus on partying.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are prevalent.
- -Outdated facilities and limited technology are concerns.
- -The class system is considered insufficient.
Nothing to show
Regarding university performance, professors and location stand out as the strongest aspects, both receiving ratings around 4.0. Student life and value are also well-regarded, scoring above 3.5. Areas for potential improvement include facilities, accommodation, and internationality, which are rated in the low 3s. Overall, the university demonstrates a solid but varied performance across these key metrics.
This academic institution received consistently low ratings across all surveyed categories. Areas like facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all scored zero. Consequently, there are no standout strengths or weaknesses to highlight, as the university appears to perform poorly across the board according to this assessment.
This institution demonstrates outstanding performance, achieving a perfect score in Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value. Its strongest areas are clearly these aspects, reflecting a highly positive student experience and excellent offerings. The Facilities rating, while still very good at 4, represents the only slight area for potential improvement within an otherwise exceptional overall assessment.
Evaluations reveal a university with particularly strong offerings in **location** and **student life**, both exceeding a 4.1 rating. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the weakest area, scoring significantly lower at 3.41. Other aspects like professors, facilities, internationality, and value fall within a solid mid-to-high range, generally between 3.75 and 3.94.
Nothing to show
This institution excels in academics and social engagement, with particularly strong ratings for **Professors** and **Student Life**. Conversely, its weakest areas are **Location** and **Accomodation**, both receiving the lowest possible scores. Facilities and overall value are rated moderately. Internationality is a mid-range strength, indicating a solid but not outstanding global presence.
Nothing to show
Around 46% of reviews are positive, praising high-quality staff and curriculum, with some noting occasional subjective grading. About 17% are negative, citing poor organization and lack of practical application. The average rating is 3.49/5.
With an average rating of 4.33/5 based on 3 reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students praise the modern design, great location, and the kindness and professionalism of professors and staff. Some suggest improvements for certain faculties regarding curriculum and practical experience.
The sole review is highly positive, awarding 5 out of 5 stars. Students praise the quality education, supportive professors, and modern, well-equipped facilities. No negative feedback was recorded.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting enriching experiences, approachable teachers, and good knowledge transfer. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions unprepared professors and irrelevant courses.
Nothing to show
The single review (100% negative) suggests administrative issues despite brilliant teachers and good courses. The student experienced a slightly poor administration system.
Nothing to show
The price for the master's is insanely expensive considering what it has to offer. I got an MA in translation and interpreting, but sadly, my colleagues and I barely had any practical exercises in these subjects. Most of the professors were alright though. Bearing in mind where they work, most of them try to do their best. The university is politicized, since the politicians play with it like with ping-pong balls. The only aim is to employ their own people, no matter how incompetent they are, instead of the people who are actually able to do proper work. Anyone in their right mind (since I was not one of those people) will opt to study abroad and obtain the MA degree somewhere else. I paid 2500 KM so I can have a degree from an XY rated university, instead of studying in, say, Germany or Austria, where the prices are identical, or even lower, and where students can also get real scholarships if they're good enough. Once again, a waste of money. If only they (politicians) invested all that money in infrastructure and better equipment, the university would be a much nicer place and the main Uni building would not have 40 YO doors and windows.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Overall, I had a positive experience at ESSCA. The programme is well organized and provides a solid foundation in business and management. The courses were generally of good quality and covered a broad range of topics, helping students develop both academic knowledge and practical skills. One of the aspects I appreciated most was the international exchange during the third year. ESSCA has a good network of partner universities, and the opportunity to study abroad was a valuable part of the programme. Student life is also a real strength of the school. The associative environment is active and offers many opportunities to get involved outside the classroom, meet new people, and gain additional experience. Like any programme, some courses were more engaging than others, but overall I found the experience enriching and would recommend it to students looking for a business school with a strong international dimension and a good balance between academics and extracurricular activities.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
