London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs University of Westminster vs Bangor University vs Kingston University - KU vs Buckinghamshire New University - Bucks New Uni
Side-by-side comparison from 601 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Expert, approachable faculty and high-quality teaching
- +Strong career preparation and marketable skills development
- +Excellent facilities and a supportive learning environment
- +Strong foundation in diverse business & marketing programmes
- +Approachable and supportive faculty
- +Vibrant, diverse campus with community engagement
- +Exceptional, passionate, and approachable lecturers/professors
- +Welcoming, supportive community and helpful staff
- +Beautiful location with abundant activities and resources
- +Knowledgeable and approachable lecturers, practical and relevant course content
- +Inclusive campus environment with many opportunities for personal and professional growth
- +Strong support systems and useful resources for students
- +Supportive and accessible staff
- +Engaging and challenging academic programs
- +Positive learning environment and community
Nothing to show
- +Innovative delivery model
- +Accessible, skilled lecturers
- -Poor teaching quality and unclear learning expectations.
- -Lack of structure and significant workload.
- -Disappointing careers service and limited social life.
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and delayed feedback.
- -Disengaging teaching quality with unmotivated lecturers and flawed course structures.
- -Inconsistent and disappointing delivery of lectures and practicals.
- -Discrimination and mishandling of complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues are prevalent.
- -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts studies.
- -Disorganized student union and indifferent faculty are recurring problems.
- -Poor communication and administrative issues are frequent frustrations.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and irrelevant curriculum content are disliked.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support are common complaints.
This institution demonstrates remarkable strengths in its **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving scores nearing 4.8. **Professors** also score highly at 4.26. Conversely, **Student Life** is the lowest-rated area, with a score of 3.64, followed by **Accomodation** at 3.79. Other aspects like Facilities and Value fall within a solid mid-range.
This university demonstrates a strong performance, particularly excelling in **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.3. **Student Life** and **Accommodations** represent areas with room for improvement, receiving the lowest ratings. Overall, the institution garners favorable marks for its facilities, professors, and value.
This institution garners commendable reviews, with its **Location** standing out as the highest-rated aspect. **Student Life**, **Professors**, and **Internationality** also received very positive scores. The **Accomodation** received the lowest rating, though it remains a solid score, indicating room for improvement in this specific area while other facets of the university experience are well-regarded.
Overall, the university garners positive feedback, with Internationality standing out as its strongest area. Facilities, Professors, Location, and Value also received favorable scores. Student Life and Accomodation are areas where improvements could be beneficial, as they received the lowest ratings in the survey.
Professors at this institution are exceptionally well-regarded, earning a high rating. Student life and internationality also received positive scores, reflecting well on these aspects. While generally favorable, accommodation stands out as the area with the lowest rating. Facilities and value for money are also rated competently.
Nothing to show
Perceived strengths of this institution lie in its excellent professors, ideal location, and strong international presence, all earning high marks. Student life is identified as a weaker area, receiving a notably lower rating. Other aspects, including facilities, accommodation, and overall value, fall within a positive range.
Nearly 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting a supportive environment, knowledgeable faculty, and excellent facilities. A small percentage (around 3.4%) mention issues like poor lecturing, inconsistent grading, and lack of social life.
With an average rating of 4.29/5 from 105 reviews, approximately 93% are positive, highlighting a diverse campus, approachable faculty, and engaging courses. Two reviews, about 1.9%, expressed concerns regarding some department teaching passion and feedback communication.
With an average rating of 4.51/5 from 71 reviews, ~99% are positive, praising excellent lecturers, beautiful location, and supportive staff. One review mentioned negative experiences regarding discrimination.
Kingston University receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~81% of 80 reviews being 4-5 stars and an average rating of 4.19/5. Key strengths include knowledgeable lecturers, practical course content, and a supportive environment, though a small percentage (~2.5%) noted poor management and lack of resources.
Approximately 100% of reviews are positive, with students highlighting friendly, supportive staff and engaging academic experiences. No negative feedback was recorded.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4/5 and 100% positive feedback, reviews highlight UHI's unique partnership model with colleges. Students appreciate the skilled lecturers and innovative video-conferencing approach connecting diverse locations across Scotland.
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
During my first year at the university of Westminster I was able to come to three conclusions. The first one is that the university is a great place to connect to people from all around the world, is it also a great place to find friends and teachers that help you find yourself. Second conclusion is that it is not always so fun and beautiful, it is a hard path, where you learn how to be responsible, and that every action that you take for your future has a consequence. It is also a great place to learn from your mistakes and become a better person, you get in contact with different people that teach you many things. Third conclusion is that it is a very cozy place, I love my university because it has a nice and cozy vibe, it is a modern building but inside is very nice. I love how the institution tries to make its students feel comfortable inside.
What I liked was the building itself, it is rather stunning, however... Whilst attending an annual PhD review, derogatory remarks were made against my speech, which is often slurred and incoherent when stressed due to being autistic. Bangor University not only ignored and undermined my complaint, but went further to add additional abuse. Discrimination policies and the Equality Act 2010 mean nothing to Bangor University. I would advise avoiding.
The course and it's syllabus can be super interesting and fun but most of the lecturers are trash. They show no enthusiasm to teach and deliver lectures as if they were eulogies. Which is a shame, I feel the only thing holding back KU is the lack of enthusiasm.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
