Universidad Nacional Abierta - UNA vs Universidad Nacional Experimental Politécnica Antonio José de Sucre - UNEXPO vs Instituto Universitario de Nuevas Profesiones - IUNP vs Universidad Nacional Experimental Simón Rodríguez - UNESR vs Universidad Nueva Esparta - UNE

Side-by-side comparison from 26 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad Nacional Experimental Politécnica Antonio José de Sucre - UNEXPO (5.00)
Universidad Nacional Abierta - UNA: wins 1/6 categories
Universidad Nacional Experimental Politécnica Antonio José de Sucre - UNEXPO: wins 2/6 categories
Instituto Universitario de Nuevas Profesiones - IUNP: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad Nacional Experimental Simón Rodríguez - UNESR: wins 1/6 categories
Universidad Nueva Esparta - UNE: wins 2/6 categories
Instituto Universitario de Tecnología de Administración Industrial - IUTA: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad Nacional Experimental de las Telecomunicaciones e Informática - UNETI: wins 0/6 categories
Category ratings
Facilities
3.98
3.00
Not rated
3.75
4.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.00
3.67
Not rated
3.43
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
3.23
4.33
Win
Not rated
4.13
2.00
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
3.50
3.33
Not rated
3.88
Win
1.00
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.00
3.67
Not rated
4.00
1.00
Not rated
Not rated
Value
3.73
4.67
Win
Not rated
3.63
1.00
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.50
Win
3.00
Not rated
2.57
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Flexible and distance learning
  • +Accessible and inclusive admission
  • +Strong academic support and quality education
  • +High academic standards and rigorous curriculum
  • +Supportive and experienced faculty for professional development
  • +Specialized engineering programs with excellent facilities

Nothing to show

  • +Dynamic and accessible educational environment with committed professors.
  • +Diverse and flexible academic programs.
  • +Encouragement of creativity, research, and social commitment.
  • +Relevant, advanced career programs
  • +Professional development and expertise
  • +Conducive study environment
  • +Excellent teaching and professor support
  • +Valuable career training and practical learning
  • +Well-equipped facilities and accessible programs

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and outdated curriculum are a problem.
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequent complaints.
  • -Overcrowded classes and insufficient resources frustrate students.

Nothing to show

  • -Poor academic organization and lack of essential resources like laboratories.
  • -Frequent absence of teaching staff due to low salaries and poor compensation.
  • -University unpreparedness for complex degree programs.
  • -Insufficient qualified teaching staff leads to underqualified instructors.
  • -Curriculum reduction omits essential subjects.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern amenities are a frequent complaint.
  • -Poor communication and inefficient administrative processes cause frustration.
  • -Limited career support and a disconnect between curriculum and job market needs are concerning.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in **Location** and **Student Life**, both earning perfect scores. **Facilities** also rank highly, indicating a well-equipped campus. Conversely, **Professors** received the lowest rating, suggesting an area for potential improvement. Other aspects like **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Value** fall within a moderate range.

This institution presents a notable profile, with its strongest area being **Value** at 4.67. Areas such as **Facilities** and **Accommodation** represent its weakest points, both scoring a 3. Other aspects like Professors, Location, Student Life, and Internationality fall within a moderate to good range.

Nothing to show

Overall, this university garners positive feedback across most aspects. Professors and student life stand out as particular strengths. However, accommodation received the lowest marks, indicating a significant area for improvement. The university also scored moderately well in facilities, location, internationality, and value, suggesting a generally satisfactory, though not exceptional, experience in these regards.

This institution shines in its **location**, receiving a perfect score, and demonstrates solid performance in **facilities**. However, significant weaknesses are apparent in **student life**, **internationality**, and **value**, all earning a low rating of 1. **Professors** and **accommodation** fall in the middle range, suggesting areas for development alongside the lower-scoring aspects.

This institution presents a uniformly unrated profile across all surveyed aspects. No specific strengths or weaknesses can be identified, as all categories, including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, have received zero ratings. Consequently, a comprehensive assessment of its performance is not possible based on this data.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%), with an average rating of 4.2/5. Students praise flexibility, time management, and the ability to study and work concurrently, citing the distance learning model and accessible educational materials.

All 3 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students praise the academic excellence, skilled teachers, and specialized engineering programs. There is no negative feedback.

Nothing to show

90% of reviewers praise the dynamic environment, quality professors, and diverse programs. One reviewer noted concerns about professor feedback and missing faculty, representing 10% of feedback.

The university receives generally positive feedback, with ~75% of reviews being highly favorable. Some minor concerns were noted about limited transportation access and teaching staff qualifications.

With an average rating of 4.5/5, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~75%). Students highlight excellent education and supportive professors. No negative feedback was reported.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
20%
100%
0%
60%
50%
75%
0%
4★
80%
0%
0%
30%
25%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
25%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
25%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
10%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Vet

The Simón Rodríguez University had many shortcomings in terms of the study and organization to teach the degree in veterinary medicine, there were not even laboratories and the teaching staff was very infrequent due to the very low salary that the teachers received for their work, the university did not I was prepared to take on a career of that magnitude.

Not the best moment for this university

At this moment, this is not the best university to study on Venezuela, it doesn't have enough teachers for all the subjects, because of that, there are students teaching, they are not even graduated. Also they reduced the career from 5 to 4 years, that wasn't good because now we don't see some important subjects that help on the field of engineering. I don't recommend it at this moment.

My House of Studies

It's a good university, but in general this semester fell as there are always problems with pirate teachers ... Your system of notes via the internet is pathetic this semester ... Its price compared to other universities is really economic, that's what another good one that he has. And it should be noted that yes, there are still good teachers in the IUTA but unfortunately they will take other courses since their pay is very low.

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close