Munich Intellectual Property Law Center vs University of Tuzla - UNTZ vs European University Kallos Tuzla - EU Kallos Tuzla vs International Business Information Academy - IPIA vs Instituto Universitario De Diseño Las Mercedes - IUDLM
Side-by-side comparison from 117 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
Nothing to show
- +High-quality, professional, and helpful professors
- +Good educational programs fulfilling expectations
- +Supportive environment and career prospects
- +Friendly and accessible professors
- +Good learning opportunities
- +Modern facilities and location
- +Quality education with supportive staff and professors
- +Modern and well-equipped facilities and classrooms
- +Engaging and challenging academic programs
- +Creative and collaborative learning environment
- +Focus on ecological and sustainable design
Nothing to show
- +Passionate, qualified professors and supportive environment.
- +Abundant extracurricular activities and student groups.
- +Strong academic programs with practical focus.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and organizational issues are pervasive.
- -Lack of practical application and outdated facilities are significant problems.
- -Some professors exhibit poor teaching methods and rudeness.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited as a major source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff leave students feeling neglected.
- -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources hinder learning.
- -The curriculum feels irrelevant, lacking practical application and depth.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently mentioned.
- -Lack of engaging teaching or relevant curriculum is a common complaint.
Nothing to show
- -Outdated facilities and equipment, especially in labs.
- -Lack of professor guidance and student support for tasks.
- -Poor career prospects and limited opportunities after graduation.
Nothing to show
Regarding university performance, professors and location stand out as the strongest aspects, both receiving ratings around 4.0. Student life and value are also well-regarded, scoring above 3.5. Areas for potential improvement include facilities, accommodation, and internationality, which are rated in the low 3s. Overall, the university demonstrates a solid but varied performance across these key metrics.
This academic institution received consistently low ratings across all surveyed categories. Areas like facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all scored zero. Consequently, there are no standout strengths or weaknesses to highlight, as the university appears to perform poorly across the board according to this assessment.
This institution demonstrates outstanding performance, achieving a perfect score in Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value. Its strongest areas are clearly these aspects, reflecting a highly positive student experience and excellent offerings. The Facilities rating, while still very good at 4, represents the only slight area for potential improvement within an otherwise exceptional overall assessment.
The university receives outstanding scores in several key areas, achieving a perfect 5 out of 5 for Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, and Value. Its weakest area, Internationality, scored a 3 out of 5, indicating room for improvement in global engagement and diversity. Overall, the institution offers a highly rated experience across most aspects of university life.
Nothing to show
This university demonstrates a well-rounded performance according to recent ratings. Its **strongest area is Location**, achieving a score of 4.36, while **Accomodation received the lowest rating** at 3.55. Other categories like Facilities, Professors, Student Life, Internationality, and Value all fall within a respectable 3.8 to 4.1 range, indicating a generally positive experience across multiple aspects of university life.
Nothing to show
Around 46% of reviews are positive, praising high-quality staff and curriculum, with some noting occasional subjective grading. About 17% are negative, citing poor organization and lack of practical application. The average rating is 3.49/5.
With an average rating of 4.33/5 based on 3 reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students praise the modern design, great location, and the kindness and professionalism of professors and staff. Some suggest improvements for certain faculties regarding curriculum and practical experience.
The sole review is highly positive, awarding 5 out of 5 stars. Students praise the quality education, supportive professors, and modern, well-equipped facilities. No negative feedback was recorded.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students highlight enriching experiences, engaging professors, and a fostering of creativity and collaboration, particularly within the Interior Design program with its ecological design emphasis.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 3.91/5, ~73% of reviews are positive, praising qualified professors and numerous student activities. Some negative feedback (~18%) mentions outdated equipment and a lack of guidance.
Nothing to show
The price for the master's is insanely expensive considering what it has to offer. I got an MA in translation and interpreting, but sadly, my colleagues and I barely had any practical exercises in these subjects. Most of the professors were alright though. Bearing in mind where they work, most of them try to do their best. The university is politicized, since the politicians play with it like with ping-pong balls. The only aim is to employ their own people, no matter how incompetent they are, instead of the people who are actually able to do proper work. Anyone in their right mind (since I was not one of those people) will opt to study abroad and obtain the MA degree somewhere else. I paid 2500 KM so I can have a degree from an XY rated university, instead of studying in, say, Germany or Austria, where the prices are identical, or even lower, and where students can also get real scholarships if they're good enough. Once again, a waste of money. If only they (politicians) invested all that money in infrastructure and better equipment, the university would be a much nicer place and the main Uni building would not have 40 YO doors and windows.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
What I like about my university and faculty is that I have a lot of possibilities to work on my development. I will meet here a lot of people from different countries and develop my social and soft skills, which are very important, for example in our future job. I cannot say a lot about my faculty yet, because I am here only for a few weeks, but I have very high hopes that it will be a well-spent time!