New York College European and American Education - NYC vs Epoka University - EPOKA vs Polytechnic University of Tirana - UPT vs Metropolitan University of Tirana - UMT vs University of New York Tirana - UNYT

Side-by-side comparison from 19 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Mediterranean University of Albania - MUA (5.00)
New York College European and American Education - NYC: wins 0/3 categories
Epoka University - EPOKA: wins 0/3 categories
Polytechnic University of Tirana - UPT: wins 0/3 categories
Metropolitan University of Tirana - UMT: wins 0/3 categories
University of New York Tirana - UNYT: wins 1/3 categories
University Marin Barleti - UMB: wins 0/3 categories
Mediterranean University of Albania - MUA: wins 2/3 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Mathematics
Best programme: Business Informatics
Best programme: Informatics
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Best programme: Animation
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
4.00
3.00
3.67
3.67
5.00
5.00
Location
Not rated
2.00
4.20
3.67
4.33
4.00
4.50
Win
Professors
Not rated
3.00
3.14
3.67
4.67
5.00
5.00
Internationality
Not rated
3.00
2.57
3.33
4.67
Win
4.50
4.50
Student life
Not rated
2.00
2.50
3.67
4.00
4.00
4.00
Value
Not rated
3.00
3.29
3.67
4.67
4.50
5.00
Win
Accommodation
Not rated
3.00
2.17
3.33
4.00
4.50
4.50
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality, multicultural education
  • +Excellent, experienced professors
  • +Strong business programs

Nothing to show

  • +Excellent academic staff and quality of education
  • +Practical, well-equipped labs and strong technical programs
  • +Opportunities for personal growth and a rewarding experience
  • +Expert faculty with international experience
  • +Modern facilities and infrastructure
  • +Valuable learning experiences and professional development
  • +Quality programs and knowledgeable, supportive professors
  • +Engaging faculty and staff
  • +Good learning environment and opportunities
  • +Qualified and experienced pedagogical staff
  • +Positive and welcoming university environment
  • +Employment and training opportunities
  • +Hands-on training for job market competitiveness.
  • +Inspiring and flexible teaching.
Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern amenities frustrate students.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and poor communication cause significant problems.
  • -Overcrowded classrooms and a lack of individual attention detract from the learning experience.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues, with a lack of consideration for student opinions and an unsupportive staff attitude.
  • -Outdated teaching methods and disorganized class structures.
  • -Insufficient facilities and equipment, particularly lacking for practical subjects.
  • -Lack of genuine teacher engagement and student support.
  • -Perceived focus on financial gain over educational quality.
  • -Waste of money due to poor value.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology impede learning.
  • -High costs are perceived as poor value for the educational experience.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Course content is often irrelevant and poorly delivered.
  • -Administrative and management issues create constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder effective learning.
  • -Unresponsive communication from staff is a significant problem.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution presents a uniform, middling performance across all evaluated aspects. With zero ratings in categories spanning facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, there are no standout strengths or discernible weaknesses. The university's profile is entirely consistent, indicating an average experience in every surveyed area.

Nothing to show

This institution presents a mixed review based on student feedback. Its strongest areas include Location, which received a high rating, and Value, indicating good return on investment. Conversely, Accomodation appears to be a significant weakness, scoring the lowest. Student Life and Internationality also received comparatively lower marks, while Facilities and Professors fall in the mid-range.

This institution garners consistently solid ratings across several key aspects, with facilities, professors, location, student life, and value all receiving a strong 3.67. The areas showing slightly lower, though still respectable, scores are accommodation and internationality, both averaging 3.33. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded experience with particular strengths in its core academic and extracurricular offerings.

This university is highly regarded, particularly excelling in its professors, internationality, and value, all receiving scores of 4.67. Student life, accommodation, and location also score well, with 4.33 to 4.0 ratings. The facilities represent the lowest-rated aspect at 3.67.

This institution receives exceptionally high marks for its **facilities and professors**, both scoring a perfect five. The university also excels in **student life, internationality, and overall value**, each earning a strong 4.5. Its weakest area, while still positive, is its **location**, rated at 4. Accommodation also scores well at 4.5.

This institution garners exceptionally high marks, notably achieving perfect scores for its facilities and professors. Student life, while positive, is the lowest-rated area at 4 out of 5. The university also scores well in location, accommodation, internationality, and value, all receiving 4.5 ratings. Overall, it presents a very strong offering to its students.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a single review, the feedback is overwhelmingly positive. The reviewer highlights the high quality of multicultural education and academic collaborations. Professors are described as excellent with practical experience.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3.43/5, roughly 74% of students offer positive feedback, highlighting strong academic foundations, knowledgeable staff, and practical programs. However, approximately 28.6% of reviews note issues with administration, outdated facilities, and unsupportive staff.

With an average rating of 3.67, reviews are mostly positive (~67%), highlighting quality private education, expert professors, and good infrastructure. A minority (~33%) express concerns about teaching quality and teacher engagement.

All three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4/5. Students highlight good programs, knowledgeable faculty, and a supportive learning environment. No negative feedback was received.

The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students praise the specialized and experienced pedagogical staff, the comfortable environment, and opportunities for employment and training. Negative feedback is minimal.

With an average rating of 5/5, these two reviews are entirely positive. Students highlight hands-on training and inspiring, hardworking teachers, making them competitive in the job market.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
0%
29%
67%
0%
50%
100%
4★
100%
0%
14%
0%
100%
50%
0%
3★
0%
100%
29%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
29%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
33%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Supportive professors and practical learning

he Polytechnic University of Tirana provides a solid foundation in technical and engineering fields. The professors are knowledgeable and supportive, and the study programs are practical. However, the administration can sometimes be slow, and more modern facilities would improve the student experience. Overall, I would recommend this university to students who want a strong academic background.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close