Universidad Complutense de Madrid - UCM vs University Goce Delcev vs Business Academy Smilevski - BAS vs Symbiosis International University vs Universiti Teknologi Malaysia - UTM
Side-by-side comparison from 194 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Exceptional professors and engaging curriculum
- +High academic standards and professional development
- +Supportive learning environment and broad program variety
- +Supportive and dedicated professors
- +Relevant and modern academic programs
- +Friendly and international community
- +Highly ranked professors and unique, practical teaching methods.
- +Opportunities for career development and bridging theory with the real business world.
- +Affordable education through scholarships and accessibility for international students.
- +Supportive faculty and focus on personal development
- +Opportunities for exploration through diverse subjects and extracurriculars
- +Well-managed balance between academics and activities
- +Exceptional professors and staff with strong industry connections
- +Modern and well-maintained campus facilities and learning spaces
- +Supportive academic environment with an emphasis on research
- +Supportive teachers and staff
- +Helpful administrative offices
- +Empathetic and caring environment
Nothing to show
- -Outdated facilities and a need for rehaul.
- -Ineffective teaching methods and lack of practical application.
- -Poor administrative and management issues impacting student evaluation and career readiness.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology impede learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support creates uncertainty.
- -Administrative & management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts students.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent concerns.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
- -Students dislike the strict and financially burdensome penalty system.
- -Unhelpful and rude staff members are a recurring complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology are a major drawback.
- -The quality and structure of some courses are disappointing.
Nothing to show
This institution garners strong commendations, particularly for its vibrant student life and desirable location, both scoring above 4.3. Value for money and internationality are also well-regarded. However, facilities and accommodation present areas for improvement, receiving the lowest ratings in the survey. Professor quality and overall value represent a solid middle ground.
This university presents a mixed review, with its strongest areas being **Professors** and **Internationality**, both scoring a solid 3.67. **Facilities** and **Accomodation** received moderate ratings of 3. Conversely, **Location** and **Student Life** are identified as the weakest points, each averaging 2.67. The **Value** proposition sits in the middle at 3.33.
Overall, this institution garners exceptionally high marks. Its facilities, professors, location, and student life all achieve a perfect score of 5. The university also excels in value, rated at 5. Its accommodations and internationality are also strong, both scoring a commendable 4.67, representing the areas with slightly less than perfect scores.
Students have provided a comprehensive evaluation of the university, with **Student Life** emerging as the strongest area, receiving a score of 4.625. **Accomodation** and **Value** are rated equally at 4.125, representing the areas with the lowest scores. Other categories such as Facilities, Professors, Location, and Internationality all fall within a strong range between 4.0625 and 4.375, indicating a generally positive student experience.
The university presents a solid overall profile, excelling in its **location** and **value** with high ratings. **Facilities** and **professors** also received strong scores. The weakest area, though still positive, is **student life**, indicating room for potential enhancement in that aspect. Other categories like accommodation and internationality are well-regarded.
This institution presents a well-rounded profile, excelling in several key aspects. Its strongest areas include Professors, Location, Student Life, Internationality, and Value, all receiving a rating of 4. Conversely, Facilities and Accommodations are identified as the comparatively weaker points, each rated at 3. Overall, the university demonstrates significant strengths in most evaluated categories.
Nothing to show
Approximately 96.3% of reviews are positive, highlighting learned skills and professional development from knowledgeable professors. A small portion of feedback (around 3.7%) mentions outdated facilities and occasional teaching style concerns.
With an average rating of 4/5, the university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback from students. Recurring themes highlight supportive and informative professors, a positive learning environment, and valuable international experiences.
All three reviews are positive (100%), giving an average rating of 5/5. Students highlight practical education, dedicated professors, and career opportunities.
With a 4.25/5 average rating from 16 reviews, ~94% are positive, highlighting good faculty and well-managed programs. Negative feedback is minimal, representing approximately 0% of feedback.
Approximately 87.5% of reviews are positive, praising exceptional professors, strong industry connections, and a supportive academic environment. One review expressed dissatisfaction with faculty management and late registration penalties.
With one review, the average rating is 4/5 stars. The feedback highlights supportive teachers and helpful office staff, indicating a positive experience. There is no negative feedback.
Nothing to show
The Universidad Complutense de Madrid is an old and big University. This comes with good and bad things. The best is that it has very very very good teachers and a good quality of studies with a huge variety of choices. But, at the same time the teachers, even though they are very good, they've been teaching for a very long time. Sometimes more than they should and they should have retired a long time ago. Also the bureaucracy is slow and exasperating. The university doesn't even respect their own deadlines and they tend to be a little botchy. In summary, a good university that needs to be renovated.
The university is just fine. Always puts my interests first. The professors are also very nice and informative. The Erasmus + program works very well, a lot of students have already went on the Erasmus + exchange program.
This academy teaches me a lot. Here the professors are highly ranked and the students have the opportunity to walk through this journey with their role models. The type of teaching is unique in this country. Professors are dedicated to their students and have availability to pay attention to each one. Main focus are the practices, and the practical education is most present. I'm currently on my master degrees here, and I definitely recommend this university!
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
