Universidad de Palermo - UP vs Universidad del Salvador - USAL vs Universidad Favaloro vs Escuela Normal Superior en Lenguas Vivas "Sofía Spangenberg" - ENSLV vs National University of Mar del Plata

Side-by-side comparison from 20 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Escuela Normal Superior en Lenguas Vivas "Sofía Spangenberg" - ENSLV (5.00)
Universidad de Palermo - UP: wins 2/7 categories
Universidad del Salvador - USAL: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Favaloro: wins 0/7 categories
Escuela Normal Superior en Lenguas Vivas "Sofía Spangenberg" - ENSLV: wins 5/7 categories
National University of Mar del Plata: wins 0/7 categories
Torcuato Di Tella University - UTDT: wins 0/7 categories
National University of San Antonio de Areco - UNSAdA: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Buenos Aires, Argentina
4.30
Read more reviews
13 reviews
×
Best programme: Advertising and Marketing
Best programme: Psychology
Buenos Aires, Argentina
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Translation and Intercultural Communication
Best programme: Accounting Technician
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.40
Win
3.33
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Location
3.80
3.67
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.33
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.20
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
3.80
3.33
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.67
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.60
Win
4.00
Not rated
4.00
4.33
Not rated
Not rated
Value
3.80
4.67
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.33
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.80
2.33
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.33
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Flexible study options and personalized learning paths
  • +High-quality professors with real-world experience
  • +Practical, project-based learning and career support
  • +Highly qualified and supportive teachers
  • +Comprehensive and broad program curriculum
  • +Positive and well-structured learning environment

Nothing to show

  • +Emphasis on teacher training and translation degrees
  • +Esteemed faculty and industry experts
  • +Comprehensive curriculum blending theory and practice
  • +Comprehensive curriculum with strong theoretical and practical foundation
  • +Supportive faculty and valuable real-world experience through practicums/assistantships
  • +Dynamic and diverse learning environment with helpful, analytical teachers

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative & management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning experiences.
  • -Lack of engagement from instructors and insufficient course relevance are common complaints.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities are a persistent problem.
  • -Ineffective administrative and management support creates significant frustration.
  • -Lack of clear communication and transparency from the institution is a major concern.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a significant problem.
  • -Lack of practical experience and unclear course structure is disappointing.
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support frustrates students.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in student life, scoring a high 4.6, and facilities, rated at 4.4. Conversely, location, accommodation, internationality, and value all received a moderate 3.8, indicating areas for potential improvement. The academic side is well-regarded, with professors achieving a solid 4.2. Overall, the university offers a good experience, particularly in its campus resources and social environment.

This institution presents a well-rounded profile, excelling particularly in **Value**, which received the highest rating. **Professors** and **Student Life** also scored strongly, indicating positive experiences in these areas. Conversely, **Accomodation** received the lowest rating, suggesting it may be an area for improvement. **Facilities** and **Internationality** fall in the mid-range, while **Location** is rated moderately well.

Nothing to show

This university demonstrates exceptional strengths, with perfect scores in professors, location, accommodation, internationality, and value. Facilities and student life also receive high marks, scoring a strong 4 out of 5. The only area not explicitly rated is its weakest, though the provided data indicates outstanding performance across all surveyed aspects.

This institution garners strong reviews, particularly excelling in student life, accommodation, location, and value, all receiving a high 4.33. Facilities and professors also score well with a solid 4. A notable area for improvement is internationality, which received the lowest rating of 3.67, suggesting a potential focus for development.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

University feedback is overwhelmingly positive, with ~77% of reviews rating it 4–5 stars and an average of 4.31/5. Students praise flexible study plans, project-based learning, and excellent professors. No negative feedback was reported.

Students praise remarkable teachers, well-organized information, and a broad, holistic program. Positive feedback (~100%) highlights a supportive learning environment and a balanced approach, with minor drawbacks noted on course availability and virtual options.

Nothing to show

The single review for Ens en Lenguas Vivas Sofia E. Broquen de Spangenberg is highly positive, giving it a 5/5 rating. This 100% positive sentiment highlights the university's excellence in language education, particularly its teacher training and translation programs.

All 3 reviews were positive, resulting in an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlighted comprehensive curriculum, supportive faculty, and valuable real-world experience, with only minor mentions of areas for practice improvement.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
54%
67%
0%
100%
67%
0%
0%
4★
23%
33%
0%
0%
33%
0%
0%
3★
23%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close