Universidad Nacional de Colombia vs Universidad Militar Nueva Granada - UMNG vs Politecnico Grancolombiano - PGC vs Escuela Colombiana de Carreras Industriales - ECCI vs Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas - UDISTRITAL

Side-by-side comparison from 49 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas - UDISTRITAL (5.00)
Universidad Nacional de Colombia: wins 1/4 categories
Universidad Militar Nueva Granada - UMNG: wins 0/4 categories
Politecnico Grancolombiano - PGC: wins 0/4 categories
Escuela Colombiana de Carreras Industriales - ECCI: wins 0/4 categories
Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas - UDISTRITAL: wins 3/4 categories
Fundación Universitaria Los Libertadores - ULIBERTADORES: wins 0/4 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: Computer Engineering
Best programme: Business Management and Modern Languages and Cultures
Best programme: Mathematics
Category ratings
Facilities
4.07
4.00
4.60
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.92
4.50
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.86
4.00
4.67
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
4.21
5.00
4.67
5.00
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.84
Win
4.00
4.20
4.00
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.79
4.00
4.17
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.79
4.00
4.00
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High academic quality and knowledgeable professors.
  • +Personal and professional growth opportunities.
  • +Positive and supportive campus environment.
  • +Excellent faculty and academic level
  • +Relevant and practical learning experiences
  • +Attractive and accessible campus locations
  • +High academic quality and standards
  • +Flexible study options and time management
  • +Committed and qualified professors
  • +Flexible curriculum and teacher willingness
  • +Unorganized internal logistics and outdated facilities
  • +Diverse faculties and engaging university activities
  • +Strong analytical and technical skills, especially in mathematics and data
  • +Passion for learning and pursuing advanced studies
  • +Professional development & industry relevance
  • +Life projects & research opportunities

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -Inconsistent course quality and teaching standards are a common complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of effective teaching and student support is a common complaint.
  • -Excessive administrative burdens and ineffective management.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources.
  • -Poor communication and unsupportive faculty.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and a perceived lack of student support are common complaints.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from staff.
  • -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources.
  • -Disorganized and inefficient administrative processes.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Facilities and equipment are consistently outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Instructors' teaching quality and availability are often insufficient.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners exceptionally high marks, particularly for its Location and Student Life, both approaching a perfect score. Professors also receive near-perfect ratings. While Internationality and Value are strong, Facilities are rated moderately well. The weakest area, however, is Accomodation, indicating a need for improvement in this category.

This institution receives excellent feedback, with its **Internationality rating standing out at a perfect 5**. Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Accomodation all scored a solid 4, indicating strong overall offerings. Location is also a notable strength at 4.5. The Value rating is also good at 4. While no areas are weak, the strongest performing category is clearly Internationality.

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its **Facilities** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.66. **Professors** also receive high marks. Conversely, **Location** and **Accomodation** are the areas with the lowest scores, at 4. These ratings suggest a well-regarded university with some room for improvement in specific logistical aspects.

This institution boasts exceptional strengths in its faculty, international student community, and perceived value, all earning a perfect score. Student life, facilities, and accommodation also received high marks, indicating a well-rounded experience. The university's weakest area, however, is its location, which unfortunately scored zero.

This institution earns excellent scores in several key areas. Facilities, professors, location, and accommodation all received perfect marks, indicating a strong foundation. Student life and internationality are areas for potential growth, with both scoring a respectable but lower 3 out of 5. Overall, the university presents a highly positive picture, particularly in its core offerings and infrastructure.

Across all surveyed categories, this institution received uniform ratings. This indicates no particular strengths or weaknesses were identified in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, or value. The consistent scoring suggests an even distribution of perceived quality across these key aspects of the university experience.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.75/5 average, ~100% of 32 reviews are positive. Students praise excellent academic quality, highly qualified professors, and a supportive, professional environment. No negative feedback was recorded.

All five reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.4/5 stars. Students highlight excellent professors, a strong academic level, and appealing campuses. One review mentioned administrative improvements are needed.

All 7 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.86/5. Students praise the university's high academic quality, committed professors, flexible study options, and practical learning model.

With an average rating of 3.5/5, feedback is ~50% positive. Students appreciate the flexibility in course selection due to teacher willingness. However, ~50% of feedback notes unorganized internal logistics and outdated, unrestored facilities.

With an average rating of 5/5, university student reviews are overwhelmingly positive. Feedback highlights strong mathematical interests and analytical skills, alongside participation in research and academic events. The university offers diverse faculties and engaging activities.

With a 4/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, students praise the university's professional development and real-world opportunities. One reviewer suggested incorporating more training on modern technologies like Azure and Big Data.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
81%
40%
86%
0%
100%
0%
0%
4★
13%
60%
14%
50%
0%
100%
0%
3★
6%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close