Universidad Nacional de Colombia vs Universidad Militar Nueva Granada - UMNG vs Universidad Manuela Beltrán - UMB vs Universidad Autónoma de Colombia - FUAC vs Escuela Colombiana de Carreras Industriales - ECCI

Side-by-side comparison from 44 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad Nacional de Colombia (4.70)
Universidad Nacional de Colombia: wins 3/5 categories
Universidad Militar Nueva Granada - UMNG: wins 0/5 categories
Universidad Manuela Beltrán - UMB: wins 0/5 categories
Universidad Autónoma de Colombia - FUAC: wins 0/5 categories
Escuela Colombiana de Carreras Industriales - ECCI: wins 2/5 categories
Fundación Universitaria Los Libertadores - ULIBERTADORES: wins 0/5 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: Fashion Engineering
Best programme: Business Management and Modern Languages and Cultures
Category ratings
Facilities
4.07
Win
4.00
3.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.92
Win
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.86
4.00
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
4.21
5.00
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.84
Win
4.00
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.79
4.00
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.79
4.00
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High academic quality and knowledgeable professors.
  • +Personal and professional growth opportunities.
  • +Positive and supportive campus environment.
  • +Excellent faculty and academic level
  • +Relevant and practical learning experiences
  • +Attractive and accessible campus locations
  • +High-quality, accredited programs with well-equipped facilities and practical application of knowledge.
  • +Emphasis on creativity, research, and instilling strong values for responsible and ethical professionals.
  • +Opportunities for diverse practical experiences and national/international student exchange programs.

Nothing to show

  • +Flexible curriculum and teacher willingness
  • +Unorganized internal logistics and outdated facilities
  • +Professional development & industry relevance
  • +Life projects & research opportunities

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -Inconsistent course quality and teaching standards are a common complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of effective teaching and student support is a common complaint.
  • -Inconsistent and unclear communication from administration.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of career services and job placement support.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and a perceived lack of student support are common complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Facilities and equipment are consistently outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Instructors' teaching quality and availability are often insufficient.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners exceptionally high marks, particularly for its Location and Student Life, both approaching a perfect score. Professors also receive near-perfect ratings. While Internationality and Value are strong, Facilities are rated moderately well. The weakest area, however, is Accomodation, indicating a need for improvement in this category.

This institution receives excellent feedback, with its **Internationality rating standing out at a perfect 5**. Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Accomodation all scored a solid 4, indicating strong overall offerings. Location is also a notable strength at 4.5. The Value rating is also good at 4. While no areas are weak, the strongest performing category is clearly Internationality.

This institution boasts impressive strengths in several key areas. Student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value all received excellent ratings of 4. Professors also garnered positive feedback with a score of 4. However, facilities represent a weaker point, scoring a 3, while the location received no rating.

Nothing to show

This institution boasts exceptional strengths in its faculty, international student community, and perceived value, all earning a perfect score. Student life, facilities, and accommodation also received high marks, indicating a well-rounded experience. The university's weakest area, however, is its location, which unfortunately scored zero.

Across all surveyed categories, this institution received uniform ratings. This indicates no particular strengths or weaknesses were identified in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, or value. The consistent scoring suggests an even distribution of perceived quality across these key aspects of the university experience.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.75/5 average, ~100% of 32 reviews are positive. Students praise excellent academic quality, highly qualified professors, and a supportive, professional environment. No negative feedback was recorded.

All five reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.4/5 stars. Students highlight excellent professors, a strong academic level, and appealing campuses. One review mentioned administrative improvements are needed.

With an average rating of 4.25/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight the high quality physiotherapy program, creative curriculum, and emphasis on developing responsible, dedicated professionals. Facilities and learning tools are also noted as beneficial.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3.5/5, feedback is ~50% positive. Students appreciate the flexibility in course selection due to teacher willingness. However, ~50% of feedback notes unorganized internal logistics and outdated, unrestored facilities.

With a 4/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, students praise the university's professional development and real-world opportunities. One reviewer suggested incorporating more training on modern technologies like Azure and Big Data.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
81%
40%
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
13%
60%
75%
0%
50%
100%
0%
3★
6%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close