Universidad Nacional de Colombia vs Pontificia Universidad Javeriana - PUJ vs Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana - UPB vs Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano - UTADEO vs Universidad Autónoma de Colombia - FUAC

Side-by-side comparison from 82 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano - UTADEO (4.90)
Universidad Nacional de Colombia: wins 4/7 categories
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana - PUJ: wins 2/7 categories
Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana - UPB: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano - UTADEO: wins 1/7 categories
Universidad Autónoma de Colombia - FUAC: wins 0/7 categories
Escuela de Artes y Letras - EAL: wins 0/7 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Civil Engineering
Best programme: Advertising
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: Graphic Engineering and Design
Category ratings
Facilities
4.07
4.74
Win
4.00
4.43
Not rated
2.33
Not rated
Location
4.92
Win
4.56
4.60
4.57
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Professors
4.86
Win
4.68
4.20
4.57
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
Internationality
4.21
4.42
Win
4.00
4.29
Not rated
2.33
Not rated
Student life
4.84
Win
4.63
3.80
4.71
Not rated
2.67
Not rated
Value
4.79
Win
4.47
4.40
4.43
Not rated
2.67
Not rated
Accommodation
3.79
4.37
2.20
4.71
Win
Not rated
2.33
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High academic quality and knowledgeable professors.
  • +Personal and professional growth opportunities.
  • +Positive and supportive campus environment.
  • +strong academic programs and well-qualified teachers
  • +holistic development through extracurriculars and soft skills
  • +supportive campus atmosphere and international community
  • +Elite academic programs and strong teachers
  • +Excellent infrastructure and facilities
  • +Humanistic focus and values
  • +High-quality, experienced faculty
  • +Strong, well-structured programs with practical application
  • +Excellent academic training and professional growth opportunities

Nothing to show

  • +quality faculty and student programs
  • +good location

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -Inconsistent course quality and teaching standards are a common complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a problem.
  • -Poor communication and unsupportive staff are significant drawbacks.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a significant concern.
  • -Lack of resources and support impacts the learning experience.
  • -Disorganized and unhelpful administration.
  • -Outdated or insufficient facilities and resources.
  • -Lack of engaging or relevant curriculum.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Lack of effective communication and student support is a problem.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners exceptionally high marks, particularly for its Location and Student Life, both approaching a perfect score. Professors also receive near-perfect ratings. While Internationality and Value are strong, Facilities are rated moderately well. The weakest area, however, is Accomodation, indicating a need for improvement in this category.

Overall, this university garners strong ratings across multiple aspects. Facilities stand out as a significant strength, alongside excellent scores for professors and student life. While accommodations received the lowest rating, areas such as location, internationality, and value also present a positive picture, indicating a well-rounded experience.

An overall assessment of the university reveals a strong performance in several key areas. The location stands out as a particular strength with a rating of 4.6, closely followed by professors at 4.2 and value at 4.4. Facilities and internationality also received a solid 4. Student life is rated moderately at 3.8. The weakest area identified is accommodation, receiving a considerably lower score of 2.2.

Overall, this institution garners positive evaluations across numerous aspects. Student life and accommodation stand out as the strongest areas, achieving the highest scores. Conversely, internationality is rated slightly lower than other categories, representing the weakest performing metric. Facilities and value received comparable, solid ratings, while professor and location scores were also very strong.

Nothing to show

Academically, the university excels, with professors receiving an exceptionally high rating of 4.33. However, areas requiring significant improvement include facilities and accommodation, both rated at a low 2.33. Student life and value for money are also mid-range, while location sits at a neutral 3. The university's internationality also scored similarly low at 2.33.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.75/5 average, ~100% of 32 reviews are positive. Students praise excellent academic quality, highly qualified professors, and a supportive, professional environment. No negative feedback was recorded.

With 27 reviews, ~93% are positive, highlighting strong extracurriculars, helpful teachers, and a pleasant atmosphere. Few negative comments exist, representing ~0% of feedback.

With 12 out of 13 reviews being positive, students highly praise the university's strong tradition, excellent teachers, and quality facilities. Key themes include a humanist approach, elite orientation in economics, and good learning methodologies, with ~92% of feedback being highly positive.

All seven reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.86/5. Students praise high-quality faculty, excellent curriculum, state-of-the-art facilities, and strong professional training.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3.67/5, reviews indicate positive aspects like good teachers and program offerings. A minor point concerns the availability of study and sports spaces, and outdated computer equipment.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
81%
85%
54%
86%
0%
33%
0%
4★
13%
7%
38%
14%
0%
0%
0%
3★
6%
7%
8%
0%
0%
67%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close