University of Leicester vs The Hebrew University of Jerusalem vs University of West Florida vs Susquehanna University vs Norwich University of the Arts - NUA

Side-by-side comparison from 126 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Ramgarhia Institute of Engineering and Technology (5.00)
University of Leicester: wins 1/6 categories
The Hebrew University of Jerusalem: wins 2/6 categories
University of West Florida: wins 1/6 categories
Susquehanna University: wins 0/6 categories
Norwich University of the Arts - NUA: wins 0/6 categories
Universidade Federal do Oeste da Bahia: wins 0/6 categories
Ramgarhia Institute of Engineering and Technology: wins 2/6 categories
Comparing
Leicester, The United Kingdom
4.20
Read more reviews
82 reviews
×
Best programme: Medicine
Best programme: Political Science
Pensacola, Florida, United States
4.10
Read more reviews
40 reviews
×
Best programme: Nursing
Selinsgrove, Pennsylvania, United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Norwich, The United Kingdom
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Fine Arts
Best programme: Engineering Technologies
Category ratings
Facilities
4.29
4.50
Win
2.07
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
3.00
Location
4.34
4.50
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Professors
4.23
4.50
Win
4.28
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
3.00
Internationality
4.30
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
1.00
Student life
4.36
4.00
3.61
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Value
4.08
4.50
4.48
Not rated
2.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Accommodation
3.77
Win
3.50
2.93
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong academics and supportive faculty
  • +Welcoming and diverse student community
  • +Affordable and convenient location
  • +Outstanding academic quality and supportive professors
  • +Vibrant and intellectually stimulating campus atmosphere
  • +Blend of theoretical and practical learning
  • +Supportive advisors and staff
  • +Accessible and efficient enrollment
  • +Financial aid and scholarships

Nothing to show

  • +Limited information, but if more reviews were provided, I could identify common appreciation themes.

Nothing to show

  • +Affordable tuition and accessible programs
  • +Diverse and multicultural student body
  • +Supportive and approachable faculty
Cons
  • -Exam issues like insufficient time and difficulty.
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a recurring complaint.
  • -Lack of effective teaching and curriculum engagement frustrates students.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of support are common complaints.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are perceived as ineffective or irrelevant.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Facilities are consistently described as outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Course content and teaching quality often fall short of expectations.
Rating summary
What students say

Student life and location emerge as the university's strongest attributes, both receiving ratings above 4.3. Internationality and facilities also score highly, near 4.3 and 4.29 respectively. Professors and overall value are rated well, exceeding 4.2 and 4.0 respectively. The weakest area identified is accommodation, with a rating of 3.77.

An institution demonstrates significant strengths, with nearly all aspects receiving a strong 4.5-star rating. Facilities, professors, location, and overall value are particularly impressive. Student life and internationality also score well at 4 and 4.0 respectively. The weakest area appears to be accommodation, which received a 3.5 rating, suggesting room for improvement in that category.

Exceptional marks for Location and Internationality highlight this institution's strengths. Professors and Value also received very positive feedback. Conversely, Facilities represent a clear area for improvement, with Accomodation also scoring moderately. Student Life presents a mixed picture, landing in the middle range of ratings.

Nothing to show

This institution excels in **Location**, receiving a perfect score, and also garners strong marks for **Professors**, **Student Life**, and **Internationality**. Conversely, **Value** stands out as its weakest area, scoring a 2. **Facilities** and **Accomodation** are rated moderately. Overall, the university offers a very appealing environment for students, though prospective students might want to carefully consider the perceived value.

Nothing to show

This institution excels in areas such as **Location** and **Student Life**, both receiving perfect scores. The **Value** offered also stands out, earning a top rating. Conversely, its **Internationality** is a significant weakness, scoring only a single point. Ratings for **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Accomodation** are moderate, all receiving a score of three.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.24 average rating, ~85% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong academics, affordable and safe city location, and good student support. A small minority (~1.2%) noted issues with exam time constraints.

With an average rating of 4.5/5, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Reviewers highlight outstanding academic quality, supportive professors, and a vibrant campus atmosphere. No negative feedback was recorded.

All 40 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.05/5. Students highlight competent and helpful faculty, strong advising, and value for money. No negative feedback was recorded.

Nothing to show

With a single review, this university has an average rating of 4 out of 5 stars. The feedback was entirely positive, indicating no negative experiences were reported.

Nothing to show

The single review is highly positive, rating the university 5/5. It praises affordable prices and access to sought-after programs like Civil Engineering. Positive aspects also include a multicultural environment, approachable professors, and convenient city-center location.

Rating distribution
5★
43%
50%
5%
0%
0%
0%
100%
4★
40%
50%
95%
0%
100%
0%
0%
3★
16%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close