The Hebrew University of Jerusalem vs University of Massachusetts Dartmouth - UMass Dartmouth vs West Pomeranian Business School - ZPSB vs Universitas Terbuka - UT vs Murang'a University of Technology

Side-by-side comparison from 38 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: West Pomeranian Business School - ZPSB (5.00)
The Hebrew University of Jerusalem: wins 0/5 categories
University of Massachusetts Dartmouth - UMass Dartmouth: wins 0/5 categories
West Pomeranian Business School - ZPSB: wins 5/5 categories
Universitas Terbuka - UT: wins 0/5 categories
Murang'a University of Technology: wins 0/5 categories
Bow Valley College: wins 0/5 categories
Cebu Normal University - CNU: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Political Science
Best programme: Business Administration
Jakarta, Indonesia
4.50
Read more reviews
18 reviews
×
Best programme: Management
Best programme: Software Engineering
Calgary, Canada
4.50
Read more reviews
6 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration
Cebu City, Philippines
4.00
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: BA English and Classical Studies
Category ratings
Facilities
4.50
4.00
5.00
Win
4.28
3.83
4.83
3.00
Location
4.50
4.00
5.00
4.59
4.29
4.50
5.00
Professors
4.50
3.00
5.00
Win
4.17
4.14
4.33
4.67
Internationality
4.00
3.00
5.00
Win
4.17
3.43
4.50
3.33
Student life
4.00
5.00
5.00
4.17
4.00
4.50
3.00
Value
4.50
3.00
5.00
Win
4.39
3.86
4.67
4.67
Accommodation
3.50
4.00
5.00
Win
4.13
3.86
3.80
3.67
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Outstanding academic quality and supportive professors
  • +Vibrant and intellectually stimulating campus atmosphere
  • +Blend of theoretical and practical learning

Nothing to show

  • +Welcoming environment and heartwarming atmosphere
  • +Manageable cost of living and food
  • +Positive overall study experience
  • +Flexible and accessible distance learning for working professionals.
  • +Well-structured academic programs with good quality materials.
  • +Supportive faculty and organized learning environment.
  • +Strong academics and dedicated lecturers
  • +Vibrant campus life and sense of community
  • +Quality IT and applied science programs
  • +Supportive instructors and engaging learning environment
  • +Diverse and welcoming international student community
  • +Valuable programs with practical experiences
  • +Quality education and well-equipped graduates
  • +Motivating academic standards
Cons
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a recurring complaint.
  • -Lack of effective teaching and curriculum engagement frustrates students.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Lack of support and communication from staff is a problem.
  • -Lack of effective communication and administrative issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and curriculum relevance.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are prevalent concerns.
  • -Communication breakdowns and unresponsiveness from staff create a negative experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support create feelings of neglect.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
  • -Course content and teaching quality are often seen as lacking.
Rating summary
What students say

An institution demonstrates significant strengths, with nearly all aspects receiving a strong 4.5-star rating. Facilities, professors, location, and overall value are particularly impressive. Student life and internationality also score well at 4 and 4.0 respectively. The weakest area appears to be accommodation, which received a 3.5 rating, suggesting room for improvement in that category.

Nothing to show

Exceptional ratings were awarded across all surveyed categories, indicating a consistently strong performance for the university. Areas achieving perfect scores include facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. No specific weakest areas were identified, with the institution demonstrating a uniform excellence in all assessed aspects.

With an exceptional score of 4.59, the university's **location** stands out as its strongest attribute. Other well-regarded areas include **facilities** (4.28) and **value** (4.39). The **accommodation** score, at 4.13, is slightly lower in comparison but still reflects a positive reception across most surveyed aspects of student experience.

With several strong points, this university garners high marks for its location, closely followed by its professors and student life. Accommodation and value also received solid scores. However, internationality is a noted area for improvement, as is the rating for facilities. Overall, it presents a mixed but generally positive picture, with a few distinct areas of excellence and some opportunities for growth.

This institution garners exceptional scores for its **Facilities**, achieving a near-perfect 4.83. **Professors** and **Location** also score highly, both at 4.5, alongside a strong showing in **Student Life** and **Internationality**. **Value** is another significant strength at 4.67. The only area receiving a comparatively lower rating is **Accomodation**, standing at 3.8.

This institution demonstrates significant strengths in its **location** and **value**, both receiving perfect and near-perfect scores, respectively. **Professors** also garnered a high rating. Conversely, the university's **facilities** and **student life** are areas where ratings are lower, suggesting potential for improvement in these aspects. **Accommodations** and **internationality** fall somewhere in the middle of the spectrum.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.5/5, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Reviewers highlight outstanding academic quality, supportive professors, and a vibrant campus atmosphere. No negative feedback was recorded.

Nothing to show

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, the sole review is overwhelmingly positive, highlighting a dream-like experience. Students praise the welcoming environment and manageable living costs. No negative feedback was recorded.

With a 4.5/5 average rating and no negative feedback, students praise flexibility for working professionals and accessible, well-organized materials. ~94% of feedback is positive.

University reviews show high satisfaction, with ~100% positive feedback. Students highlight dedicated lecturers and solid academics. Some noted areas for improvement in facilities and results.

With an average rating of 4.5/5 from 6 reviews, approximately 83% are highly positive. Students praise the friendly environment, diverse cultures, valuable programs, and supportive instructors, especially for international students. No negative feedback was recorded.

With an average rating of 4/5, reviews are predominantly positive (~67%). Students praise the quality of education, highlighting its effectiveness in producing well-equipped individuals. No negative feedback was recorded.

Rating distribution
5★
50%
0%
100%
56%
43%
67%
33%
4★
50%
0%
0%
39%
57%
17%
33%
3★
0%
100%
0%
6%
0%
17%
33%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close