Universidad de la Sabana vs Universidad de Cundinamarca - UCUNDINAMARCA vs Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA vs Brno University of Technology vs Universidade Federal do Tocantins

Side-by-side comparison from 19 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN COLLEGE (5.00)
Universidad de la Sabana: wins 1/6 categories
Universidad de Cundinamarca - UCUNDINAMARCA: wins 0/6 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/6 categories
Brno University of Technology: wins 1/6 categories
Universidade Federal do Tocantins: wins 0/6 categories
WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN COLLEGE: wins 4/6 categories
Faculty of Law, University of Lisbon - FDUL: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Cundinamarca, Colombia
4.60
Read more reviews
11 reviews
×
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Chemical Engineering
Best programme: Visual Communication Design
Category ratings
Facilities
4.33
Not rated
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.00
Location
4.11
Not rated
Not rated
4.67
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Professors
4.78
Not rated
Not rated
4.17
Not rated
5.00
Win
1.00
Internationality
4.44
Not rated
Not rated
4.50
Win
Not rated
4.00
3.00
Student life
4.56
Not rated
Not rated
4.67
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.00
Value
4.44
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
4.00
3.00
Accommodation
4.56
Not rated
Not rated
3.83
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent academic quality and comprehensive programs
  • +Beautiful campus and enriching environment
  • +Humanistic approach and personal development focus

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Strong interdisciplinary programmes and innovation culture
  • +Excellent facilities, cutting-edge labs, and industry collaboration
  • +Vibrant student community and city integration

Nothing to show

  • +Strong campus culture and student involvement
  • +Good brand recognition
  • +Engaging and knowledgeable instructors
  • +Relevant and practical course content
  • +Supportive and friendly community
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative & management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Lack of practical application and career relevance is a major concern.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor resource availability are major drawbacks.
  • -Instruction quality and course relevance are frequently criticized.
  • -Teacher favoritism and arbitrary grading practices are a significant issue.
  • -Lack of clear and fair assessment criteria is frustrating.
Rating summary
What students say

With a diverse set of ratings, this institution excels in its academic offerings, evidenced by an outstanding score for Professors. Student Life and Accommodations also receive very high marks. While Facilities are rated positively, they represent the lowest score among the surveyed areas. The university demonstrates solid performance across Location, Internationality, and Value.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution receives particularly strong acclaim for its **Location** and **Student Life**, both scoring an impressive 4.7. **Internationality** also ranks highly at 4.5. While most aspects are rated positively, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area, with a rating of 3.8. **Facilities** and **Value** are solid with scores of 4.3, and **Professors** are rated 4.2.

Nothing to show

This institution receives outstanding scores in several key areas, notably its facilities, professors, location, student life, and accommodation, all earning a perfect 5 out of 5. Areas for potential improvement lie in internationality and value, which are rated a solid 4 out of 5, indicating good but not exceptional standing.

With a standout score for its location, this institution demonstrates significant strengths there. Conversely, the ratings indicate a notable weakness in professor quality. The university received average scores in facilities, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, suggesting a consistent, middle-ground experience across these aspects.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With 11 reviews and an average of 4.64/5 stars, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight the excellent academic quality, beautiful campus, and humanistic approach. There is no negative feedback.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

All 6 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.17/5. Students praise the university's interdisciplinary programs, innovation culture, modern facilities, and supportive community, alongside the student-friendly city of Brno.

Nothing to show

This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (100%), with students highlighting campus life and brand recognition. There is no negative feedback provided.

The single review is negative, giving a 2/5 rating. The student expressed dissatisfaction with teachers imposing prestige and discipline, grading arbitrarily based on participation over exam performance, and showing favoritism.

Rating distribution
5★
64%
0%
0%
17%
0%
100%
0%
4★
36%
0%
0%
83%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close