Université de Tours vs Polytech Tours vs Excelia Business School vs ESG Ecoles de Commerce vs UFR Droit, Economie et Sciences Sociales - Université de Tours
Side-by-side comparison from 86 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Competent and approachable professors.
- +Excellent international student support and integration activities.
- +Convenient city-center location with cultural diversity.
Nothing to show
- +Practical learning, internships, and experienced instructors.
- +International exposure and multicultural environment.
- +High-quality teaching and good course content.
- +Practical, career-oriented education with real-life projects
- +Attentive, available staff and enriching, well-supported courses
- +Strong business connections and diversified program choices
Nothing to show
- +Rigorous, relevant courses and expert, accessible teaching
- +Valuable practical experience through internships and networking
- +Attentive, supportive staff and accessible, quality resources
- +Strong programmes in IT, marketing, design, and web development
- +Opportunities for skill development and advancement
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities are a significant drawback for students.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring complaint.
Nothing to show
- -Superficial academic content and lack of practical value.
- -Ineffective career support, including internships and apprenticeships.
- -Courses not aligning with student expectations or career goals.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently problematic.
- -Lack of essential resources and support hinders learning.
- -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are common complaints.
- -The curriculum and teaching methods are often perceived as ineffective or irrelevant.
This university garners exceptional scores, particularly excelling in its prime Location, which received a perfect 5. Student Life, Internationality, and Value are also highly rated at 4.33. Professors and Accommodations score well with 4.33 and 4 respectively. The weakest area, though still solid, is Facilities, with a rating of 3.5.
Nothing to show
Performing exceptionally well, this university boasts its strongest ratings in **Location** (4.30) and **Internationality** (4.30), closely followed by **Student Life** (4.25). Areas for potential improvement include **Accomodation**, which received the lowest score at 3.66, and **Professors** and **Value**, both rated at 3.91. The **Facilities** score stands at a respectable 4.02.
Perceived strengths of this university lie in its **Professors** and **Location**, both receiving high marks. Conversely, **Student Life** and **Accomodation** present the weakest areas, indicating room for improvement. **Facilities** and **Internationality** fall into the mid-range, while **Value** is rated moderately well. This academic institution offers a diverse set of attributes for prospective students.
Nothing to show
**Across various metrics, the institution demonstrates notable strengths and areas for development.** Professors and location stand out as exceptionally strong, both receiving a high rating of 4.8. Internationality also scores well at 4.4. Conversely, student life and accommodation are the weakest areas, with ratings of 3.4 and 3.6 respectively. Facilities and overall value are rated solidly in the mid-range.
Overall, this institution presents a commendable profile, with its strongest areas being Professors, Location, Student Life, and Accomodation, all receiving a solid 4 out of 5. Value also scores highly at 4. However, its weakest area lies in Internationality, scoring a modest 2, indicating room for improvement in global engagement. Facilities are rated moderately at 3.
With 7 total reviews and an average rating of 4.71/5, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight competent professors, excellent international student services, and diverse cultural activities. One minor point of difficulty was navigating some campus buildings.
Nothing to show
With a 4.07/5 average, ~82% of reviews are positive, highlighting international opportunities, practical learning, and a multicultural environment. A small ~4.5% of feedback is negative, citing superficial course coverage and limited practical value.
University reviews indicate a positive experience, with ~67% of feedback being highly positive. Students highlight excellent teaching support, enriching courses, and practical, career-oriented education.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.2/5, ~80% of reviews are positive. Students praise rigorous, relevant courses, expert teachers, and opportunities for skill development and career preparation. A small portion of feedback noted occasional changes to the schedule.
With a 4/5 average rating, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). One review highlights strong benefits for informatics, marketing, design, and web development, noting significant skill development in design. No negative feedback was recorded.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show