Universidad Sergio Arboleda vs Gato Dumas Colegio de Gatronomía vs Instituto Superior Mariano Moreno - ISMM vs Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios - UNIMINUTO vs Universidad de La Salle - LASALLE

Side-by-side comparison from 22 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Universidad Sergio Arboleda: wins 1/6 categories
Gato Dumas Colegio de Gatronomía: wins 0/6 categories
Instituto Superior Mariano Moreno - ISMM: wins 0/6 categories
Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios - UNIMINUTO: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad de La Salle - LASALLE: wins 1/6 categories
Universidad Libre - UniLibre: wins 4/6 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Industrial Engineering
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Economics and Finance
Best programme: Medicine
Category ratings
Facilities
4.11
Not rated
Not rated
4.20
4.33
5.00
Win
Not rated
Location
4.56
Not rated
Not rated
3.80
4.33
5.00
Win
Not rated
Professors
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.17
4.67
Win
4.50
Not rated
Internationality
4.33
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
3.00
3.50
Not rated
Student life
4.44
Not rated
Not rated
4.20
4.33
5.00
Win
Not rated
Value
4.22
Not rated
Not rated
4.50
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Accommodation
3.89
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
3.67
5.00
Win
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Passionate professors and vibrant learning environment
  • +Modern facilities and academic opportunities
  • +Strong career support and personal development

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Accessible and opportunity-focused education for diverse backgrounds
  • +Engaging and interactive learning with skilled, supportive professors
  • +Practical programs promoting personal and professional growth
  • +Excellent professors and quality education/curriculum
  • +Strong focus on ethics and humanistic values
  • +Downtown campus offering urban experience
  • +High-quality academics and clinical programs with qualified instructors.
  • +Focus on humanities, values, and leadership development for societal impact.
  • +Supportive learning environment with approachable teachers and accessible facilities.

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Lack of academic rigor and unchallenging coursework.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Poor syllabus quality and outdated academic programs are disappointing.
  • -There are significant administrative and management issues present.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a problem.
  • -Poor teaching quality and insufficient academic support are disliked.
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are a common complaint.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are often criticized.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **location**, receiving a high rating of 4.56, and in its **student life**, scoring 4.44. **Facilities** also fare well with a rating of 4.11. Conversely, the **accommodation** category shows the lowest score at 3.89, indicating it as a potential area for improvement. Ratings for professors, internationality, and value fall within a solid mid-range.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution shines particularly in its value for money, boasting a 4.5 rating. Facilities and student life also received strong marks at 4.2, closely followed by professors at 4.17. However, accommodation and internationality represent areas for potential improvement, both scoring a 3. Location, while decent at 3.8, is not a standout feature compared to the university's strengths.

This university demonstrates exceptional strengths, with an outstanding perfect score for **Value** and high marks for its **Professors**. The **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Student Life** also received solid ratings. However, **Accomodation** is a moderately weaker area, and **Internationality** received the lowest score among the surveyed aspects.

This institution receives outstanding marks for its facilities, location, student life, accommodation, and overall value, all scoring a perfect five. Professors are also highly regarded, with a strong 4.5 rating. The university's weakest area is internationality, which received a 3.5, indicating room for growth in that aspect.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

About 56% of reviews are positive, highlighting academic opportunities, professors, and growth. A small portion (11.1%) of negative feedback mentions a lack of academic challenge and lazy professors.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With 5 positive reviews (~63%) and 1 negative (~12.5%), students highlight accessible education and practical programs. Some appreciate teacher quality and learning technology, while one found syllabus issues in a specific program.

All reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.33/5 stars. Students praise excellent teachers, quality education, and professional training that instills values and ethics.

Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%) with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise academic excellence, qualified teachers, and facilities, along with a focus on humanities and values.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
11%
0%
0%
43%
33%
33%
0%
4★
44%
0%
0%
29%
67%
67%
0%
3★
33%
0%
0%
29%
0%
0%
0%
2★
11%
0%
0%
14%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close