Universidad de Carabobo - UC vs Vilnius Tech vs Ecole d'Ingenieurs - ESAIP vs EAC Group – Artistic and Cultural Engineering vs Universidad José Antonio Páez - UJAP
Side-by-side comparison from 69 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent professors and quality teaching
- +Good campus facilities and activities
- +Strong academic programs and ethical training
- +Practical, future-oriented programs and strong academic curriculum
- +Inspiring, collaborative environment and creative innovation focus
- +Supportive professors, clear explanations, and useful, relevant subjects
- +Study abroad opportunities
- +Diverse campus locations
- +Flexible degree pathways
Nothing to show
- +Excellent professors and comprehensive curriculum
- +Modern and well-equipped facilities, including labs
- +Strong connection between academics and practical/work fields
- +Practical and industry-relevant education
- +Supportive and helpful professors
- +Diverse international student body
- +quality education and useful skills
- +supportive and knowledgeable lecturers
- +valuable extracurricular activities and affordable fees
- -Administrative & management issues.
- -Lack of resources and outdated facilities.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of support and resources impacts student experience.
- -Excessive administrative burdens and opaque management practices frustrate students.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff creates confusion and dissatisfaction.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a consistent complaint.
- -The curriculum is perceived as unengaging and irrelevant by many.
- -Administrative and management issues caused significant problems.
- -Outdated facilities and poor condition of buildings were a major concern.
- -Lack of organized support for international students was evident.
- -Administrative and management issues disrupt student experience.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support leads to frustration.
The university exhibits a strong valuation of 4, with professors receiving a notable 4.33. Student life and location are also well-regarded at 3.67. The weakest area appears to be accommodation, scoring a 2.67, while facilities and internationality fall within the mid-range. Overall, this institution offers a good balance, excelling in academic and student engagement aspects but facing challenges with housing.
This institution demonstrates commendable strengths, particularly in its **Location**, receiving the highest rating. **Student Life** also scores very favorably. While all aspects are well-regarded, **Accomodation** received the lowest score among the assessed areas, indicating room for improvement in that specific category. Overall, the university presents a solid offering with distinct highlights.
This institution excels in several key areas, earning top marks for its Professors, Location, and Internationality. Conversely, Facilities, Accomodation, and Value received moderate ratings, indicating these might be areas for improvement. Student Life offers a positive experience, falling between the exceptional and moderate scores.
Nothing to show
Examining university ratings reveals a highly regarded institution. Its strongest areas are clearly Professors (4.75) and Student Life (4.675), indicating excellent academic instruction and vibrant campus activities. Facilities and Location also score well. However, Accomodation (3.475) and particularly Internationality (2.95) present areas for improvement. The overall Value (4.175) suggests a positive return for students.
Offering a mixed but generally positive assessment, this institution excels in **Accomodation**, receiving a high score of 4.2. Other strengths include **Professors**, **Location**, and **Internationality**, all rated at 3.8. The university's **Facilities** and **Student Life** are its weakest points, both scoring 3.2, while **Value** sits at a moderate 3.4.
This institution receives excellent marks in several key areas, with **Value** standing out as its strongest suit. Professors and Student Life also earned particularly high ratings. Conversely, **Internationality** presents the greatest opportunity for improvement, alongside Facilities and Accommodation, which received moderate scores. Location is also a well-regarded aspect.
University reviews are predominantly positive (~86%), highlighting academic excellence, great professors, and good facilities. A small amount of feedback (~14%) notes a need for improved maintenance.
University reviews are highly positive, with ~100% giving 4-5 stars and an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise well-structured, future-oriented programs, practical applications, and excellent academic facilities.
With one positive and zero negative reviews, feedback is scarce. The average rating is 3.5/5, suggesting a generally positive sentiment (~50% positive). One reviewer praised international study opportunities.
Nothing to show
All 5 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.2/5. Recurring themes highlight excellent teachers, a complete curriculum, and good facilities. Some suggest incorporating more practical, work-field-linked programs and improved computer lab installations.
With 3 out of 5 reviews being positive, students generally find the university offers practical training and helpful professors. Around 20% of feedback noted issues with course availability or administrative support.
With an average rating of 4.5/5 from 8 reviews, ~88% are positive. Students praise the excellent education quality, supportive and knowledgeable lecturers, and useful curriculum. The university also encourages soft skill development and offers affordable fees in a good learning environment.
The University of Carabobo is an excellent place to consider to study higher education. In addition, it is one of the main institutions of university education with the highest demand in the State of Carabobo, as a student of the Faculty of Engineering, I think that it is one of the best Faculties has a great demand for its educational excellence. The UC is a good option to consider for all those who wish to study higher education in Venezuela. As in every institution there will always be things to improve and perfect, I mean in terms of infrastructure in the case of the Faculty of Engineering.
VGTU is one of the best technical universities in Lithuania. They provide many field of studies for students and good environemnet for studies at all. Moreover, its International office provides many opportunities to study or doing internship abroad, thus have cooperation with many international universities around the world. Thanks to VGTU, I got a summer internship 2019 in Belgium and received good feedback there and, at the moment, I am studying in Estonia by bilateral agreement. I especially want to note teachers staff of the department where I study. They are good specialists and share necessary experience during lectures which can be useful for the future job. Furthermore, sometimes they send us actual vacancies and give recommendations to some companies who are ready to consider students' applications. For me personally this university "opened a window of life". I have met a lot of people from other countries, learned new things and got valuable life experience.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I was an Erasmus Student at this University(Banky faculty) in spring semester 19/20. It was the worst Erasmus ever. Only 4/9 subjects which I choose in my Learning Agreement existed in the Neptun system( which is compulsory for every student). So I had only 8/30 ECTS in the first week. Firstly, the coordinators answered my e-mails, but it wasn’t so useful, because they only said: “everything is good don’t mind we will fix it”. (If you try to choose another subject from the “subjects list for Erasmus student” (which is on official page) be ready, that 85% of subjects don’t exist in Neptun or don’t have any places for you. ) After 10000 e-mails with asking for help, they stopped responding to me. It was already the end of the second week of studying when I realize that nothing will change and I couldn’t reach the necessary 30ECTS. I had to return to my home Uni not to miss this semester. I don’t know who is responsible for this situation and I don’t wish anyone to be in my place. So... if you want to spoil your Erasmus, waste money, time and Nerves then go to Obuda University.
Nothing to show
