Universidad Iberoamericana - IBERO vs Centro de Estudios Universitarios del Nuevo Occidente - CEUNO vs I. Horbachevsky Ternopil State Medical University - TDMU vs Hotel and Tourism Management Institute Switzerland - HTMi vs National University - NU
Side-by-side comparison from 27 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Expert professors and high academic rigor
- +Strong practical and hands-on learning experiences
- +Positive student environment and well-planned programs
- +Adequate and complete study plans, skill development
- +Helpful teamwork and real-world preparation
- +Trained and specialized teachers
- +Strong academic foundation and qualified professors
- +Affordable tuition
- +Well-planned calendar and constant communication
- +Reputable programs and career enhancement
- +Valuable internship and job training networks
- +Opportunities for paid internships
- +High-quality education and supportive professors
- +Financial aid options and focus on student well-being
- +Academic and extracurricular support
- +Practical skills and modern tools
- +Helpful instructors and clear explanations
- +Confidence and portfolio building
Nothing to show
- -Outdated study programs and inadequate coordinator training.
- -Administrative and management issues are a constant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently mentioned.
- -Poor communication and a lack of transparency create confusion and dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of necessary resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and a lack of student support are prevalent concerns.
- -Inconsistent and chaotic scheduling causes disruptions.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources negatively impact the learning environment.
- -Poor communication and a lack of student support are major concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited as a major frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring complaint.
- -Communication breakdowns and a perceived lack of support contribute to student dissatisfaction.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its vibrant **Student Life** and highly regarded **Professors**, both scoring an impressive 4.5. **Location** also receives a high mark. Conversely, **Internationality** stands out as a weaker area, with a considerably lower rating. Other aspects like Facilities, Value, and Accomodation fall within a solid mid-range.
Overall, this university received identical ratings of zero across all surveyed categories, indicating a uniform lack of positive reception in every aspect. There are no discernible strongest or weakest areas, as all facets of the institution appear equally unrated or critically deficient. The provided data suggests a universally unaccommodating or non-existent status for facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value.
This institution excels in several key areas, particularly its professors, internationality, and value, all receiving high marks. Student life and accommodation are also well-regarded. Conversely, the university's location presents a notable weakness, with a significantly lower rating compared to other aspects. Facilities are rated solidly, contributing to an overall positive impression.
Offering an excellent academic experience, this institution shines with top marks in Professors and Location. Student Life is a notably weaker area, indicated by a lower rating. Facilities and Accomodation are well-regarded, with Internationality also receiving high scores. The Value for money presents an opportunity for improvement.
This university presents a mixed but generally positive picture. It excels in **Value**, receiving the highest rating, and also scores very well for **Location** and **Student Life**. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as its weakest area. Ratings for **Professors** and **Internationality** are solid, while **Facilities** fall in the middle range.
This institution excels in several key areas, achieving perfect scores for its facilities, professors, and student life. Its internationality is also highly rated. However, the university's location and accommodation received more moderate scores. Overall, it presents a strong offering with a good value proposition.
Nothing to show
The vast majority of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent academic programs, expert professors, and practical learning experiences. A small portion of feedback suggests improvements to program currency and coordinator training.
With an average rating of 4/5, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students praise the adequate and complete study plans that develop individual skills and teamwork. There is minimal negative feedback, representing approximately 0% of all reviews.
With an average rating of 4.5/5 from two reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Students highlight a strong academic foundation, dedicated professors, and affordable tuition as key benefits. Communication and a well-planned calendar are also frequently praised.
University student reviews are mixed, with a 2.5/5 average rating. Approximately 50% of feedback is negative, citing issues like chaotic scheduling and overlapping duties. Positive feedback highlights the school's reputation and internship opportunities.
With an average rating of 4/5 from 3 reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~67%). Students highlight quality education, supportive professors, and available scholarships. A minor point (~33%) noted issues with student accommodation during enrollment.
With one review, the feedback is overwhelmingly positive, earning a 5/5 average. This single review highlights exceeding expectations, gaining practical skills, learning modern tools, and helpful instructors.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Usually I trust reviews and they have never let me down, until 2023, when I chose to continue the bsc culinary course at this place. I wish someone told me this before my “study” there. First, I couldn’t get my proper classes schedule for 3 weeks. When the schedule finally came, it was chaotic, with daily kitchen duties overlapping with theoretical classes (By the way, I have No complaints about most of the theoretical classes, they were rare for culinary students but to the point and interesting - the only one plus). The kitchen duties were overwhelming, covering 24 days a month, and I almost never had the chance to attend a practical cooking class or even write down a single recipe, as all practical part was under MIT - people who working for HTMI as volunteers to get 1 year Swiss visa. These MIT used to talk with me very badly and always gave the task to clean or bring/peal for them vegetables, they directly told us that culinary students here to work, not enjoy their study. There was no culinary instructor for my course. And almost every event on Friday for students I had to be all day in the kitchen to cook for HTMI and after clean kitchen. I felt like I was working as a servant at the school, preparing meals and performing tasks for the kitchen MIT. The quality of the food was poor, sometimes even totally vegetarian days, and everything was prepared by the students, with the exception of desserts. Desserts were prepared with pastry students, but even pastry chef visits to the main kitchen were rare, and his desserts plating was outdated (like previous century, no one plate this way now in fine dining restaurants. Anyway, at least one teacher whom I sometimes even had to beg to attend his classes instead of “learning” how to clean kitchen and steam rice from MIT) They even taught us to plate dishes in a clock style 🤣) In the event planning class, we were expected to find our sponsors to organize an event as a part of the study, which forced us to seek support from local hotels and supermarkets, couldn’t really do it… They also forgot to give me my iPad in the beginning, when I asked, they say I’m trying to cheat them. I also had to pay my insurance twice. I was hoping on internship, but even that was below then Macdonalds level, i had to prepare sandwiches and salads for hotel staff, HTMI career center that time stoped replying my emails.. The experience was so depressing that I had to take antidepressants to cope with the stress. I strongly recommend that parents of prospective students look elsewhere in Switzerland and avoid these scams. I’m also attaching pictures from our “culinary classes” with MIT and accordingly the same food that was given to the students for 3500 franks per 12 weeks. Thank you for the attention 🙏🏼
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
