Universidad Externado de Colombia - UEC vs Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano - UTADEO vs Universidad Autónoma de Colombia - FUAC vs Universidad Católica de Colombia - UCATOLICA vs Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia - UCC
Side-by-side comparison from 39 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High-quality, specialized programs
- +Excellent professors and diverse student body
- +Opportunities for international experience and professional growth
- +High-quality faculty and engaging teaching methods
- +Strong curriculum and diverse, recognized programs
- +Efficient support services and professional growth opportunities
Nothing to show
- +Strong academic programs with qualified instructors and research opportunities.
- +Practical learning experiences and updated course content.
- +Accessible location and vibrant campus life.
- +Strong social and community focus
- +Early patient contact and practical skill development
- +Student voice and equitable treatment
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently criticized.
- -Lack of support and unclear communication contribute to student dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
- -Course content and teaching methods are often perceived as irrelevant or ineffective.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a recurring problem.
- -The curriculum is sometimes perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are a major concern.
- -Communication and organization are frequently criticized as poor.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates very strong performance, with its highest marks awarded to Professors (4.69) and its Facilities and Value (both 4.62). Location and Student Life also received excellent scores (4.54). The area with the lowest rating, though still respectable, is Internationality (4.31), followed closely by Accomodation (4.42).
Across multiple aspects, this institution receives commendations. Student life stands out as the strongest area, achieving the highest rating. The university also performs exceptionally well in professors, location, and accommodation. On the other hand, its weakest area is internationality, which, while still solid, is rated lower than other categories. Overall, the university presents a very positive picture, with a particularly strong showing in student engagement and academic resources.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates a strong performance in several key areas, particularly excelling in **location** with a rating of 4.5. **Professors**, **student life**, and **accommodation** also received favorable scores of 4. The university's **internationality** is its weakest area, rated at 3. Facilities are rated moderately at 3.5, while the overall **value** is considered good at 4.
Overall, the university receives commendable ratings. Its strongest areas are Facilities and Professors, both scoring 4.5 and 4.625 respectively, closely followed by Location and Value. Student Life and Accomodation are rated well at 4. The university's weakest area is Internationality, with a score of 3.875, though this still indicates a generally positive reception.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With a 4.61 average rating, students praise its quality programs, excellent facilities, and international opportunities for professional growth. No negative feedback was recorded among the 18 reviews.
With an average rating of 4.88/5 from 8 reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Students praise high-quality faculty, excellent curriculum, state-of-the-art facilities, and transformative learning experiences. No negative feedback was reported.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.33/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight qualified instructors, strong research promotion, and efforts to improve practical education. No negative feedback was received.
All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.56/5. Students highlight meaningful experiences, practical patient contact, and a strong social focus. Some mention timetable distribution issues.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show