London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs ONCAMPUS Global vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs Keele University - KLE vs Edge Hill Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 386 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Marketable courses and high academic standards
- +Excellent, expert faculty with industry experience
- +Supportive, respectful, and flexible learning environment
- +Excellent academic preparation and progression support
- +Supportive and engaging teaching staff
- +Positive student life and opportunities
- +Connecting theory to practice through real-world cases.
- +Diverse international environment and global opportunities.
- +Relevant industry-focused courses and knowledgeable faculty.
- +High-quality teaching and strong academic support
- +Supportive learning environment and student services
- +Practical training and industry/career focus
- +excellent student support
- +engaging remote learning
- +exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable, approachable instructors
- +strong emphasis on precision, quality, and professional skill development
- +welcoming environment and supportive alumni network
Nothing to show
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of structure in programs.
- -High fees are not justified by the quality of education and support.
- -Limited social life and inadequate student support services.
- -Students dislike administrative inefficiencies and poor management.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a significant concern.
- -The curriculum and teaching quality are often criticized as being insufficient.
- -Perceived as a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
- -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Unclear communication and lack of student support are prevalent.
- -Frustration with administrative and management issues.
- -Concerns about outdated facilities and resources.
- -Dissatisfaction with course content and teaching quality.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of career support and industry relevance leads to dissatisfaction.
Nothing to show
With a strong emphasis on **Internationality** (4.80) and **Location** (4.78), this institution presents a globally connected and well-situated environment. Professors also receive high marks (4.26). Conversely, **Student Life** (3.63) and **Accommodations** (3.79) are the areas with the lowest reported satisfaction, suggesting room for improvement in campus vibrancy and living arrangements.
This institution receives generally strong ratings from students. The strongest areas are Professors, with an exceptional score of 4.71, closely followed by Accomodation at 4.67 and Location at 4.5. Facilities and Student Life are also well-regarded, both scoring 4.4. The weakest area is Value, though it still holds a respectable 4.29. Internationality also performs well, averaging 4.43.
This institution performs well across most aspects, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest area. Facilities, Professors, and Value also receive high marks. Areas for potential improvement include **Location**, which scored the lowest, and Accomodation. Student life and the overall value proposition are rated solidly in the mid-to-high range.
This institution receives commendable scores across most metrics. Professors, Internationality, and Facilities stand out as particularly strong areas. The university also fares well in Student Life and Value. Location is rated adequately, though Accommodations emerge as the weakest point in the assessment, receiving a noticeably lower score compared to other categories.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strength, receiving perfect scores for its facilities, professors, accommodation, internationality, and overall value. Student life and location are also highly rated, scoring a respectable 4 out of 5. The university's weakest areas, though still very positive, are student life and location, suggesting minor room for improvement in these aspects while excelling elsewhere.
This institution receives high marks for its Location, scoring 4.78, and for its Professors and Internationality, both at 4.67. Facilities also rate well at 4.56. Student Life and Value are both solid at 4.00. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a rating of 3.22.
Nothing to show
Most reviews (~74%) praise marketable courses, expert faculty, and excellent research opportunities. Very few (~3.4%) express concerns about teaching quality, grading consistency, and career services.
All 7 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.57/5. Students praised outstanding teaching staff, excellent academic preparation for university progression, and helpful curriculum.
Most reviews (approximately 71%) highlight a positive learning atmosphere, inspiring professors, and valuable international experiences. A small amount of feedback (around 14%) suggests mediocrity and a focus on profit. The average rating is 3.86/5.
With ~100% positive sentiment, reviews highlight strong academic programs, industry connections, and supportive learning environments. Specific praise focuses on teaching quality, career support, and modern facilities.
The sole review is highly positive (100%), with a 5/5 average rating. The feedback highlights excellent support during challenging times and engaging remote learning resources.
All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight exceptional teaching quality and knowledgeable instructors, along with impeccable facilities. The curriculum and emphasis on precision are frequently praised.
Nothing to show
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
Nothing to show
