London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs University of Bristol vs ONCAMPUS Global vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs Keele University - KLE
Side-by-side comparison from 482 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Marketable courses and high academic standards
- +Excellent, expert faculty with industry experience
- +Supportive, respectful, and flexible learning environment
- +Friendly people, ease of meeting requirements, and abundant club activities.
- +Conducive learning environment, excellent staff/supervisor relationships, and accessible information.
- +Great facilities, engaging studies, and diverse program offerings.
- +Excellent academic preparation and progression support
- +Supportive and engaging teaching staff
- +Positive student life and opportunities
- +Connecting theory to practice through real-world cases.
- +Diverse international environment and global opportunities.
- +Relevant industry-focused courses and knowledgeable faculty.
- +High-quality teaching and strong academic support
- +Supportive learning environment and student services
- +Practical training and industry/career focus
- +exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable, approachable instructors
- +strong emphasis on precision, quality, and professional skill development
- +welcoming environment and supportive alumni network
- +Flexible, self-paced learning
- +Helpful instructors and fast support
- +Relevant and high-quality course material
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of structure in programs.
- -High fees are not justified by the quality of education and support.
- -Limited social life and inadequate student support services.
- -Poor student support services and ineffective handling of issues.
- -Fragmented campus and lack of community contribute to isolation.
- -Unengaging and unchallenging curriculum.
- -Students dislike administrative inefficiencies and poor management.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a significant concern.
- -The curriculum and teaching quality are often criticized as being insufficient.
- -Perceived as a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
- -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Unclear communication and lack of student support are prevalent.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of career support and industry relevance leads to dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a problem.
- -Poor course structure and teaching quality detract from the learning experience.
With a strong emphasis on **Internationality** (4.80) and **Location** (4.78), this institution presents a globally connected and well-situated environment. Professors also receive high marks (4.26). Conversely, **Student Life** (3.63) and **Accommodations** (3.79) are the areas with the lowest reported satisfaction, suggesting room for improvement in campus vibrancy and living arrangements.
A notable performance is observed across several aspects, with Location and Student Life receiving particularly high marks. Professors and Internationality also scored well, indicating robust academic and global engagement. Facilities and Value present a solid middle ground. The weakest area, however, is Accomodation, suggesting this is an aspect that could benefit from improvement to align with the university's otherwise strong offerings.
This institution receives generally strong ratings from students. The strongest areas are Professors, with an exceptional score of 4.71, closely followed by Accomodation at 4.67 and Location at 4.5. Facilities and Student Life are also well-regarded, both scoring 4.4. The weakest area is Value, though it still holds a respectable 4.29. Internationality also performs well, averaging 4.43.
This institution performs well across most aspects, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest area. Facilities, Professors, and Value also receive high marks. Areas for potential improvement include **Location**, which scored the lowest, and Accomodation. Student life and the overall value proposition are rated solidly in the mid-to-high range.
This institution receives commendable scores across most metrics. Professors, Internationality, and Facilities stand out as particularly strong areas. The university also fares well in Student Life and Value. Location is rated adequately, though Accommodations emerge as the weakest point in the assessment, receiving a noticeably lower score compared to other categories.
This institution receives high marks for its Location, scoring 4.78, and for its Professors and Internationality, both at 4.67. Facilities also rate well at 4.56. Student Life and Value are both solid at 4.00. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a rating of 3.22.
Across all surveyed categories, this institution received perfect scores. Every aspect, from facilities and professors to student life and accommodations, was rated a strong 5. Its prime location and international appeal also contributed to this uniformly excellent evaluation, indicating exceptional value for students. There are no discernible weak areas based on this data.
Most reviews (~74%) praise marketable courses, expert faculty, and excellent research opportunities. Very few (~3.4%) express concerns about teaching quality, grading consistency, and career services.
With a 4.26 average rating from 94 reviews, ~98% of feedback is positive. Students praise friendly people, accessible information, engaging studies, and excellent facilities. A small ~2% of reviews mention concerns about university services and campus configuration.
All 7 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.57/5. Students praised outstanding teaching staff, excellent academic preparation for university progression, and helpful curriculum.
Most reviews (approximately 71%) highlight a positive learning atmosphere, inspiring professors, and valuable international experiences. A small amount of feedback (around 14%) suggests mediocrity and a focus on profit. The average rating is 3.86/5.
With ~100% positive sentiment, reviews highlight strong academic programs, industry connections, and supportive learning environments. Specific praise focuses on teaching quality, career support, and modern facilities.
All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight exceptional teaching quality and knowledgeable instructors, along with impeccable facilities. The curriculum and emphasis on precision are frequently praised.
All three reviews are positive, with students praising flexibility and helpful instructors. They highlight acquiring skills and the convenience of self-paced learning.
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
Nothing to show
