University of Buea - UB vs National Institute of Technology Rourkela - NITRKL vs Biaka University Institute of Buea vs Saint Monica University Higher Institute vs National Institute and School of Applied Sciences of Centre Loire Valley - INSA

Side-by-side comparison from 51 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: National Institute of Technology Rourkela - NITRKL (5.00)
University of Buea - UB: wins 0/5 categories
National Institute of Technology Rourkela - NITRKL: wins 2/5 categories
Biaka University Institute of Buea: wins 3/5 categories
Saint Monica University Higher Institute: wins 0/5 categories
National Institute and School of Applied Sciences of Centre Loire Valley - INSA: wins 0/5 categories
School of Education of Viseu - Esev: wins 0/5 categories
University Centre of Sete Lagoas - Unifemm: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Electrical Engineering
Best programme: Nursing
Category ratings
Facilities
3.72
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
2.50
4.00
Location
4.42
2.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.50
3.00
Professors
4.22
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.50
4.00
Internationality
3.78
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
3.50
1.00
Student life
4.18
3.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
2.50
3.00
Value
4.18
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
3.00
Accommodation
3.68
4.00
Win
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
2.00
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical, hands-on knowledge and preparation for the job market
  • +Excellent teaching from seasoned professors and professionals
  • +Inspiring and beautiful campus environment
  • +Strong technical skills & practical experience
  • +Collaborative environment & learning support
  • +Research opportunities & good career outcomes
  • +Supportive learning environment and dedicated faculty
  • +Comprehensive curriculum with practical skill development
  • +Effective job market preparation

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Academic program intensity and socio-political disruptions.
  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently mentioned.
  • -Lack of engaging teaching methods and insufficient student support are concerns.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of communication and unclear expectations from staff are common complaints.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Assessing the university reveals a mixed but generally positive picture. The highest marks were awarded for **Location** and **Professors**, indicating excellent campus surroundings and a strong teaching staff. Conversely, **Facilities** and **Accomodation** received the lowest scores, suggesting room for improvement in these practical aspects. Student life, internationality, and value all performed well, sitting comfortably in the upper range of the ratings.

Offering strong value for money, this institution excels in several key areas. Facilities, professors, accommodation, and internationality all received high marks, indicating a well-resourced and globally-minded environment. Student life presents a good, though not exceptional, experience. The primary area for improvement lies in its location, which received the lowest rating.

This university excels in several key areas, receiving perfect scores for its professors, location, and student life. Internationality is also a strong suit, rated highly. Accommodations are rated moderately, while the facilities unfortunately received the lowest score. Overall, the university offers good value, with strengths clearly outweighing its single weakness.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Around 80% of reviews praise the university's academic excellence, practical learning, and skilled lecturers. A small percentage (~4%) mention disruptions due to the socio-political crisis and issues with a lecturer.

With one review and an average rating of 5/5, the university receives ~100% positive feedback. Students highlight strong engineering programs, practical experience, diverse environments, research opportunities, and good placement records.

With a single review, the university received a 4/5 rating. This positive feedback highlighted a conducive learning environment, dedicated lecturers, and a comprehensive, practical curriculum. Negative feedback was negligible.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
48%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
33%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
15%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
100%
2★
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
University of Buea

A university with a unique history. It was the first English university that was established in Cameroon in the year 1992 and went operational in the year 1993. So, it is a mother university. University of Buea is described as A PLACE TO BE by many. Located at the foot of mount Cameroon, it is a prestigious university full of knowledge, skill and cultural diversity in Cameroon. In case you visit Cameroon, it will be a pleasure for you to pay a courtesy visit to the mother English university

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close