Colegio Universitario de Rehabilitación May Hamilton - CUR vs Universidad Monteávila vs Instituto Universitario de Nuevas Profesiones - IUNP vs Universidad Nueva Esparta - UNE vs Instituto Universitario de Seguros - IUS

Side-by-side comparison from 10 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad Monteávila (5.00)
Colegio Universitario de Rehabilitación May Hamilton - CUR: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad Monteávila: wins 0/6 categories
Instituto Universitario de Nuevas Profesiones - IUNP: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad Nueva Esparta - UNE: wins 1/6 categories
Instituto Universitario de Seguros - IUS: wins 4/6 categories
Universidad Politécnica Territorial José Antonio Anzoátegui - UPTJAA: wins 0/6 categories
Design Institute of Caracas - IDC: wins 1/6 categories
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.60
Win
Not rated
3.00
Location
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.90
Not rated
4.00
Professors
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
2.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.00
Internationality
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
1.00
2.00
Not rated
4.00
Win
Student life
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
1.00
3.90
Win
Not rated
3.00
Value
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
1.00
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Accommodation
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
3.20
Win
Not rated
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Pioneer in health professions with educational excellence
  • +Committed teachers focused on professional development
  • +Strong ethical commitment to ongoing training
  • +Excellent teachers and integral formation
  • +High academic demand and professional preparation
  • +Supportive campus environment

Nothing to show

  • +Relevant, advanced career programs
  • +Professional development and expertise
  • +Conducive study environment
  • +Prime city center location with convenient access and ample parking.
  • +Well-structured campus layout and a comprehensive, up-to-date syllabus.

Nothing to show

  • +Passionate and expert instructors
  • +Challenging pace for beginners
Cons
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a recurring problem.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and unengaging.
  • -Poor communication and unclear instructions.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
  • -Lack of support and responsiveness from staff.

Nothing to show

  • -Insufficient qualified teaching staff leads to underqualified instructors.
  • -Curriculum reduction omits essential subjects.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Course content and teaching quality are frequently criticized as insufficient.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are a major problem.
  • -Poor communication and a lack of support from instructors are frequently cited.
Rating summary
What students say

Across all surveyed categories, this institution received a uniform rating of zero. This indicates that every aspect, from its facilities and professors to its location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value, is perceived as lacking. Consequently, there are no standout strengths or specific weaknesses to highlight, as all areas are assessed at the same low level.

This institution presents a uniform rating across all assessed aspects, with no standout strengths or weaknesses. All surveyed categories—facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value—received identical scores. The consistent feedback suggests an even performance across the board, without any particular area excelling or falling significantly behind.

Nothing to show

This institution shines in its **location**, receiving a perfect score, and demonstrates solid performance in **facilities**. However, significant weaknesses are apparent in **student life**, **internationality**, and **value**, all earning a low rating of 1. **Professors** and **accommodation** fall in the middle range, suggesting areas for development alongside the lower-scoring aspects.

Academic and experiential strengths define this university's profile, with exceptional scores for Professors and Value (both 5/5). Facilities also stand out at 4.6. Conversely, Internationality presents a significant area for improvement, scoring a low 2/5. Accommodations also lag behind at 3.2, with Location and Student Life earning moderate scores of 3.9 each.

Nothing to show

Offering a compelling proposition, this institution shines particularly brightly in **Value**, receiving a perfect score of 5. Its **Location** and **Internationality** are also strong points, both earning a 4. Conversely, **Facilities**, **Professors**, **Student Life**, and **Accommodation** all received a solid, but less impressive, rating of 3.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4/5 average rating, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students praise educational excellence and committed teachers, particularly in health fields like Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy. Ethical commitment to ongoing training is also highlighted.

All three reviews are highly positive, contributing to a perfect 5/5 average rating. Students praise the integral education, professional preparation, highly trained teachers, and overall positive campus environment. No negative feedback was provided.

Nothing to show

The university receives generally positive feedback, with ~75% of reviews being highly favorable. Some minor concerns were noted about limited transportation access and teaching staff qualifications.

This university has a perfect 5/5 rating based on one review. The single review was highly positive, praising excellent organization, convenient city location, and a comprehensive syllabus. No negative feedback was received.

Nothing to show

With a single review, this university boasts a 4/5 average rating and ~100% positive feedback. The one review highlights knowledgeable, passionate instructors but notes a steep learning curve for new students.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
100%
0%
50%
100%
0%
0%
4★
100%
0%
0%
25%
0%
0%
100%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
25%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Not the best moment for this university

At this moment, this is not the best university to study on Venezuela, it doesn't have enough teachers for all the subjects, because of that, there are students teaching, they are not even graduated. Also they reduced the career from 5 to 4 years, that wasn't good because now we don't see some important subjects that help on the field of engineering. I don't recommend it at this moment.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close