emlyon business school vs Universitè Claude Bernard Lyon 1 - UCBL1 vs Jean Moulin Lyon 3 - JML vs ESSCA School of Management vs ILERI School of International Relations

Side-by-side comparison from 89 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: IDRAC Business School (5.00)
emlyon business school: wins 0/7 categories
Universitè Claude Bernard Lyon 1 - UCBL1: wins 0/7 categories
Jean Moulin Lyon 3 - JML: wins 0/7 categories
ESSCA School of Management: wins 0/7 categories
ILERI School of International Relations: wins 0/7 categories
Ecole de Management IFAG: wins 0/7 categories
IDRAC Business School: wins 7/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
Best programme: Chemistry
Best programme: MBA Master of Business Administration
Best programme: International Business
Best programme: Conflict Resolution and Governance
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor in Innovation and Business Development Management
Category ratings
Facilities
4.15
4.67
4.67
3.86
3.67
2.00
5.00
Win
Location
4.60
4.33
4.67
4.33
3.67
3.00
5.00
Win
Professors
4.06
4.00
3.00
3.95
4.00
4.00
5.00
Win
Internationality
4.60
3.33
4.33
3.86
4.00
4.00
5.00
Win
Student life
4.25
2.33
4.33
4.24
4.67
3.00
5.00
Win
Value
4.43
4.67
4.00
3.77
4.33
3.00
5.00
Win
Accommodation
3.94
4.67
4.33
3.50
3.33
1.00
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical and international programs with diverse students
  • +Valuable professional experience through internships and work-study
  • +Supportive environment for personal and professional development
  • +Strong science and technology programs
  • +Supportive professors and academic environment
  • +Diverse student body
  • +Practical application and industry relevance
  • +Diverse academic programs and extensive choices
  • +Supportive environment and accessible services
  • +Supportive and inclusive learning environment
  • +Practical and applied learning methods
  • +Vibrant student life and international opportunities
  • +Broad international focus and cross-cultural learning
  • +Strong professional development and recognized technical training
  • +Opportunities for networking and future connections

Nothing to show

  • +Approachable and supportive professors
  • +Practical learning and real-world experience
  • +International environment and personal development
Cons
  • -Lack of practical value and shallow content in courses.
  • -Unfair and frustrating grading, especially for group projects.
  • -Disappointing professor engagement and program support.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Communication from staff is often poor and unhelpful.
  • -Poor communication and unhelpful administrative staff are frustrating.
  • -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Course content feels irrelevant and not aligned with current industry needs.
  • -Unprepared and unhelpful professors.
  • -Irrelevant courses and outdated curriculum.
  • -Poor organization and administrative issues.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of responsiveness and clear communication from staff is a major complaint.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -A lack of communication and support from the institution is prevalent.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its internationality and location, both scoring above 4.5. Student life and value also received positive marks, exceeding 4.2 and 4.4 respectively. However, accommodation presents as the weakest area, with the lowest rating of approximately 3.94. Facilities and professors also received solid, though slightly lower, scores in comparison.

This institution scores exceptionally well in several key areas, notably in **Facilities**, **Accomodation**, and **Value**, all receiving a rating of 4.67. **Professors** and **Location** also garnered strong scores. However, **Student Life** emerged as a significantly weaker aspect, with a rating of 2.33. **Internationality** received a moderate rating of 3.33.

This institution shines with outstanding ratings in its facilities and location, both receiving a near-perfect score. Student life, accommodation, and internationality are also strong points, all scoring above 4.3. However, the ratings indicate professors are the weakest area, with a score of 3, while the overall value is rated a respectable 4.

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in its **location**, scoring an impressive 4.33, and in **student life** at 4.24. Ratings for professors and internationality are also solid. The weakest area appears to be **accommodation**, receiving a score of 3.5. Overall, the university presents a generally positive picture with room for improvement in specific aspects.

Overall, the university garners positive ratings, with **Student Life** and **Value** standing out as exceptional strengths. Professors and Internationality also received high marks. Conversely, **Accomodation** appears to be the weakest area, with ratings for Facilities and Location also being moderate. The university presents a well-rounded offering, particularly excelling in student experience and perceived worth.

Nothing to show

Receiving perfect scores across the board, this institution excels in all evaluated aspects. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value are all rated as outstanding. With a consistent five-star performance across every category, there are no discernible weak areas to highlight. The university demonstrates a uniformly strong offering.

Reviews summary
Highlights

The vast majority of university students have a positive experience, highlighting academic rigor, practical learning, and international environments. A small fraction of reviews mention disappointment with course content and grading.

With an average rating of 4/5 based on 5 reviews, ~80% are positive. Students praise good facilities, well-equipped libraries, and a conducive environment, though some note older buildings and a serious atmosphere.

With a 3.67 average rating from 3 reviews, feedback is mostly positive (~67%). Students highlight strong academic programs and diverse educational opportunities. No negative reviews were submitted.

With a 3.91/5 average, ~74% of 22 reviews are positive, praising helpful staff, enjoyable campus life, and practical teaching. Two negative reviews (9.1%) cited unprepared professors and irrelevant courses.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~67% of feedback rating it 4-5 stars. Students highlight excellent programs, a valuable international focus, and professional development opportunities. There is no negative feedback in this sample.

Nothing to show

Both reviews are overwhelmingly positive, rating the university 5/5. Students praise the program's fulfillment of expectations, approachable professors, practical learning, and strong industry connections. The international environment and focus on personal development are also highlighted.

Rating distribution
5★
60%
20%
0%
27%
33%
0%
100%
4★
28%
60%
67%
50%
33%
0%
0%
3★
9%
20%
33%
14%
33%
100%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
5%
0%
0%
0%
1★
2%
0%
0%
5%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

program is good, but social life is dead

The university itself is a bit outdated and the atmosphere can be quite serious. It can be difficult to enjoy the social aspect of university life when you're focused on a demanding academic program. However, it's important to remember that there is a diverse group of students at the university, with a variety of backgrounds and interests. It's possible to find a niche and connect with like-minded people, even in a more traditional academic environment.

Nothing to show

Well-rounded programme

Overall, I had a positive experience at ESSCA. The programme is well organized and provides a solid foundation in business and management. The courses were generally of good quality and covered a broad range of topics, helping students develop both academic knowledge and practical skills. One of the aspects I appreciated most was the international exchange during the third year. ESSCA has a good network of partner universities, and the opportunity to study abroad was a valuable part of the programme. Student life is also a real strength of the school. The associative environment is active and offers many opportunities to get involved outside the classroom, meet new people, and gain additional experience. Like any programme, some courses were more engaging than others, but overall I found the experience enriching and would recommend it to students looking for a business school with a strong international dimension and a good balance between academics and extracurricular activities.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Excellent Experience at IDRAC

I am a Chinese student and I completed my MBA in Business Engineering at IDRAC Business School and the experience has been excellent. The program fully met my expectations. The professors are very approachable, supportive, and always available. I truly appreciated the strong sense of guidance and personal support throughout the course. Highly recommended!

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close