London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs University of Bedfordshire Business School - UBBS vs University of Bedfordshire - UOB vs Central Bedfordshire College

Side-by-side comparison from 423 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: University of Bedfordshire - UOB (4.40)
London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE: wins 2/7 categories
EM Normandie - EM Normandie: wins 0/7 categories
University of Bedfordshire Business School - UBBS: wins 1/7 categories
University of Bedfordshire - UOB: wins 3/7 categories
Central Bedfordshire College: wins 0/7 categories
Oxford Brookes University: wins 0/7 categories
CILEx Law School - CLS: wins 1/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: MSc International Logistics and Port Management
Best programme: BS Information Technology
Milton Keynes, The United Kingdom
4.40
Top
Read more reviews
27 reviews
×
Best programme: English Language and Literature
Bedfordshire, The United Kingdom
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Oxford, The United Kingdom
4.30
Read more reviews
58 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Management and Marketing
Bedfordshire, The United Kingdom
3.90
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Law
Category ratings
Facilities
4.05
4.00
4.17
4.47
Win
Not rated
4.46
2.30
Location
4.78
Win
3.57
4.50
4.68
Not rated
4.52
4.00
Professors
4.26
4.00
4.17
4.54
Win
Not rated
4.20
4.00
Internationality
4.80
Win
4.14
4.33
4.39
Not rated
4.38
3.70
Student life
3.63
3.71
3.83
4.33
Not rated
4.24
4.50
Win
Value
4.04
4.00
4.33
4.56
Win
Not rated
3.98
4.10
Accommodation
3.79
3.50
4.33
Win
4.13
Not rated
3.96
3.20
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Marketable courses and high academic standards
  • +Excellent, expert faculty with industry experience
  • +Supportive, respectful, and flexible learning environment
  • +Connecting theory to practice through real-world cases.
  • +Diverse international environment and global opportunities.
  • +Relevant industry-focused courses and knowledgeable faculty.
  • +Flexible course structure and supportive faculty
  • +Clear communication and ample assignment time
  • +Opportunities for engagement and convenient location
  • +Welcoming and inclusive atmosphere with friendly people and supportive teachers
  • +High-quality teaching from expert, accommodating, and understanding lecturers
  • +Good resources and technological edge facilitating learning

Nothing to show

  • +Strong academic programs with practical application
  • +Vibrant social life and positive campus atmosphere
  • +Exposure to diverse international cultures
  • +Flexible study options for work-life balance
  • +Fosters discipline and independence
Cons
  • -Poor teaching quality and lack of structure in programs.
  • -High fees are not justified by the quality of education and support.
  • -Limited social life and inadequate student support services.
  • -Perceived as a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
  • -Excessive administrative burdens and poor management.
  • -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources.
  • -Lack of practical application and relevance in curriculum.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources detract from the learning experience.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are major concerns.

Nothing to show

  • -Lack of diversity across the wider university
  • -Insufficient student support services
  • -Administrative & management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment frustrate students.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support leads to confusion.
Rating summary
What students say

With a strong emphasis on **Internationality** (4.80) and **Location** (4.78), this institution presents a globally connected and well-situated environment. Professors also receive high marks (4.26). Conversely, **Student Life** (3.63) and **Accommodations** (3.79) are the areas with the lowest reported satisfaction, suggesting room for improvement in campus vibrancy and living arrangements.

This institution performs well across most aspects, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest area. Facilities, Professors, and Value also receive high marks. Areas for potential improvement include **Location**, which scored the lowest, and Accomodation. Student life and the overall value proposition are rated solidly in the mid-to-high range.

With a strong presence in several key areas, this university garners high marks for its **Location** (4.5) and **Accommodations**, **Internationality**, and **Value**, all scoring 4.33. **Facilities** and **Professors** also received positive ratings around 4.17. The area receiving the lowest rating is **Student Life**, standing at 3.83.

Remarkable strengths are evident in this university's **Location**, boasting the highest rating. **Value** and **Professors** also received exceptionally high marks. Areas with the lowest scores, though still generally positive, are **Accomodation** and **Facilities**. The university shows a solid performance in **Student Life** and **Internationality**, contributing to a well-rounded profile.

Nothing to show

This institution receives particularly high marks for its **location** and **facilities**, both scoring above 4.4. Student life and internationality are also well-regarded. Conversely, **accommodation** and **value** are the areas with the lowest scores, both falling just under 4. While professors receive a respectable rating, these two aspects represent the primary opportunities for improvement.

This institution showcases a well-rounded profile, excelling particularly in **Student Life** and **Professors**, both scoring a high 4.5 and 4 respectively. **Facilities** stand out as the weakest area, receiving a rating of 2.3. Other aspects like **Location**, **Internationality**, and **Value** also demonstrate solid performance, generally falling between 3.7 and 4.1. Accomodation offers a moderate score of 3.2.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Most reviews (~74%) praise marketable courses, expert faculty, and excellent research opportunities. Very few (~3.4%) express concerns about teaching quality, grading consistency, and career services.

Most reviews (approximately 71%) highlight a positive learning atmosphere, inspiring professors, and valuable international experiences. A small amount of feedback (around 14%) suggests mediocrity and a focus on profit. The average rating is 3.86/5.

Reviews are predominantly positive, highlighting faculty communication, assignment clarity, and flexible course structures. There are no negative reviews in this sample, with an average rating of 3.83/5.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~89%) with an average rating of 4.37/5. Students frequently praise inclusive and welcoming atmospheres, expert and supportive faculty, and helpful resources like the library. No negative reviews were recorded.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.29/5 from 58 reviews, ~94% of students provide positive feedback, highlighting rewarding academics and a positive social experience. A small percentage (~1.7%) noted areas for improvement.

With a single review, this university is rated 4/5 stars. The positive feedback highlights the benefits of flexible, independent learning, allowing students to balance work and study. No negative feedback was received.

Rating distribution
5★
34%
43%
33%
48%
0%
43%
0%
4★
44%
29%
17%
41%
0%
45%
100%
3★
19%
14%
50%
11%
0%
10%
0%
2★
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2%
0%
1★
1%
14%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Great Experience

LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close