University of the Punjab - PU vs Lahore College for Women University - LCWU vs King Edward Medical University vs Skans School of Accountancy - Nil vs Rashid Latif Medical College

Side-by-side comparison from 95 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Skans School of Accountancy - Nil (4.70)
University of the Punjab - PU: wins 1/7 categories
Lahore College for Women University - LCWU: wins 0/7 categories
King Edward Medical University: wins 3/7 categories
Skans School of Accountancy - Nil: wins 0/7 categories
Rashid Latif Medical College: wins 0/7 categories
CMH Lahore Medical College: wins 3/7 categories
Lahore Leads University: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
Best programme: Botany
Best programme: Bachelor of Medicine
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Best programme: Physiotherapy
Category ratings
Facilities
4.19
3.80
4.33
Win
4.00
Not rated
3.00
3.00
Location
4.66
4.60
3.67
3.67
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.00
Professors
4.43
4.00
4.33
3.67
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
Internationality
3.94
4.00
4.33
Win
3.33
Not rated
3.00
1.00
Student life
4.30
4.20
4.00
3.67
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.00
Value
4.36
Win
4.00
4.33
3.67
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Accommodation
3.94
3.67
4.33
Win
4.00
Not rated
3.00
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Knowledgeable and professional faculty
  • +Strong academic programs and practical experience
  • +Vibrant campus environment and student opportunities
  • +Strong academic programs and engaging, practical teaching
  • +Supportive and approachable faculty and staff
  • +Safe and well-equipped learning environment
  • +Experienced faculty and practical learning methods
  • +Well-equipped facilities and convenient amenities
  • +Prestigious reputation and challenging yet rewarding academic environment
  • +Knowledgeable and passionate instructors
  • +Suitable program recommendations
  • +Professional environment

Nothing to show

  • +High affiliation and accreditation
  • +Modern campus and facilities
  • +Qualified and experienced faculty

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues, particularly with the IT and exam branches, lead to significant delays and unresponsiveness.
  • -Lack of merit and transparency, often requiring connections for support and recognition.
  • -Outdated staff and teaching methods hinder improvement and motivation.
  • -Lack of resources and connections for research in science departments.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a consistent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources negatively impact the learning environment.
  • -Inflexible course structures and unclear communication cause student dissatisfaction.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to frustration.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Communication breakdowns and lack of support are recurring problems.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

University ratings reveal strengths and areas for improvement across several key aspects. The institution excels in **Location** with a remarkable score of 4.66, closely followed by **Professors** at 4.43 and **Student Life** at 4.30. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area, scoring 3.94, with **Internationality** also rating similarly. **Facilities** and **Value** fall within the mid-range at 4.19 and 4.36 respectively.

The university excels particularly in its **location**, receiving a strong 4.6 rating. Student life, internationality, and professor quality are also well-regarded, all scoring a solid 4. The weakest areas, though still respectable, are facilities (3.8) and accommodation (3.67). Overall, value is rated highly at 4.

With excellent scores across most aspects, this institution particularly shines in its **Facilities, Professors, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value**, all receiving approximately 4.3 out of 5. Student life also scores well at a solid 4. The weakest area, though still respectable, is **Location**, which garnered a rating of 3.7.

This university demonstrates notable strengths in its facilities and accommodation, both receiving high marks. Its location, student life, and value for money are also well-regarded, averaging a solid 3.67. The weakest area identified is internationality, which scores slightly lower than other aspects. Overall, the university presents a generally positive profile with specific areas of excellence.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in its faculty expertise, campus location, and vibrant student life, all receiving perfect scores. Conversely, areas such as facilities and accommodation are rated moderately, indicating room for improvement. Internationality also sits at a moderate level. Overall, the university offers good value, reflected in its solid four-star rating.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With ~97.5% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.48/5, students praise knowledgeable faculty, strong academics, and vibrant campus life. A small percentage of reviews mention management and administrative issues.

With an average rating of 3.5/5, roughly 67% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong academics, approachable professors, and engaging classes. Approximately 17% of feedback is negative, with one mention of issues in the science department's research support.

Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%), with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise experienced teachers, modern facilities, and the university's prestige, particularly highlighting the attached hospitals and transport.

With a high average rating of 4.67/5, 100% of feedback is positive. Students praise professors' strong subject knowledge and passion, and appreciate personalized program recommendations that align with budget and facilities.

Nothing to show

The single review is highly positive, awarding 4/5 stars. This feedback highlights strong affiliations, modern facilities, and qualified faculty, with no negative points raised.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
63%
0%
33%
67%
0%
0%
0%
4★
26%
67%
67%
33%
0%
100%
0%
3★
9%
17%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
2★
1%
17%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
About Education system

Im saira students of university of the Punjab i complete my Bs Economics recently i like my university education systems because they give opportunities and chance of needed students of Pakistan and others countries to complete education through funds and scholarships

Nothing to show

Medical university

For me, it was a big achievement to get admission at the King Edward medical university. You really have to work hard to reach this institute and even harder to survive here. But the situation is not bad.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close