Bina Nusantara University - UBN vs Muhammadiyah Jakarta University - UMJ vs Yarsi University vs Esa Unggul University - UEU vs Trisakti Insurance Business School - STMA TRISAKTI

Side-by-side comparison from 23 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Bina Nusantara University - UBN: wins 0/1 categories
Muhammadiyah Jakarta University - UMJ: wins 0/1 categories
Yarsi University: wins 1/1 categories
Esa Unggul University - UEU: wins 0/1 categories
Trisakti Insurance Business School - STMA TRISAKTI: wins 0/1 categories
Universitas MH Thamrin: wins 0/1 categories
Jayabaya University: wins 0/1 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Computer Science
Jakarta, Indonesia
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Law
Best programme: Bachelor in Management
Best programme: Accounting
Jakarta, Indonesia
5.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Hospital and Healthcare Management
Jakarta, Indonesia
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Communication and Public Relations
Category ratings
Facilities
4.43
Not rated
5.00
4.50
4.00
4.00
5.00
Location
4.15
Not rated
5.00
5.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
Professors
4.64
Not rated
5.00
4.50
4.33
5.00
5.00
Internationality
4.71
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.50
3.67
3.50
3.00
Student life
4.21
Not rated
5.00
5.00
4.50
4.50
5.00
Value
4.57
Not rated
5.00
5.00
4.00
4.50
4.00
Accommodation
4.38
Not rated
5.00
4.50
3.33
5.00
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Diverse study programs and numerous student organizations
  • +Supportive lecturers and accommodating, modern facilities
  • +Opportunities for personal growth and peer connection

Nothing to show

  • +Cleanliness and modern facilities
  • +Kind, friendly staff and lecturers
  • +Integrated technology like CCTV and Wi-Fi
  • +Accessible location and engaging classroom environment
  • +Supportive and guiding lecturers
  • +Opportunities for critical thinking and discussion
  • +Strong academic programs and knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Diverse range of programs and majors
  • +Good course material and practical applications
  • +Relevant programs and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Practical learning and industry partnerships
  • +Dynamic and critical idea exchange
  • +Practical application and project engagement
  • +Comprehensive curriculum coverage
Cons
  • -Inefficient administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty and staff is a problem.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources impede learning and comfort.
  • -Inconsistent course quality and teaching effectiveness are a common complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology are a significant drawback.
  • -Lack of clear communication and student support is a problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a problem.
  • -Communication from the institution is frequently poor.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder practical learning.
  • -Inconsistent and unclear communication from faculty and administration.
  • -Lack of career support and relevant industry connections.
  • -Inconsistent and poor communication from administration.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of adequate resources and support for academic and personal needs.
Rating summary
What students say

Across various evaluated aspects, this institution receives strong marks. Internationality stands out as the highest-rated area, followed closely by its professors and overall value. Accommodation and student life also score very well. The weakest performing category, though still positive, is location.

Nothing to show

This institution receives perfect scores across the board, indicating outstanding performance in all evaluated areas. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value are all rated at the highest possible level, presenting a uniformly excellent experience for students. There are no discernible weak areas based on these ratings.

This institution demonstrates outstanding strengths across multiple facets. Its location and student life receive perfect scores, while facilities, professors, accommodation, and internationality are all highly rated at 4.5. Value also stands out with a perfect score. While all areas are strong, the university truly excels in providing an exceptional student experience and an advantageous location.

Student feedback paints a generally positive picture, with **Student Life** standing out as the strongest area at 4.5. **Professors** also receive high marks. The university's **Accomodation** is identified as the weakest point, with a rating of 3.33. Overall, **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Value** are consistently rated well, indicating a solid institutional offering.

This university garners excellent scores in several key areas. Notably, its **Professors** and **Accomodation** received perfect marks, indicating exceptional quality in teaching and living arrangements. **Student Life** and **Value** also scored very highly, suggesting a vibrant campus experience and good return on investment. The university's **Facilities** and **Location** are also well-regarded. The lowest rating was for **Internationality**, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect.

The university garners exceptionally strong scores in several key areas, with perfect ratings awarded for Facilities, Professors, and Student Life. Location and Accommodation are also positively rated at a 4 out of 5. Its weakest area appears to be Internationality, scoring a 3. Overall, the university presents a very positive picture, with a strong emphasis on the student experience and academic quality.

Reviews summary
Highlights

All 14 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.64/5. Students highlight engaging study programs, personal growth opportunities, and accommodating lecturers and facilities. Extracurriculars and modern campuses are also frequently praised.

Nothing to show

With a 4/5 average rating from one review, Yarsi University is positively perceived as a good Muslim campus. The single review highlights cleanliness and modern facilities. Negative feedback is negligible.

With an average rating of 4.5/5, all feedback is positive. Students praise the strategic location and accessible campus. They also highlight caring lecturers who provide guidance and encourage critical thinking.

All three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise knowledgeable lecturers and well-balanced curricula. One reviewer noted minor issues with class registration and system functionality.

Both reviews are positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students highlight a great and relevant campus with diverse programs, knowledgeable faculty, and excellent resources. Practical learning and industry partnerships are appreciated.

This single review is highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5 stars. The feedback highlights Jayabaya's programs effectively combining theory with practical application, through projects and case studies.

Rating distribution
5★
64%
0%
0%
50%
33%
100%
100%
4★
36%
0%
100%
50%
67%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Best private universities in Jakarta

The esa unggul campus is one of the best private universities in the city of Jakarta with a strategic location, easily accessible by various modes of public transportation. With an attractive classroom atmosphere and professional classroom teachers, it creates an informative class.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close