Universidad Loyola Andalucía vs Universidad Rafael Landívar - URL vs University of Calabar - UNICAL vs Protestant University of Applied Sciences vs Arthur Jarvis University - AJU

Side-by-side comparison from 328 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: College of Health Technology - COHTECH (5.00)
Universidad Loyola Andalucía: wins 2/7 categories
Universidad Rafael Landívar - URL: wins 1/7 categories
University of Calabar - UNICAL: wins 0/7 categories
Protestant University of Applied Sciences: wins 0/7 categories
Arthur Jarvis University - AJU: wins 0/7 categories
Cross River University of Technology - Crutech: wins 0/7 categories
College of Health Technology - COHTECH: wins 4/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Bachelor of Communication Studies
Ciudad de Guatemala, Guatemala
4.30
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Children
Best programme: Medicine and Surgery
Best programme: Computer Science
Best programme: Computer Science
Best programme: Community Health
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
4.33
Win
2.95
Not rated
3.43
3.69
4.00
Location
4.00
4.00
3.89
Not rated
2.83
3.73
5.00
Win
Professors
4.67
Win
3.67
3.47
Not rated
3.71
4.00
4.00
Internationality
4.33
Win
2.67
2.98
Not rated
3.43
3.62
4.00
Student life
4.33
4.00
3.50
Not rated
3.43
3.75
5.00
Win
Value
4.33
4.33
3.51
Not rated
3.86
3.92
5.00
Win
Accommodation
2.00
1.33
3.00
Not rated
3.57
3.72
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Small class sizes and interactive professors
  • +Interesting and modern curriculum with practical applications
  • +Flexible scheduling and supportive campus environment
  • +Modern campus facilities and ample study spaces
  • +Strong research focus integrated with internships and social work
  • +Highly knowledgeable professors and strong industry connections
  • +Dedicated and knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Relevant course content and solid academic foundation
  • +Encouragement of discipline, resilience, and personal growth

Nothing to show

  • +Engaging lecturers & supportive learning environment
  • +Value for money & extensive extracurricular opportunities
  • +Good facilities & conducive accommodation
  • +Academic excellence and strong research emphasis
  • +Focus on innovation and practical skills
  • +Entrepreneurship and shaping students for the secular world
  • +Engaging learning activities, positive environment, and excellent lectures.
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a problem.
  • -A lack of resources and support hinders learning.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a consistent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
  • -Communication breakdowns and a perceived lack of support are common complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues contribute to a corrupt and unjust environment.
  • -Poor learning environments and outdated facilities hinder the academic experience.
  • -Lack of lecturer engagement and poor academic standards negatively impact student understanding.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
  • -Poor administrative support and unclear communication.
  • -Lack of engagement and relevance in coursework.
  • -Inadequate security and frequent attacks by external groups.
  • -Ineffective and outdated teaching methods are a recurring concern.
  • -The institution suffers from poor administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are frequently mentioned.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution receives strong marks in several key areas. Professors are highly rated at 4.67, with student life, internationality, and value also scoring well at 4.33. The university also fares well in facilities and location, both rated at 4. However, accommodation stands out as a significant weakness, receiving a low rating of 2.

This institution garners high marks for its **Facilities** and **Value**, both receiving a score of 4.33. **Location** and **Student Life** also fare well, each scoring a 4. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as a significant weakness, with a low rating of 1.33. **Internationality** is also an area for improvement, scoring 2.67, while **Professors** received a moderate rating of 3.67.

Academic and student experience metrics show a mixed but generally positive university profile. Notably, the **location** is the strongest asset, receiving the highest rating. Areas that could benefit from improvement include **facilities** and **accommodations**, which received the lowest scores. Other aspects like professors, student life, internationality, and value fall within a moderate to good range.

Nothing to show

This university receives strong marks for **Value**, its highest rated category. Professors are also highly regarded. Conversely, **Location** is identified as the weakest area. Other categories like Facilities, Student Life, Accommodation, and Internationality also show solid performance, indicating a generally well-rounded experience for students.

This university garners a strong overall impression, with particular praise for its Professors, who received a perfect score. Value for money also ranks highly. Conversely, Internationality received the lowest rating among the surveyed categories. Facilities, Location, Student Life, and Accomodation all achieved solid mid-range scores, indicating a generally positive student experience.

This university garners exceptionally high marks, particularly excelling in its Location, Student Life, Accomodation, and Value, all receiving a perfect score. Professors and Facilities are also highly rated at 4. Internationality is similarly strong with a score of 4. The weakest area, though still a strong score, is Facilities at 4.

Reviews summary
Highlights

University reviews are highly positive, with ~100% of feedback being favorable. Students praise flexible schedules, interesting research and content, and small, interactive classes. Professors are noted as passionate and highly trained, fostering a comfortable and supportive atmosphere.

With 100% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.33/5, reviews highlight modern facilities, campus greenery, and research opportunities. Students also appreciate professors' expertise and the university's societal relevance.

With a 3.41 average rating from 248 reviews, ~44% highlight dedicated lecturers and relevant courses. ~16% of feedback is negative, mentioning slow administration and limited facilities.

Nothing to show

With 5 out of 7 reviews being positive (~74%), students generally highlight a positive learning environment with dedicated lecturers and good facilities. Minor concerns about electricity stability were noted.

~83% of reviews are positive, highlighting academic excellence, well-equipped facilities, and practical skill development. Just ~1.5% express concerns about school security.

With one review received, the university earns a perfect 5/5 average rating. The single review was positive, highlighting great learning activities, environment, and lectures.

Rating distribution
5★
25%
33%
17%
0%
0%
20%
100%
4★
75%
67%
28%
0%
71%
64%
0%
3★
0%
0%
40%
0%
29%
15%
0%
2★
0%
0%
11%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
5%
0%
0%
2%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

My school experience

This esteemed institution excels in academic performance, particularly in technology. Its top-notch programs in Cyber Security, Telecommunications Engineering, and Robotics Engineering are highly regarded. With a strong focus on innovation and practical learning, students are equipped with the skills and knowledge to succeed in their chosen fields. The institution's faculty comprises experienced professionals and researchers who provide mentorship and guidance. State-of-the-art facilities and cutting-edge technology enable students to explore and experiment with the latest advancements. Collaborations with industry partners and research centers further enhance the learning experience. Graduates from this institution are highly sought after by top tech companies and organizations. They possess a deep understanding of theoretical concepts and practical applications, making them valuable assets in the workforce. The institution's commitment to excellence and innovation has earned it a reputation as a leader in technology education. With its rigorous academic programs and emphasis on hands-on learning, this institution prepares students for successful careers in tech. Its strong alumni network and industry connections open doors to exciting opportunities, enabling graduates to make a meaningful impact in their chosen fields.

Nothing to show

My Experience At Arthur Jarvis

I have been a student of Arthur Jarvis University for close to a year,I transferred from a public University down here cause of all the drawbacks our public education system has. So my few months in this new environment hasn't been as great as I thought it would,the education and teaching is really top tier but where the school fails to impress is lack of other means of entertainment for her students,there's literally nothing else to do rather than sports in the evenings,no events of any kind and a lot of restrictions. It makes staying on campus really boring and tiring. Hopefully things would change in the nearest future.

Teaching

This university has high standard lecturers/professors who have passion in teaching. They teach and carry all students along irrespective of your capacity or zeal in studies. I would like to recommend this school to students who want to come out doing well in life and feeling proud about their school.

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close